Biozentrum Grindel, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Museum of Anthropology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2020 May;303(5):1374-1392. doi: 10.1002/ar.24225. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
The Apidima 2 fossil cranium from South Peloponnese is one of the most important hominin specimens from Southeast Europe. Nevertheless, there has been continuous controversy as to whether it represents a so-called Preneandertal/Homo heidelbergensis such as, for example, the Petralona cranium from Northern Greece or a more derived Neandertal. Recent absolute dating evidence alone cannot clarify the issue because both classifications would be possible during the respective Middle Pleistocene time span. Since only limited data were available on the cranium, there have been repeated claims for the need of a broader comparative study of the hominin. The present article presents a CT-based virtual reconstruction including corrections of postmortem fractures and deformation as well as detailed metrical and morphological analyses of the specimen. Endocranial capacity could be estimated for the first time based on virtual reconstruction. Our multivariate analyses of metric data from the face and vault revealed close affinities to early and later Neandertals, especially showing the derived facial morphometrics. In addition, comparative analyses of Apidima 2 were done for many derived Neandertal features. Here again, a significant number of Neandertal features could be found in the Apidima cranium but no conditions common in Preneandertals. In agreement with a later Middle Pleistocene age Apidima is currently the earliest evidence of a hominin in Europe with such a derived Neandertal facial morphology. The place of Apidima in the complex process of Neandertal evolution as well as its taxonomic classification are discussed as well. Anat Rec, 303:1374-1392, 2020. © 2019 American Association for Anatomy.
来自伯罗奔尼撒半岛南部的 Apidima 2 号化石颅骨是东南欧最重要的人类标本之一。然而,关于它是否代表所谓的 Preneandertal/Homo heidelbergensis,例如来自希腊北部的 Petralona 颅骨,或者更衍生的 Neandertal,一直存在持续的争议。最近的绝对年代证据本身并不能澄清这个问题,因为这两种分类在各自的中更新世时期都有可能。由于颅骨的可用数据有限,因此一再有人要求对人类进行更广泛的比较研究。本文介绍了一种基于 CT 的虚拟重建,包括对死后骨折和变形的校正,以及对标本的详细测量和形态学分析。首次可以根据虚拟重建来估计内颅容量。我们对面部和穹顶的度量数据进行的多元分析显示与早期和晚期尼安德特人密切相关,尤其是表现出衍生的面部形态计量学。此外,还对 Apidima 2 进行了许多衍生的尼安德特特征的比较分析。在这里,再次发现 Apidima 颅骨中有大量的尼安德特特征,但没有 Preneandertals 中常见的条件。与中更新世晚期的年龄一致,Apidima 是欧洲最早具有这种衍生的尼安德特人面部形态的人类的证据。还讨论了 Apidima 在尼安德特人进化的复杂过程中的位置及其分类学分类。解剖记录,303:1374-1392,2020. © 2019 美国解剖学协会。