North Dublin City GP Training Scheme, Dublin 7, Ireland.
University of Bath, Dublin 7, Ireland.
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jul 23;18(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1002-6.
Homeless people have poor health and mortality indices. Despite this they make poor usage of health services. This study sought to understand why they use health services differently from the domiciled population.
Ethnographic observations were conducted at several homeless services, in Dublin. This was supplemented with 47 semi-structured interviews with homeless people and two focus groups of homeless people and hospital doctors. A critical-realist approach was adopted for interpretation of the data.
Homeless people tended to present late in their illness; default early from treatment; have low usage of primary-care, preventative and outpatient services; have high usage of Emergency and Inpatient services; and poor compliance with medication. They tended to avoid psychiatric services. A number of external barriers were identified. These were classified as physical (distance) administrative (application process for medical care; appointments; queues; the management of addiction in hospital; rules of service; and information providing processes); and attitudinal (stigma; differing attitudes as to appropriate use of services. A new form of barrier, Conversations of Exclusion was identified and described. Internalised barriers were identified which were in nature, either cognitive (fatalistic, denial, deferral to future, presumption of poor treatment or discrimination, self blame and survival cognitions) or emotional (fear; embarrassment, hopelessness and poor self-esteem). Generative mechanisms for these factors were identified which either affected participants prior to homelessness (marginalization causing hopelessness, familial dysfunction, substance misuse, fear of authority, illiteracy; mental health; and poor English) or after becoming homeless (homelessness; ubiquity of premature death; substance misuse; prioritization of survival over health; threat of violence; chaotic nature of homelessness; negative experiences of authority; and stigma.
An explanatory critical realist model integrating the identified generative mechanisms, external and internalised barriers was developed to explain why the Health service Utilization of homeless people differs from the domiciled populations. This new model has implications for health service policy makers and providers in how they design and deliver accessible health services to homeless people.
无家可归者的健康状况和死亡率指标较差。尽管如此,他们对卫生服务的利用仍然很差。本研究旨在了解他们为何与有住所的人群使用卫生服务方式不同。
在都柏林的几个无家可归者服务机构进行了民族志观察。此外,还对无家可归者进行了 47 次半结构化访谈,并对无家可归者和医院医生进行了两次焦点小组讨论。采用关键现实主义方法对数据进行解释。
无家可归者在患病后期就诊;在治疗早期退出;初级保健、预防和门诊服务利用率低;急诊和住院服务利用率高;药物依从性差。他们往往回避精神科服务。确定了一些外部障碍。这些障碍分为物理障碍(距离)、行政障碍(医疗保健申请流程;预约;排队;医院成瘾管理;服务规则;以及信息提供流程)和态度障碍(耻辱感;对服务的适当使用的不同态度。确定并描述了一种新形式的障碍,即排斥性对话。确定了内在障碍,这些障碍在性质上要么是认知的(宿命论、否认、推迟到未来、推定治疗或歧视差、自责和生存认知),要么是情感的(恐惧;尴尬、绝望和自尊心差)。确定了这些因素的生成机制,这些机制要么在成为无家可归者之前影响参与者(边缘化导致绝望、家庭功能障碍、药物滥用、对权威的恐惧、文盲;心理健康;和英语水平低),要么在成为无家可归者之后影响参与者(无家可归;早逝的普遍性;药物滥用;生存优先于健康;暴力威胁;无家可归的混乱性质;对权威的负面经历;和耻辱感。
为了解释为什么无家可归者的卫生服务利用与有住所的人群不同,开发了一个综合确定的生成机制、外部和内在障碍的解释性关键现实主义模型。这个新模型对卫生服务政策制定者和提供者在如何为无家可归者设计和提供可及的卫生服务方面具有启示意义。