• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结合统计方法预测牛肉嫩度:化学计量学与监督学习用于管理从农场到肉类的连续综合数据

Beef Tenderness Prediction by a Combination of Statistical Methods: Chemometrics and Supervised Learning to Manage Integrative Farm-To-Meat Continuum Data.

作者信息

Gagaoua Mohammed, Monteils Valérie, Couvreur Sébastien, Picard Brigitte

机构信息

UMR Herbivores, VetAgro Sup, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRA, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.

URSE, Ecole Supérieure d'Agriculture (ESA), Université Bretagne Loire, 55 Rue Rabelais, BP 30748, 49007 Angers, CEDEX, France.

出版信息

Foods. 2019 Jul 22;8(7):274. doi: 10.3390/foods8070274.

DOI:10.3390/foods8070274
PMID:31336646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6678335/
Abstract

This trial aimed to integrate metadata that spread over farm-to-fork continuum of 110 Protected Designation of Origin (PDO)Maine-Anjou cows and combine two statistical approaches that are chemometrics and supervised learning; to identify the potential predictors of beef tenderness analyzed using the instrumental Warner-Bratzler Shear force (WBSF). Accordingly, 60 variables including WBSF and belonging to 4 levels of the continuum that are farm-slaughterhouse-muscle-meat were analyzed by Partial Least Squares (PLS) and three decision tree methods (C&RT: classification and regression tree; QUEST: quick, unbiased, efficient regression tree and CHAID: Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection) to select the driving factors of beef tenderness and propose predictive decision tools. The former method retained 24 variables from 59 to explain 75% of WBSF. Among the 24 variables, six were from farm level, four from slaughterhouse level, 11 were from muscle level which are mostly protein biomarkers, and three were from meat level. The decision trees applied on the variables retained by the PLS model, allowed identifying three WBSF classes (Tender (WBSF ≤ 40 N/cm), Medium (40 N/cm < WBSF < 45 N/cm), and Tough (WBSF ≥ 45 N/cm)) using CHAID as the best decision tree method. The resultant model yielded an overall predictive accuracy of 69.4% by five splitting variables (total collagen, µ-calpain, fiber area, age of weaning and ultimate pH). Therefore, two decision model rules allow achieving tender meat on PDO Maine-Anjou cows: (i) IF (total collagen < 3.6 μg OH-proline/mg) AND (µ-calpain ≥ 169 arbitrary units (AU)) AND (ultimate pH < 5.55) THEN meat was very tender (mean WBSF values = 36.2 N/cm, = 12); or (ii) IF (total collagen < 3.6 μg OH-proline/mg) AND (µ-calpain < 169 AU) AND (age of weaning < 7.75 months) AND (fiber area < 3100 µm) THEN meat was tender (mean WBSF values = 39.4 N/cm, = 30).

