• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于工厂校准的低成本土壤水分传感器的准确性

On the Accuracy of Factory-Calibrated Low-Cost Soil Water Content Sensors.

作者信息

Domínguez-Niño Jesús María, Bogena Heye Reemt, Huisman Johan Alexander, Schilling Bernd, Casadesús Jaume

机构信息

Program of Efficient Use of Water in Agriculture, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Parc de Gardeny (PCiTAL), Fruitcentre, 25003 Lleida, Spain.

Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, Agrosphere Institute (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 13;19(14):3101. doi: 10.3390/s19143101.

DOI:10.3390/s19143101
PMID:31337053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6679572/
Abstract

Soil water content (SWC) monitoring is often used to optimize agricultural irrigation. Commonly, capacitance sensors are used for this task. However, the factory calibrations have been often criticized for their limited accuracy. The aim of this paper is to test the degree of improvement of various sensor- and soil-specific calibration options compared to factory calibrations by taking the 10HS sensor as an example. To this end, a two-step sensor calibration was carried out. In the first step, the sensor response was related to dielectric permittivity using calibration in media with well-defined permittivity. The second step involved the establishment of a site-specific relationship between permittivity and soil water content using undisturbed soil samples and time domain reflectometry (TDR) measurements. Our results showed that a model, which considered the mean porosity and a fitted dielectric permittivity of the solid phase for each soil and depth, provided the best fit between bulk permittivity and SWC. Most importantly, it was found that the two-step calibration approach (RMSE: 1.03 vol.%) provided more accurate SWC estimates compared to the factory calibration (RMSE: 5.33 vol.%). Finally, we used these calibrations on data from drip-irrigated almond and apple orchards and compared the factory calibration with our two-step calibration approach.

摘要

土壤含水量(SWC)监测常用于优化农业灌溉。通常,电容式传感器用于此任务。然而,工厂校准常常因其有限的精度而受到批评。本文的目的是以10HS传感器为例,测试与工厂校准相比,各种传感器和土壤特定校准选项的改进程度。为此,进行了两步传感器校准。第一步,使用在具有明确介电常数的介质中进行校准,将传感器响应与介电常数相关联。第二步涉及使用原状土样和时域反射仪(TDR)测量,建立介电常数与土壤含水量之间的特定地点关系。我们的结果表明,一个考虑了每种土壤和深度的平均孔隙率以及固相拟合介电常数的模型,在体积介电常数和土壤含水量之间提供了最佳拟合。最重要的是,发现两步校准方法(均方根误差:1.03体积%)与工厂校准(均方根误差:5.33体积%)相比,能提供更准确的土壤含水量估计。最后,我们将这些校准应用于滴灌杏仁园和苹果园的数据,并将工厂校准与我们的两步校准方法进行了比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/6575da00cc28/sensors-19-03101-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/2ca07e68a4b2/sensors-19-03101-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/7d31ae5ee737/sensors-19-03101-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/ca0c8293d00d/sensors-19-03101-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/3b22653152d7/sensors-19-03101-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/fce751b2fd4a/sensors-19-03101-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/f4a9d13f3570/sensors-19-03101-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/83b75f8fb906/sensors-19-03101-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/9a3c6d389a50/sensors-19-03101-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/41c64fcfc84b/sensors-19-03101-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/6575da00cc28/sensors-19-03101-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/2ca07e68a4b2/sensors-19-03101-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/7d31ae5ee737/sensors-19-03101-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/ca0c8293d00d/sensors-19-03101-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/3b22653152d7/sensors-19-03101-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/fce751b2fd4a/sensors-19-03101-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/f4a9d13f3570/sensors-19-03101-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/83b75f8fb906/sensors-19-03101-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/9a3c6d389a50/sensors-19-03101-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/41c64fcfc84b/sensors-19-03101-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/6679572/6575da00cc28/sensors-19-03101-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
On the Accuracy of Factory-Calibrated Low-Cost Soil Water Content Sensors.关于工厂校准的低成本土壤水分传感器的准确性
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 13;19(14):3101. doi: 10.3390/s19143101.
2
Temperature-Corrected Calibration of GS3 and TEROS-12 Soil Water Content Sensors.GS3和TEROS-12土壤水分传感器的温度校正校准
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 1;24(3):952. doi: 10.3390/s24030952.
3
Effective Calibration of Low-Cost Soil Water Content Sensors.低成本土壤水分传感器的有效校准
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jan 21;17(1):208. doi: 10.3390/s17010208.
4
Laboratory Performance of Five Selected Soil Moisture Sensors Applying Factory and Own Calibration Equations for Two Soil Media of Different Bulk Density and Salinity Levels.针对两种不同容重和盐度水平的土壤介质,应用工厂校准方程和自有校准方程的五种选定土壤湿度传感器的实验室性能。
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Nov 15;16(11):1912. doi: 10.3390/s16111912.
5
Laboratory Calibration and Field Validation of Soil Water Content and Salinity Measurements Using the 5TE Sensor.使用 5TE 传感器对土壤水分和盐分测量进行实验室校准和现场验证。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Nov 29;19(23):5272. doi: 10.3390/s19235272.
6
Analysis of the Variability in Soil Moisture Measurements by Capacitance Sensors in a Drip-Irrigated Orchard.电容传感器在滴灌果园土壤湿度测量中的变异性分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 7;20(18):5100. doi: 10.3390/s20185100.
7
Soil moisture sensing via swept frequency based microwave sensors.基于扫频的微波传感器进行土壤湿度感测。
Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(1):753-67. doi: 10.3390/s120100753. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
8
Laboratory Calibration and Performance Evaluation of Low-Cost Capacitive and Very Low-Cost Resistive Soil Moisture Sensors.低成本电容式和超低成本电阻式土壤水分传感器的实验室校准和性能评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 8;20(2):363. doi: 10.3390/s20020363.
9
A Seven-Rod Dielectric Sensor for Determination of Soil Moisture in Well-Defined Sample Volumes.一种用于确定特定样本体积土壤湿度的七杆介电传感器。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Apr 6;19(7):1646. doi: 10.3390/s19071646.
10
An Investigation of the Accuracy of EC5 and 5TE Capacitance Sensors for Soil Moisture Monitoring in Urban Soils-Laboratory and Field Calibration.城市土壤中 EC5 和 5TE 电容传感器土壤湿度监测的精度研究——实验室和野外标定。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 14;20(22):6510. doi: 10.3390/s20226510.

