• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中双管混合剂和改良双管混合剂的潜伏期和疗效——一项初步的随机、三盲、劈裂口腔临床研究。

Comparison of latency and efficacy of twin mix and modified twin mix in impacted mandibular third molar surgery - A Preliminary Randomized Triple Blind Split Mouth Clinical Study.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, People's College of Dental Sciences and Research Center, People's University, H-3/2, B.D.A Colony, Nayapura, Lal Ghati, Airport Road, 462037 Bhanpur, Bhopal, MP, India.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, People's College of Dental Sciences and Research Center, People's University, H-3/2, B.D.A Colony, Nayapura, Lal Ghati, Airport Road, 462037 Bhanpur, Bhopal, MP, India.

出版信息

J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;121(3):248-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2019.07.011
PMID:31336212
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Intra-space drug administration have recently gained popularity in the clinical practice posing several advantages over the conventional routes of drug administration. A preliminary prospective randomized triple blind clinical study was conducted to compare the latency and duration of anesthesia with twin mix (1.8ml 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 1ml/4mg dexamethasone) and modified twin mix (1.7ml of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 1ml/4mg dexamethasone) to two conventional local anesthesia solutions along with co-relation of clinical effects in the postoperative phase in patients undergoing extraction of impacted mandibular third molars in terms of patients comfort post-surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted among 20 patients with bilateral impacted mandibular third molars who were randomly allotted to two groups, Group A and B. Each patients in both the groups was allotted with study and control site. Among Group A, patients were further divided into Sub-group L (Control) and Sub-group TM (Twin Mix). Group B patients were divided as Sub-group A (Control) and sub-group MTM (Modified Twin Mix). Sub-group L patients received 1.8ml of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline and sub-group TM received twin mix. Sub-group A received 1.7ml of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline and sub-group MTM received modified twin mix solution. All the procedure was performed by a single operator with a gap of 1 month between the two interventions among both the groups. Various subjective and objective parameters were measured pre-operatively and postoperatively to assess the latency and efficacy of various anesthesia solutions used in this study for third molar removal.

RESULTS

Mean (±SD) VAS scores for sting on injection and pain were found to be less in TM and MTM sub-group with a score of 2.3 (±0.768) and 2.7 (±0.065) respectively. The anesthetic latency was significantly less in sub-group TM, with a mean (±SD) of 52.4 (±28.3) seconds. Sub-groups A and MTM had longer latency of anesthesia when compared with L and TM sub-groups. The duration of soft tissue anesthesia was maximum in sub-group MTM as compared to the other sub-groups. Patients from control sub-groups among both the groups had increased swelling, post-surgical pain and trismus postoperatively.

DISCUSSION

Intra-space administration of twin mix and modified twin mix is clinically efficacious in impacted mandibular third molars surgery with better clinical outcomes postoperatively. We observed one significant difference between TM and MTM that the latter solution provided a prolonged duration of anesthesia increasing the patient's comfort postoperatively after surgical removal of mandibular third molars.

摘要

简介

最近, 经皮腔内给药在临床实践中越来越受欢迎, 与传统的药物给药途径相比具有许多优势。 我们进行了一项初步的前瞻性随机三盲临床试验, 比较了双混合剂(2%利多卡因 1.8ml 加 1:200000 肾上腺素和 1ml/4mg 地塞米松)和改良双混合剂(4%阿替卡因 1.7ml 加 1:100000 肾上腺素和 1ml/4mg 地塞米松)与两种常规局部麻醉溶液在麻醉潜伏期和持续时间方面的差异, 并比较了在接受下颌第三磨牙阻生牙拔除术的患者中术后阶段的临床效果, 以评估患者手术后的舒适度。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 20 名双侧下颌第三磨牙阻生的患者, 他们被随机分为两组, A 组和 B 组。 每组的每位患者都被分配了研究和对照部位。 在 A 组中, 患者进一步分为 L 亚组(对照)和 TM 亚组(双混合剂)。 B 组患者分为 A 亚组(对照)和 MTM 亚组(改良双混合剂)。 L 亚组患者接受 1.8ml 2%利多卡因加 1:200000 肾上腺素, TM 亚组接受双混合剂。 A 亚组患者接受 1.7ml 4%阿替卡因加 1:100000 肾上腺素, MTM 亚组接受改良双混合剂溶液。 所有程序均由一名操作员进行, 两组之间的两次干预间隔为 1 个月。 在术前和术后评估了各种主观和客观参数, 以评估用于第三磨牙拔除的各种麻醉溶液的潜伏期和效果。