摘要

本试验旨在整合110头受保护原产地认证(PDO)的曼恩-安茹牛从农场到餐桌整个连续过程中的元数据,并结合化学计量学和监督学习这两种统计方法;以识别使用沃纳-布拉茨勒剪切力(WBSF)仪器分析的牛肉嫩度的潜在预测指标。因此,通过偏最小二乘法(PLS)和三种决策树方法(C&RT:分类与回归树;QUEST:快速、无偏、高效回归树;CHAID:卡方自动交互检测)分析了包括WBSF在内的60个变量,这些变量属于农场-屠宰场-肌肉-肉这4个连续水平,以选择牛肉嫩度的驱动因素并提出预测决策工具。前一种方法从59个变量中保留了24个变量,以解释75%的WBSF。在这24个变量中,6个来自农场水平,4个来自屠宰场水平,11个来自肌肉水平(大多为蛋白质生物标志物),3个来自肉品水平。将决策树应用于PLS模型保留的变量上,以CHAID作为最佳决策树方法,可识别出三个WBSF类别(嫩度等级(WBSF≤40 N/cm)、中等(40 N/cm<WBSF<45 N/cm)和坚韧(WBSF≥45 N/cm))。最终模型通过五个分割变量(总胶原蛋白、μ-钙蛋白酶、纤维面积、断奶年龄和最终pH值)得出的总体预测准确率为69.4%。因此,两条决策模型规则可使PDO曼恩-安茹牛产出嫩肉:(i)如果(总胶原蛋白<3.6μg羟脯氨酸/毫克)且(μ-钙蛋白酶≥169任意单位(AU))且(最终pH值<5.55),那么肉非常嫩(平均WBSF值=36.2 N/cm,样本量=12);或者(ii)如果(总胶原蛋白<3.6μg羟脯氨酸/毫克)且(μ-钙蛋白酶<169 AU)且(断奶年龄<7.75个月)且(纤维面积<3100µm),那么肉是嫩的(平均WBSF值=39.4 N/cm,样本量=30)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c2/6678335/495a28755e31/foods-08-00274-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c2/6678335/624c71223d0a/foods-08-00274-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c2/6678335/59a36de63f93/foods-08-00274-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c2/6678335/495a28755e31/foods-08-00274-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c2/6678335/624c71223d0a/foods-08-00274-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c2/6678335/59a36de63f93/foods-08-00274-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6c2/6678335/495a28755e31/foods-08-00274-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Beef Tenderness Prediction by a Combination of Statistical Methods: Chemometrics and Supervised Learning to Manage Integrative Farm-To-Meat Continuum Data.结合统计方法预测牛肉嫩度:化学计量学与监督学习用于管理从农场到肉类的连续综合数据
Foods. 2019 Jul 22;8(7):274. doi: 10.3390/foods8070274.
2
Data from the Farmgate-to-Meat Continuum Including Omics-Based Biomarkers to Better Understand the Variability of Beef Tenderness: An Integromics Approach.从农场到餐桌的全过程数据,包括基于组学的生物标志物,以更好地了解牛肉嫩度的可变性:一种整合组学方法。
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Dec 26;66(51):13552-13563. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05744. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
3
Protein Array-Based Approach to Evaluate Biomarkers of Beef Tenderness and Marbling in Cows: Understanding of the Underlying Mechanisms and Prediction.基于蛋白质阵列的方法评估奶牛牛肉嫩度和大理石花纹的生物标志物:对潜在机制的理解和预测
Foods. 2020 Aug 26;9(9):1180. doi: 10.3390/foods9091180.
4
Decision tree, a learning tool for the prediction of beef tenderness using rearing factors and carcass characteristics.决策树,一种利用饲养因素和胴体特征预测牛肉嫩度的学习工具。
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Feb;99(3):1275-1283. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9301. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
5
Pork tenderness estimation by taste panel, Warner-Bratzler shear force and on-line methods.通过味觉小组、沃纳-布拉茨勒剪切力和在线方法评估猪肉嫩度。
Meat Sci. 1999 Dec;53(4):259-67. doi: 10.1016/s0309-1740(99)00067-4.
6
Effects of genetic markers and implant strategy on longissimus and gluteus muscle tenderness of calf-fed steers and heifers.遗传标记和植入策略对犊牛育肥牛长肌和臀肌嫩度的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2011 May;89(5):1401-11. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-2893. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
7
Phenotypic ranges and relationships among carcass and meat palatability traits for fourteen cattle breeds, and heritabilities and expected progeny differences for Warner-Bratzler shear force in three beef cattle breeds.14个牛品种胴体及肉适口性性状的表型范围和关系,以及3个肉牛品种中Warner-Bratzler剪切力的遗传力和预期后代差异。
J Anim Sci. 2005 Oct;83(10):2461-7. doi: 10.2527/2005.83102461x.
8
Online prediction of beef tenderness using a computer vision system equipped with a BeefCam module.使用配备BeefCam模块的计算机视觉系统对牛肉嫩度进行在线预测。
J Anim Sci. 2003 Feb;81(2):457-65. doi: 10.2527/2003.812457x.
9
Meta-proteomics for the discovery of protein biomarkers of beef tenderness: An overview of integrated studies.元蛋白质组学在牛肉嫩度蛋白生物标志物发现中的应用:综合研究综述。
Food Res Int. 2020 Jan;127:108739. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108739. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Assessment of cattle inter-individual cluster variability: the potential of continuum data from the farm-to-fork for ultimate beef tenderness management.评估牛个体间的聚类变异性:从农场到餐桌的连续数据在最终牛肉嫩度管理中的潜力。
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Jun;99(8):4129-4141. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9643. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization and Discrimination of Apples by Flash GC E-Nose: Geographical Regions and Botanical Origins Studies in China.基于快速气相色谱电子鼻的苹果表征与鉴别:中国地理区域和植物起源研究
Foods. 2022 May 31;11(11):1631. doi: 10.3390/foods11111631.
2
Understanding the Determination of Meat Quality Using Biochemical Characteristics of the Muscle: Stress at Slaughter and Other Missing Keys.利用肌肉生化特性理解肉质的判定:屠宰时的应激及其他缺失的关键因素
Foods. 2021 Jan 4;10(1):84. doi: 10.3390/foods10010084.
3
Protein Array-Based Approach to Evaluate Biomarkers of Beef Tenderness and Marbling in Cows: Understanding of the Underlying Mechanisms and Prediction.