引用本文的文献

1
Calibration and Performance Evaluation of Cost-Effective Capacitive Moisture Sensor in Slope Model Experiments.斜坡模型实验中低成本电容式湿度传感器的校准与性能评估
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 20;24(24):8156. doi: 10.3390/s24248156.
2
Temperature-Corrected Calibration of GS3 and TEROS-12 Soil Water Content Sensors.GS3和TEROS-12土壤水分传感器的温度校正校准
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 1;24(3):952. doi: 10.3390/s24030952.
3
Evaluation of Three Soil Moisture Profile Sensors Using Laboratory and Field Experiments.利用实验室和田间试验对三种土壤水分剖面传感器进行评估

本文引用的文献

1
Effective Calibration of Low-Cost Soil Water Content Sensors.低成本土壤水分传感器的有效校准
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jan 21;17(1):208. doi: 10.3390/s17010208.
2
Laboratory Performance of Five Selected Soil Moisture Sensors Applying Factory and Own Calibration Equations for Two Soil Media of Different Bulk Density and Salinity Levels.针对两种不同容重和盐度水平的土壤介质,应用工厂校准方程和自有校准方程的五种选定土壤湿度传感器的实验室性能。
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Nov 15;16(11):1912. doi: 10.3390/s16111912.
3
Low-Cost Soil Moisture Profile Probe Using Thin-Film Capacitors and a Capacitive Touch Sensor.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;23(14):6581. doi: 10.3390/s23146581.
4
Recent Developments in Wireless Soil Moisture Sensing to Support Scientific Research and Agricultural Management.无线土壤湿度传感技术的最新进展,以支持科学研究和农业管理。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 13;22(24):9792. doi: 10.3390/s22249792.
5
A Low-Power IoT Device for Measuring Water Table Levels and Soil Moisture to Ease Increased Crop Yields.一种用于测量地下水位和土壤湿度的低功耗物联网设备,以提高作物产量。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 9;22(18):6840. doi: 10.3390/s22186840.
6
Soil Moisture a Posteriori Measurements Enhancement Using Ensemble Learning.利用集成学习增强土壤湿度后验测量。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 17;22(12):4591. doi: 10.3390/s22124591.
7
Comparison of the Moist Material Relative Permittivity Readouts Using the Non-Invasive Reflectometric Sensors and Microwave Antenna.使用非侵入式反射传感器和微波天线对湿物料相对介电常数读数的比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 10;22(10):3622. doi: 10.3390/s22103622.
8
Energy-Efficient Wireless Communication Strategy for Precision Agriculture Irrigation Control.节能型无线通信策略在精准农业灌溉控制中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 18;21(16):5541. doi: 10.3390/s21165541.
9
Analysis of the Variability in Soil Moisture Measurements by Capacitance Sensors in a Drip-Irrigated Orchard.电容传感器在滴灌果园土壤湿度测量中的变异性分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 7;20(18):5100. doi: 10.3390/s20185100.
10
Dielectric Properties of Glass Beads with Talc as a Reference Material for Calibration and Verification of Dielectric Methods and Devices for Measuring Soil Moisture.以滑石粉为参考材料的玻璃珠的介电特性,用于校准和验证测量土壤湿度的介电方法及设备。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 23;13(8):1968. doi: 10.3390/ma13081968.
使用薄膜电容器和电容式触摸传感器的低成本土壤湿度剖面探头。
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Aug 15;16(8):1292. doi: 10.3390/s16081292.
4
Soil Water Content Sensor Response to Organic Matter Content under Laboratory Conditions.实验室条件下土壤水分传感器对有机质含量的响应
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Aug 5;16(8):1239. doi: 10.3390/s16081239.