• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

道德准则和立场声明是否有助于指导澳大利亚移民拘留中心的道德决策?

Do codes of ethics and position statements help guide ethical decision making in Australian immigration detention centres?

机构信息

The University of Greenwich, London, UK.

Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 23;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0392-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-019-0392-8
PMID:31337376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6652001/
Abstract

Australian immigration detention has been called state sanctioned abuse and a crime against humanity. The Australian healthcare community has been closely involved with these policies, calling for their reform and working within detention centres to provide healthcare. As well as having a devastating impact on health, immigration detention changes the scope and nature of healthcare, with its delivery described as a Sisyphean task. In this article I will explore the guidance that is available to clinicians who work within detention centres and argue that codes, guidelines and positions statements provide little help in relation to ethical decision making. First I will outline guidance that can be found in codes of ethics and position statements, focusing on particularly relevant principles, such as advocacy, clinical independence and the clinicians' relationship to human rights. I will then highlight the disparity between this guidance and the delivery of healthcare within detention by drawing on the testimony of clinicians who formerly worked in these environments. While this disparity should be cause for alarm and at a minimum call into question how codes and positions statements are being used (if at all), there are more fundamental reasons why codes and position statements fail to provide guidance in these circumstances. I will outline a more general criticism of codes of ethics and use this to suggest a way forward, including looking beyond codes and position statements to guide action within Australian immigration detention.

摘要

澳大利亚的移民拘留被称为国家批准的虐待和反人类罪。澳大利亚医疗保健界一直密切关注这些政策,呼吁对其进行改革,并在拘留中心内提供医疗服务。移民拘留不仅对健康造成了破坏性影响,还改变了医疗保健的范围和性质,其提供的医疗服务被描述为一项西西弗斯式的任务。在本文中,我将探讨在拘留中心工作的临床医生所获得的指导,并认为规范、准则和立场声明在伦理决策方面几乎没有帮助。首先,我将概述职业道德准则和立场声明中可以找到的指导,重点关注特别相关的原则,如倡导、临床独立性以及临床医生与人权的关系。然后,我将通过引用以前在这些环境中工作的临床医生的证词,突出这种指导与拘留中心医疗服务之间的差距。虽然这种差距应该引起警惕,至少应该质疑规范和立场声明的使用方式(如果有的话),但在这些情况下,规范和立场声明未能提供指导还有更根本的原因。我将概述对道德规范的更普遍批评,并以此提出一种前进的方式,包括超越规范和立场声明,指导澳大利亚移民拘留中的行动。

相似文献

1
Do codes of ethics and position statements help guide ethical decision making in Australian immigration detention centres?道德准则和立场声明是否有助于指导澳大利亚移民拘留中心的道德决策?
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 23;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0392-8.
2
A Community Standard: Equivalency of Healthcare in Australian Immigration Detention.一项社区标准:澳大利亚移民拘留中心医疗保健的等效性
J Immigr Minor Health. 2017 Aug;19(4):974-981. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0438-7.
3
Resistance and the delivery of healthcare in Australian immigration detention centres.澳大利亚移民拘留中心的耐药性和医疗保健服务提供。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2023 Dec;41(Suppl 1):82-95. doi: 10.1007/s40592-023-00182-y. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
4
Between Resistance and Complicity, the Australian Healthcare Community and 30 Years of Immigration Detention.在抵抗与共谋之间:澳大利亚医疗保健界与 30 年移民拘留。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Dec;24(6):1599-1601. doi: 10.1007/s10903-022-01389-7. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
Nursing in asylum seeker detention in Australia: care, rights and witnessing.澳大利亚寻求庇护者拘留中心的护理:关怀、权利和见证。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Sep;35(9):546-51. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.029827.
6
Medical advocacy in the face of Australian immigration practices: A study of medical professionals defending the health rights of detained refugees and asylum seekers.面对澳大利亚移民政策,医学倡导:研究医学专业人员捍卫被拘留的难民和寻求庇护者的健康权利。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0237776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237776. eCollection 2020.
7
The need for a rights-based public health approach to Australian asylum seeker health.对澳大利亚寻求庇护者健康问题采取基于权利的公共卫生方法的必要性。
Public Health Rev. 2016 Aug 22;37:6. doi: 10.1186/s40985-016-0020-9. eCollection 2016.
8
Detention and deception: limits of ethical acceptability in detention research.拘留与欺骗:拘留研究中道德可接受性的限度
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2004 Oct;23(4):69-77. doi: 10.1007/BF03351421.
9
Healthcare and complicity in Australian immigration detention.澳大利亚移民拘留中的医疗保健与同谋行为。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2016 Jun;34(2):136-147. doi: 10.1007/s40592-016-0066-y.
10
Moral injury related to immigration detention on Nauru: a qualitative study.移民拘留所中的道德伤害:一项定性研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Feb 24;13(1):2029042. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2029042. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Challenges in Oral Healthcare Services Provided by Non-Governmental Organizations for Refugees in Germany.德国非政府组织为难民提供口腔医疗保健服务时面临的伦理挑战。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Sep;21(3):491-500. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10327-7. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
2
Resistance and the delivery of healthcare in Australian immigration detention centres.澳大利亚移民拘留中心的耐药性和医疗保健服务提供。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2023 Dec;41(Suppl 1):82-95. doi: 10.1007/s40592-023-00182-y. Epub 2023 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Should clinicians boycott Australian immigration detention?临床医生是否应该抵制澳大利亚移民拘留?
J Med Ethics. 2019 Feb;45(2):79-83. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105153. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
2
Revising the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists code of ethics.修订澳大利亚和新西兰皇家精神科医学院伦理准则。
Australas Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;26(5):456-459. doi: 10.1177/1039856218789791. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
3
Mental health of children and adolescents in Australian alternate places of immigration detention.澳大利亚移民拘留替代场所中儿童和青少年的心理健康
J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Jun;53(6):525-528. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13538. Epub 2017 May 9.
4
Healthcare and complicity in Australian immigration detention.澳大利亚移民拘留中的医疗保健与同谋行为。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2016 Jun;34(2):136-147. doi: 10.1007/s40592-016-0066-y.
5
A Community Standard: Equivalency of Healthcare in Australian Immigration Detention.一项社区标准:澳大利亚移民拘留中心医疗保健的等效性
J Immigr Minor Health. 2017 Aug;19(4):974-981. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0438-7.
6
Torture, healthcare and Australian immigration detention.酷刑、医疗保健与澳大利亚移民拘留
J Med Ethics. 2016 Jul;42(7):418-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103387. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
7
The Health Care Consequences Of Australian Immigration Policies.澳大利亚移民政策对医疗保健的影响
PLoS Med. 2016 Feb 16;13(2):e1001960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001960. eCollection 2016 Feb.
8
Are healthcare professionals working in Australia's immigration detention centres condoning torture?在澳大利亚移民拘留中心工作的医护人员是在纵容酷刑吗?
J Med Ethics. 2016 Jul;42(7):413-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103066. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
9
Ethics, Foreseeability, and Tragedy in Australian Immigration Detention.澳大利亚移民拘留中的伦理、可预测性与悲剧
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Dec;12(4):537-9. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9676-y. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
10
The Royal Australasian College of Physicians position statement on refugee and asylum seeker health.澳大利亚皇家内科医师学会关于难民和寻求庇护者健康的立场声明。
Med J Aust. 2015 Aug 17;203(4):176-7. doi: 10.5694/mja15.00593.