本文引用的文献

1
The associations between proteomic biomarkers and beef tenderness depend on the end-point cooking temperature, the country origin of the panelists and breed.蛋白质组学生物标志物与牛肉嫩度之间的关系取决于终点烹饪温度、专家组成员所在国家/地区以及品种。
Meat Sci. 2019 Nov;157:107871. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
2
Relationships Between Cull Beef Cow Characteristics, Finishing Practices and Meat Quality Traits of and .阉牛母牛特征、育肥方式与[具体牛种]肉质性状之间的关系
Foods. 2019 Apr 25;8(4):141. doi: 10.3390/foods8040141.
3
Beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: Effect of gender and rearing practices.
基于蛋白质阵列的方法评估奶牛牛肉嫩度和大理石花纹的生物标志物:对潜在机制的理解和预测
Foods. 2020 Aug 26;9(9):1180. doi: 10.3390/foods9091180.
4
Current Advances in Meat Nutritional, Sensory and Physical Quality Improvement.肉类营养、感官和物理品质改善的当前进展
Foods. 2020 Mar 10;9(3):321. doi: 10.3390/foods9030321.
牛肉嫩度和肌内脂肪蛋白质组学生物标志物:性别和饲养方式的影响。
J Proteomics. 2019 May 30;200:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
4
Study of the Chronology of Expression of Ten Extracellular Matrix Molecules during the Myogenesis in Cattle to Better Understand Sensory Properties of Meat.研究牛肌肉生成过程中十种细胞外基质分子的表达时间顺序,以更好地理解肉的感官特性。
Foods. 2019 Mar 13;8(3):97. doi: 10.3390/foods8030097.
5
Assessment of cattle inter-individual cluster variability: the potential of continuum data from the farm-to-fork for ultimate beef tenderness management.评估牛个体间的聚类变异性:从农场到餐桌的连续数据在最终牛肉嫩度管理中的潜力。
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Jun;99(8):4129-4141. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9643. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
6
Data from the Farmgate-to-Meat Continuum Including Omics-Based Biomarkers to Better Understand the Variability of Beef Tenderness: An Integromics Approach.从农场到餐桌的全过程数据,包括基于组学的生物标志物,以更好地了解牛肉嫩度的可变性:一种整合组学方法。
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Dec 26;66(51):13552-13563. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05744. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
7
Decision tree, a learning tool for the prediction of beef tenderness using rearing factors and carcass characteristics.决策树,一种利用饲养因素和胴体特征预测牛肉嫩度的学习工具。
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Feb;99(3):1275-1283. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9301. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
8
Use of liquid isoelectric focusing (OFFGEL) on the discovery of meat tenderness biomarkers.利用液体等电聚焦(OFFGEL)发现肉嫩度生物标志物。
J Proteomics. 2018 Jul 15;183:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 9.
9
Contribution of collagen and connective tissue to cooked meat toughness; some paradigms reviewed.胶原蛋白和结缔组织对熟肉韧性的贡献;综述一些范例。
Meat Sci. 2018 Oct;144:127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
10
Associations among animal, carcass, muscle characteristics, and fresh meat color traits in Charolais cattle.夏洛莱牛的动物、胴体、肌肉特性与鲜肉颜色特性之间的关系。
Meat Sci. 2018 Jun;140:145-156. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 8.