Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, New York, USA.
Centro de Investigación UCM-ISCIII sobre la Evolución y Comportamiento Humanos, Madrid, Spain.
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2024 Jul;307(7):2343-2393. doi: 10.1002/ar.25190. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
The recovery of additional mandibular fossils from the Atapuerca Sima de los Huesos (SH) site provides new insights into the evolutionary significance of this sample. In particular, morphological descriptions of the new adult specimens are provided, along with standardized metric data and phylogenetically relevant morphological features for the expanded adult sample. The new and more complete specimens extend the known range of variation in the Atapuerca (SH) mandibles in some metric and morphological details. In other aspects, the addition of new specimens has made it possible to confirm previous observations based on more limited evidence. Pairwise comparisons of individual metric variables revealed the only significant difference between the Atapuerca (SH) hominins and Neandertals was a more vertical symphysis in the latter. Similarly, principal components analysis of size-adjusted variables showed a strong similarity between the Atapuerca (SH) hominins and Neandertals. Morphologically, the Atapuerca (SH) mandibles show nearly the full complement of Neandertal-derived features. Nevertheless, the Neandertals differ from the Atapuerca (SH) mandibles in showing a high frequency of the H/O mandibular foramen, a truncated, thinned and inverted gonial margin, a high placement of the mylohyoid line at the level of the M3, a more vertical symphysis and somewhat more pronounced expression of the chin structures. Size-related morphological variation in the SH hominins includes larger retromolar spaces, more posterior placement of the lateral corpus structures, and stronger markings associated with the muscles of mastication in larger specimens. However, phylogenetically relevant features in the SH sample are fairly stable and do not vary with the overall size of the mandible. Direct comparison of the enlarged mandibular sample from Atapuerca (SH) with the Mauer mandible, the type specimen of H. heidelbergensis, reveals important differences from the SH hominins, and there is no morphological counterpart of Mauer within the SH sample, suggesting the SH fossils should not be assigned to this taxon. The Atapuerca (SH) mandibles show a greater number of derived Neandertal features, particularly those related to midfacial prognathism and in the configuration of the superior ramus, than other European middle Pleistocene specimens. This suggests that more than one evolutionary lineage co-existed in the middle Pleistocene, and, broadly speaking, it appears possible to separate the European middle Pleistocene mandibular remains into two distinct groupings. One group shows a suite of derived Neandertal features and includes specimens from the sites of Atapuerca (SH), Payre, l'Aubesier and Ehringsdorf. The other group includes specimens that generally lack derived Neandertal features and includes the mandibles from the sites of Mauer, Mala Balanica, Montmaurin and (probably) Visogliano. The two published Arago mandibles differ strongly from one another, with Arago 2 probably belonging to this former group, and Neandertal affinities being more difficult to identify in Arago 13. Outside of the SH sample, derived Neandertal features in the mandible only become more common during the second half of the middle Pleistocene. Acceptance of a cladogenetic pattern of evolution during the European middle Pleistocene has the potential to reconcile the predictions of the accretion model and the two phases model for the appearance of Neandertal morphology. The precise taxonomic classification of the SH hominins must contemplate features from the dentition, cranium, mandible and postcranial skeleton, all of which are preserved at the SH site. Nevertheless, the origin of the Neandertal clade may be tied to a speciation event reflected in the appearance of a suite of derived Neandertal features in the face, dentition and mandible, all of which are present in the Atapuerca (SH) hominins. This same suite of features also provides a useful anatomical basis to include other European middle Pleistocene mandibles and crania within the Neandertal clade.
阿塔普尔卡西马德洛斯 huesos(SH)遗址中额外的下颌骨化石的发现为研究这些样本的进化意义提供了新的视角。特别是,提供了新成年标本的形态描述,以及标准化的度量数据和与进化相关的形态特征,以扩展成年样本。新的、更完整的标本在一些度量和形态细节上扩展了阿塔普尔卡(SH)下颌骨的已知变化范围。在其他方面,新标本的加入使得以前基于更有限的证据得出的观察结果得到了证实。个体度量变量的成对比较显示,阿塔普尔卡(SH)人类与尼安德特人之间唯一的显著差异是后者的颏联合更垂直。同样,大小调整变量的主成分分析显示,阿塔普尔卡(SH)人类与尼安德特人之间具有很强的相似性。形态上,阿塔普尔卡(SH)下颌骨几乎具有尼安德特人衍生特征的完整组合。然而,与阿塔普尔卡(SH)下颌骨相比,尼安德特人具有更高频率的 H/O 下颌骨孔、截断、变薄和倒置的下颌角边缘、更高的下颌舌骨线位于 M3 水平、更垂直的颏联合以及更明显的下巴结构表达。SH 人类中与大小相关的形态变异包括更大的磨牙后空间、侧体结构更靠后放置以及与咀嚼肌相关的更强标记,这些都与较大的标本有关。然而,SH 样本中与进化相关的特征相当稳定,不会随下颌骨的整体大小而变化。将阿塔普尔卡(SH)的放大下颌骨样本与莫阿尔下颌骨(H. heidelbergensis 的典型标本)直接进行比较,发现与 SH 人类有重要差异,而且在 SH 样本中没有莫阿尔的形态对应物,这表明 SH 化石不应被归入这个分类群。阿塔普尔卡(SH)下颌骨显示出比其他欧洲中更新世标本更多的尼安德特人衍生特征,特别是与中面部前突和上支结构有关的特征,这表明在中更新世有不止一个进化谱系共存,广义上说,似乎可以将欧洲中更新世的下颌骨遗骸分为两个不同的分组。一个组显示出一系列衍生的尼安德特人特征,包括来自阿塔普尔卡(SH)、佩雷、卢比斯耶尔和埃林肖德的标本。另一个组包括通常缺乏衍生的尼安德特人特征的标本,包括来自莫阿尔、马拉巴兰卡、蒙马兰和(可能)维索利亚诺的标本。发表的两个阿雷戈下颌骨彼此之间差异很大,阿雷戈 2 可能属于前一组,而阿雷戈 13 中尼安德特人的亲缘关系更难确定。在 SH 样本之外,下颌骨中衍生的尼安德特人特征在中更新世后半段变得更加普遍。在欧洲中更新世接受分支进化模式有可能调和积累模型和尼安德特人形态出现的两个阶段模型的预测。SH 人类的精确分类必须考虑来自牙齿、颅骨、下颌骨和后肢骨骼的特征,所有这些特征都在 SH 遗址中保存下来。然而,尼安德特人谱系的起源可能与一个物种形成事件有关,该事件反映在面部、牙齿和下颌骨中出现的一系列衍生的尼安德特人特征中,这些特征都存在于阿塔普尔卡(SH)人类中。同样的特征组合也为将其他欧洲中更新世的下颌骨和颅骨纳入尼安德特人谱系提供了有用的解剖学基础。