结果

在 TM 和 MTM 亚组中, 注射刺痛和疼痛的平均(±SD)VAS 评分分别为 2.3(±0.768)和 2.7(±0.065), 评分较低。 TM 亚组的麻醉潜伏期明显较短, 平均(±SD)为 52.4(±28.3)秒。 与 L 和 TM 亚组相比, A 和 MTM 亚组的麻醉潜伏期较长。 MTM 亚组的软组织麻醉持续时间最长。 与两组的对照亚组相比, 术后患者肿胀、 术后疼痛和牙关紧闭增加。

讨论

经皮腔内给予双混合剂和改良双混合剂在下颌第三磨牙手术中具有临床疗效, 术后临床效果更好。 我们观察到 TM 和 MTM 之间存在一个显著差异, 即后者溶液提供了更长的麻醉持续时间, 增加了患者在接受下颌第三磨牙手术后的舒适度。

相似文献

1
Comparison of latency and efficacy of twin mix and modified twin mix in impacted mandibular third molar surgery - A Preliminary Randomized Triple Blind Split Mouth Clinical Study.比较下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中双管混合剂和改良双管混合剂的潜伏期和疗效——一项初步的随机、三盲、劈裂口腔临床研究。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;121(3):248-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
2
A prospective randomized double-blind study to assess the latency and efficacy of twin-mix and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a pilot study.一项前瞻性随机双盲研究,旨在评估双混剂与含1:200,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因在外科拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙中的潜伏期和疗效:一项初步研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;17(4):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0372-3. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
3
Effects of intra-space injection of Twin mix versus intraoral-submucosal, intramuscular, intravenous and per-oral administration of dexamethasone on post-operative sequelae after mandibular impacted third molar surgery: a preliminary clinical comparative study.下颌阻生第三磨牙手术后,双混剂(Twin mix)间隙内注射与地塞米松口腔黏膜下、肌肉、静脉及口服给药对术后后遗症的影响:一项初步临床对比研究
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;18(3):293-6. doi: 10.1007/s10006-013-0412-7. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
4
Validation of data on the use of twin mix in minor oral surgery: comparative evaluation of efficacy of twin mix versus 2 % lignocaine with 1:200000 epinephrine based on power analysis and an UV spectrometry study for chemical stability of the mixture.小型口腔外科中双混剂使用数据的验证:基于功效分析以及对混合物化学稳定性的紫外光谱研究,对双混剂与含1:200000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因的疗效进行比较评估。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;19(1):37-41. doi: 10.1007/s10006-014-0446-5. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
5
Comparative evaluation of efficacy and latency of twin mix vs 2% lignocaine HCL with 1:80000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar.在外科手术拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙中,对复方混合物与含1:80000肾上腺素的2%盐酸利多卡因的疗效和潜伏期进行比较评估。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Feb 28;9(2):904-908. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_998_19. eCollection 2020 Feb.
6
Twin Mixed Local Anesthesia in Third Molar Surgery - Randomized Controlled Trial.双氯芬酸钠与罗哌卡因用于下颌第三磨牙拔除术的多中心随机对照研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jan;80(1):63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
7
Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.4%阿替卡因与2%利多卡因在双侧下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中疗效的比较研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):743-748.
8
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine HCl with different epinephrine concentration for local anesthesia in participants undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, phase IV trial.不同肾上腺素浓度的2%盐酸利多卡因用于下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术局部麻醉的疗效与安全性比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲、交叉、IV期试验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(21):e6753. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006753.
9
Submucosal dexamethasone injection improves quality of life measures after third molar surgery: a comparative study.黏膜下注射地塞米松可改善第三磨牙拔除术后的生活质量指标:一项对比研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Sep;69(9):2289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.01.037. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
10
Piezo-surgery technique and intramuscular dexamethasone injection to reduce postoperative pain after impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial.超声骨刀法结合肌内注射地塞米松减轻下颌阻生第三磨牙术后疼痛的随机临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Aug 11;21(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01759-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evlaution of Different Suturing Techniques in Deep Third Molar Surgery: An Original Research.深部第三磨牙手术中不同缝合技术的评估:一项原创研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2658-S2660. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_401_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
2
Why choose articaine over lidocaine for the removal of third molars? Systematic review and meta-analysis.为什么在拔除第三磨牙时选择阿替卡因而非利多卡因?系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Nov 1;15(11):e963-e977. doi: 10.4317/jced.60682. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
A Prospective Randomized Study to Assess the Quality of Life in Post-Operative Recovery Phase in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Isolated Vertically Undisplaced Mandibular Parasymphysis Fracture Using Twin Mix Solution.
一项前瞻性随机研究,旨在评估使用双混合溶液治疗孤立性垂直无移位下颌骨颏部骨折患者术后恢复阶段的生活质量。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Jun;21(2):413-419. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01471-3. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
4
Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis.用于下颌第三磨牙拔除术疼痛控制的麻醉溶液的有效性:一项包含网络荟萃分析的随机临床试验的系统评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jan;25(1):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03675-w. Epub 2020 Nov 8.