• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深部第三磨牙手术中不同缝合技术的评估:一项原创研究

Evlaution of Different Suturing Techniques in Deep Third Molar Surgery: An Original Research.

作者信息

Baig Fawaz Abdul Hamid, Beniwal Sunil Kumar, Samir P V, Venkateshwar Gokul, Singh Mamta, Pendyala Siva Kumar

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King Khalid University College of Dentistry, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gian Sagar Dental College and Hospital, Jansla, Punjab, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2658-S2660. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_401_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_401_24
PMID:39346242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11426757/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of various suturing methods used in deep third molar extraction procedures.

METHODS

A total of four suturing method groups-simple interrupted, horizontal mattress, vertical mattress, and figure-of-eight-were randomly allocated to 100 patients having deep third molar surgery. Assessments were conducted on wound healing, operation time, intraoperative problems, postoperative pain scores, swelling measures, and patient satisfaction questionnaires. Appropriate tests were used for statistical analysis, with < 0.05 being regarded as significant.

RESULTS

Compared to other procedures, the figure-of-eight technique showed better results in terms of postoperative pain scores, swelling measures, wound healing percentages, and patient satisfaction ( < 0.05). There was no discernible difference in the operating time or intraoperative problems between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, there seems to be a benefit to using the figure-of-eight suturing approach for deep third molar surgery in terms of improved postoperative results and patient satisfaction. It is recommended that clinicians give this strategy some thought to improve patient care and surgical results.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较在深部第三磨牙拔除手术中使用的各种缝合方法的疗效。

方法

总共四个缝合方法组——单纯间断缝合、水平褥式缝合、垂直褥式缝合和8字缝合——被随机分配给100例行深部第三磨牙手术的患者。对伤口愈合情况、手术时间、术中问题、术后疼痛评分、肿胀程度以及患者满意度问卷进行评估。使用适当的检验进行统计分析,P<0.05被视为具有显著性。

结果

与其他手术方法相比,8字缝合技术在术后疼痛评分、肿胀程度、伤口愈合百分比和患者满意度方面显示出更好的结果(P<0.05)。各组之间在手术时间或术中问题方面没有明显差异。

