• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用博弈论理解系统获得性抗性,将其作为疾病不确定时提高适应性的一种风险对冲选择。

Using Game Theory to Understand Systemic Acquired Resistance as a Bet-Hedging Option for Increasing Fitness When Disease Is Uncertain.

作者信息

Reynolds Gregory J, Gordon Thomas R, McRoberts Neil

机构信息

Forest Health Protection, U.S. Forest Service, 333 Broadway Blvd. SE, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA.

Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

Plants (Basel). 2019 Jul 12;8(7):219. doi: 10.3390/plants8070219.

DOI:10.3390/plants8070219
PMID:31336852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681293/
Abstract

Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is a mechanism through which plants may respond to initial challenge by a pathogen through activation of inducible defense responses, thereby increasing resistance to subsequent infection attempts. Fitness costs are assumed to be incurred by plants induced for SAR, and several studies have attempted to quantify these costs. We developed a mathematical model, motivated by game-theoretic concepts, to simulate competition between hypothetical plant populations with and without SAR to examine conditions under which the phenomenon of SAR may have evolved. Data were gathered from various studies on fitness costs of induced resistance on life history traits in different plant hosts and scaled as a proportion of the values in control cohorts in each study (i.e., healthy plants unprimed for SAR). With unprimed healthy control plants set to a fitness value of 1, primed healthy plants incurred a fitness cost of about 10.4% (0.896, = 157), primed diseased plants incurred a fitness cost of about 15.5% (0.845, = 54), and unprimed diseased plants incurred a fitness cost of about 28.9% (0.711, = 69). Starting from a small proportion of the population (0.5%) and competing against a population with constitutive defenses alone in stochastic simulations, the SAR phenotype almost always dominated the population after 1000 generations when the probability of disease was greater than or equal to 0.5 regardless of the probability for priming errors.

摘要

系统获得性抗性(SAR)是植物通过激活诱导防御反应来应对病原体初次挑战的一种机制,从而增强对后续感染的抗性。人们认为诱导SAR的植物会付出适应性代价,已有多项研究试图对这些代价进行量化。我们基于博弈论概念开发了一个数学模型,以模拟具有和不具有SAR的假设植物种群之间的竞争,从而研究SAR现象可能进化的条件。数据来自关于不同植物宿主中诱导抗性对生活史特征适应性代价的各种研究,并按每项研究中对照群体(即未进行SAR预处理的健康植物)的值的比例进行缩放。将未预处理的健康对照植物的适应性值设为1,预处理的健康植物的适应性代价约为10.4%(0.896,n = 157),预处理的患病植物的适应性代价约为15.5%(0.845,n = 54),未预处理的患病植物的适应性代价约为28.9%(0.711,n = 69)。在随机模拟中,从种群的一小部分(0.5%)开始,与仅具有组成型防御的种群竞争,当疾病概率大于或等于0.5时,无论引发错误的概率如何,SAR表型在1000代后几乎总是占据种群主导地位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295e/6681293/b1ba93f9d95d/plants-08-00219-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295e/6681293/fc74bb876641/plants-08-00219-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295e/6681293/01a673d512aa/plants-08-00219-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295e/6681293/de8e7ec5a29c/plants-08-00219-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295e/6681293/309717ef7b7d/plants-08-00219-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295e/6681293/b1ba93f9d95d/plants-08-00219-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295e/6681293/fc74bb876641/plants-08-00219-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295e/6681293/01a673d512aa/plants-08-00219-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295e/6681293/de8e7ec5a29c/plants-08-00219-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295e/6681293/309717ef7b7d/plants-08-00219-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/295e/6681293/b1ba93f9d95d/plants-08-00219-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Game Theory to Understand Systemic Acquired Resistance as a Bet-Hedging Option for Increasing Fitness When Disease Is Uncertain.运用博弈论理解系统获得性抗性,将其作为疾病不确定时提高适应性的一种风险对冲选择。
Plants (Basel). 2019 Jul 12;8(7):219. doi: 10.3390/plants8070219.
2
rgs-CaM Detects and Counteracts Viral RNA Silencing Suppressors in Plant Immune Priming.Rgs-CaM在植物免疫启动中检测并对抗病毒RNA沉默抑制子。
J Virol. 2017 Sep 12;91(19). doi: 10.1128/JVI.00761-17. Print 2017 Oct 1.
3
Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: mechanism of action.植物的诱导系统抗性(ISR):作用机制。
Indian J Microbiol. 2007 Dec;47(4):289-97. doi: 10.1007/s12088-007-0054-2. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
4
Impact of hormonal crosstalk on plant resistance and fitness under multi-attacker conditions.激素相互作用对多攻击者条件下植物抗性和适应性的影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Aug 17;6:639. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00639. eCollection 2015.
5
MAPK-dependent JA and SA signalling in Nicotiana attenuata affects plant growth and fitness during competition with conspecifics.茉莉酸和水杨酸依赖 MAPK 的信号通路在黄花烟草中影响与同种竞争时的植物生长和适合度。
BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Nov 13;12:213. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-213.
6
Fitness benefits of systemic acquired resistance during Hyaloperonospora parasitica infection in Arabidopsis thaliana.拟南芥受寄生霜霉感染期间系统获得性抗性的健康益处。
Genetics. 2006 Jul;173(3):1621-8. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.059022. Epub 2006 Apr 30.
7
Pieris brassicae eggs trigger interplant systemic acquired resistance against a foliar pathogen in Arabidopsis.小菜蛾卵触发拟南芥对叶部病原菌的行间系统性获得抗性。
New Phytol. 2020 Dec;228(5):1652-1661. doi: 10.1111/nph.16788. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
8
Systemic acquired resistance in moss: further evidence for conserved defense mechanisms in plants.苔藓中的系统获得性抗性:植物中保守防御机制的进一步证据。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 7;9(7):e101880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101880. eCollection 2014.
9
Costs and benefits of priming for defense in Arabidopsis.拟南芥防御引发的成本与效益
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 4;103(14):5602-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510213103. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
10
Epigenetic Control of Defense Signaling and Priming in Plants.植物防御信号传导与引发的表观遗传调控
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Aug 11;7:1201. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01201. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
and Differentially Elicit Systemic Transcriptional Expression of Polyphenol Biosynthetic Pathways Genes in Sunflower.并在向日葵中差异化诱导多酚生物合成途径基因的系统转录表达。
Biomolecules. 2020 Mar 1;10(3):379. doi: 10.3390/biom10030379.

