Nieberding Felix, Huisman Johan Alexander, Huebner Christof, Schilling Bernd, Weuthen Ansgar, Bogena Heye Reemt
Agrosphere Institute (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
TRUEBNER GmbH, 67435 Neustadt, Germany.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;23(14):6581. doi: 10.3390/s23146581.
Soil moisture profile sensors (SMPSs) have a high potential for climate-smart agriculture due to their easy handling and ability to perform simultaneous measurements at different depths. To date, an accurate and easy-to-use method for the evaluation of long SMPSs is not available. In this study, we developed laboratory and field experiments to evaluate three different SMPSs (SoilVUE10, Drill&Drop, and SMT500) in terms of measurement accuracy, sensor-to-sensor variability, and temperature stability. The laboratory experiment features a temperature-controlled lysimeter to evaluate intra-sensor variability and temperature stability of SMPSs. The field experiment features a water level-controlled sandbox and reference TDR measurements to evaluate the soil water measurement accuracy of the SMPS. In both experiments, a well-characterized fine sand was used as measurement medium to ensure homogeneous dielectric properties in the measurement domain of the sensors. The laboratory experiments with the lysimeter showed that the Drill&Drop sensor has the highest temperature sensitivity with a decrease of 0.014 m m per 10 °C, but at the same time showed the lowest intra- and inter-sensor variability. The field experiment with the sandbox showed that all three SMPSs have a similar performance (average RMSE ≈ 0.023 m m) with higher uncertainties at intermediate soil moisture contents. The presented combination of laboratory and field tests were found to be well suited to evaluate the performance of SMPSs and will be used to test additional SMPSs in the future.
土壤湿度剖面传感器(SMPSs)因其操作简便且能够在不同深度同时进行测量,在气候智能型农业中具有很高的潜力。迄今为止,尚无一种准确且易于使用的方法来评估长SMPSs。在本研究中,我们开展了实验室和田间试验,以评估三种不同的SMPSs(SoilVUE10、Drill&Drop和SMT500)在测量精度、传感器间变异性和温度稳定性方面的表现。实验室试验采用温度控制的蒸渗仪来评估SMPSs的传感器内部变异性和温度稳定性。田间试验采用水位控制的沙箱和参考TDR测量来评估SMPSs的土壤水分测量精度。在这两个试验中,均使用特性良好的细砂作为测量介质,以确保传感器测量域内介电特性均匀。蒸渗仪的实验室试验表明,Drill&Drop传感器温度敏感性最高,每10°C下降0.014 mm,但同时传感器内部和传感器之间的变异性最低。沙箱的田间试验表明,所有三种SMPSs性能相似(平均RMSE≈0.023 mm),在中等土壤湿度含量时不确定性更高。结果发现,所呈现的实验室和田间测试相结合的方法非常适合评估SMPSs的性能,并将在未来用于测试更多的SMPSs。