结论

总之,就改善术后结果和患者满意度而言,在深部第三磨牙手术中使用8字缝合方法似乎有益。建议临床医生考虑这一策略以改善患者护理和手术效果。

相似文献

1
Evlaution of Different Suturing Techniques in Deep Third Molar Surgery: An Original Research.深部第三磨牙手术中不同缝合技术的评估:一项原创研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2658-S2660. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_401_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
2
Is Horizontal Mattress Suturing More Effective Than Simple Interrupted Suturing on Postoperative Complications and Primary Wound Healing After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery?水平褥式缝合在阻生下颌第三磨牙拔除术后并发症及创口一期愈合方面是否比单纯间断缝合更有效?
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Oct;28(7):e657-e661. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003813.
3
Comparison of Different Suturing Techniques in Post-Extraction Socket Healing.拔牙后牙槽窝愈合中不同缝合技术的比较
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S675-S677. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_937_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Comparison of two different suture knot techniques on postoperative morbidity after impacted mandibular third molar surgery.比较两种不同的缝合结技术对下颌阻生第三磨牙手术后术后发病率的影响。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;121(3):206-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Single blind, randomized study comparing clinical equivalence of Trusilk and Mersilk silk sutures for mucosal closure following surgical removal of mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar.单盲、随机研究比较 Trusilk 和 Mersilk 丝线用于下颌第三磨牙近中阻生外科拔除后黏膜缝合的临床等效性。
F1000Res. 2022 Jun 21;11:689. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.122678.1. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparing primary and secondary wound healing discomfort after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.下颌第三磨牙手术后一期与二期伤口愈合不适的比较:一项随机双盲临床试验。
Gen Dent. 2011 Jul-Aug;59(4):310-3.
7
Influence of a novel suturing technique on periodontal health of mandibular second molar following impacted third molar surgery: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.一种新型缝合技术对阻生第三磨牙拔除术后下颌第二磨牙牙周健康的影响:一项双侧对照随机临床试验
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Mar 22;44(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40902-022-00342-w.
8
Comparison of primary and secondary closure with a buccal mucosal-advancement flap on postoperative course after mandibular impacted third molar surgery.下颌阻生第三磨牙手术后,颊黏膜推进瓣一次缝合与二次缝合术后进程的比较。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Mar;24(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s10006-019-00814-w. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
9
Flap repositioning versus conventional suturing in third molar surgery.第三磨牙手术中皮瓣复位与传统缝合的比较
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Feb 1;13(2):E138-42.
10
Effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF) on postoperative sequel of completely impacted lower third molar extraction: a randomized controlled clinical study.浓缩生长因子(CGF)对完全埋伏阻生下颌第三磨牙拔除术后并发症的影响:一项随机对照临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02408-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbiological Analysis of Bacterial Plaque on Various Suture Types Used in Third Molar Surgical Extraction: a Systematic Review.第三磨牙外科拔除术中使用的各种缝线类型上细菌菌斑的微生物学分析:一项系统综述
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2025 Jun 30;16(2):e3. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2025.16203. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Single blind, randomized study comparing clinical equivalence of Trusilk and Mersilk silk sutures for mucosal closure following surgical removal of mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar.单盲、随机研究比较 Trusilk 和 Mersilk 丝线用于下颌第三磨牙近中阻生外科拔除后黏膜缝合的临床等效性。
F1000Res. 2022 Jun 21;11:689. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.122678.1. eCollection 2022.
2
Preemptive Oral Ketorolac with Local Tramadol Versus Oral Ketorolac in Third Molar Surgery: A Comparative Clinical Trial.第三磨牙手术中口服酮咯酸联合局部曲马多与单纯口服酮咯酸的比较:一项对比临床试验
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Mar;21(1):227-234. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01400-4. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
3
Efficiency of Laser versus Bur in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: An Original Research.激光与牙钻在下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中的效率:一项原创研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1501-S1505. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_266_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
Effectiveness of knotless suture as a wound closure agent for impacted third molar - A split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.无结缝线作为阻生第三磨牙伤口闭合剂的效果:一项分口随机对照临床试验。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;48(10):1004-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
5
Rare case of gemination of mandibular third molar-A case report.下颌第三磨牙双生罕见病例——病例报告
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 May 31;9(5):2577-2579. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_117_20. eCollection 2020 May.
6
Effect of lingual-based flap design on postoperative pain of impacted mandibular third molar surgery: Split-mouth randomized clinical trial.基于舌侧瓣设计对下颌阻生第三磨牙手术术后疼痛的影响:随机对照的分口临床试验。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 Sep 1;25(5):e660-e667. doi: 10.4317/medoral.23666.
7
Comparison of two different suture knot techniques on postoperative morbidity after impacted mandibular third molar surgery.比较两种不同的缝合结技术对下颌阻生第三磨牙手术后术后发病率的影响。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;121(3):206-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
8
A prospective split-mouth clinical study: comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted third molar surgery.一项前瞻性半口临床研究:阻生第三磨牙手术中压电手术与传统旋转器械的比较。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Mar;24(1):51-55. doi: 10.1007/s10006-019-00817-7. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
9
Comparison of two different flap designs for bilateral impacted mandibular third molar surgery.比较两种不同设计的双侧下颌阻生第三磨牙手术的皮瓣。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Sep;121(4):368-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
10
Comparison of latency and efficacy of twin mix and modified twin mix in impacted mandibular third molar surgery - A Preliminary Randomized Triple Blind Split Mouth Clinical Study.比较下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中双管混合剂和改良双管混合剂的潜伏期和疗效——一项初步的随机、三盲、劈裂口腔临床研究。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;121(3):248-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Jul 20.