本文引用的文献

1
Applications of Information Theory to Epidemiology.信息论在流行病学中的应用。
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Dec 9;22(12):1392. doi: 10.3390/e22121392.
2
A MODEL OF INDUCIBLE DEFENSE.一种诱导防御模型。
Evolution. 1993 Feb;47(1):325-327. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01223.x.
3
The fitness value of information.信息的适应值。
Oikos. 2010 Feb;119(2):219-230. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17781.x.
4
Controlling crop diseases using induced resistance: challenges for the future.利用诱导抗性控制作物病害:未来的挑战。
J Exp Bot. 2013 Mar;64(5):1263-80. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert026. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
5
Game theory and plant ecology.博弈论与植物生态学。
Ecol Lett. 2013 Apr;16(4):545-55. doi: 10.1111/ele.12071. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
6
Perceptions of disease risk: from social construction of subjective judgments to rational decision making.疾病风险认知:从主观判断的社会建构到理性决策
Phytopathology. 2011 Jun;101(6):654-65. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-10-0126.
7
Application of game theory to the interaction between plant viruses during mixed infections.博弈论在植物病毒混合感染期间相互作用中的应用。
J Gen Virol. 2009 Nov;90(Pt 11):2815-2820. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.012351-0. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
8
Induced resistance for plant disease control: maximizing the efficacy of resistance elicitors.诱导植物抗病性防治:最大程度发挥抗病激发子的功效。
Phytopathology. 2005 Dec;95(12):1368-73. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-95-1368.
9
Pitch canker disease of pines.松瘤锈病。
Phytopathology. 2006 Jun;96(6):657-9. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0657.
10
Fitness benefits of systemic acquired resistance during Hyaloperonospora parasitica infection in Arabidopsis thaliana.拟南芥受寄生霜霉感染期间系统获得性抗性的健康益处。
Genetics. 2006 Jul;173(3):1621-8. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.059022. Epub 2006 Apr 30.