• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤中心优化前后的创伤救治:拯救生命的改变。

Trauma care before and after optimisation in a level I trauma Centre: Life-saving changes.

机构信息

Brabant Trauma Registry, Network Emergency Care Brabant, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, ETZ Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

Brabant Trauma Registry, Network Emergency Care Brabant, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Injury. 2019 Oct;50(10):1678-1683. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2019.07.017
PMID:31337494
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The implementation of trauma systems has led to a significant reduction in mortality and length of hospital stay. In our level I trauma centre, 24/7 in-hospital coverage was implemented, and a renovation of the trauma room took place to improve the trauma care. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of the optimised in-hospital infrastructure in terms of mortality, processes and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. All adult trauma patients admitted to our trauma centre directly during two time periods (2010-2012 and 2014-2016) were included. Any patients below the age of 18 years and patients who underwent primary trauma screening in another hospital were excluded. Logistic and linear regression were used and adjusted for demographics and characteristics of trauma. The primary endpoint was mortality. The secondary endpoints were subgroups of earlier mortality rates and severely injured patients, processes and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

In period I, 1290 patients were included, and in period II, 2421. The adjusted mortality in the trauma room (odds ratio (OR): 0.18; CI: 0.05-0.63) and the total in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.63 CI: 0.42-0.95) showed a significant reduction in period II. The trauma room (TR) time decreased by 30 min (p < 0.001), and the time until CT decreased by 22 min (p < 0.001). The number of delayed diagnoses and complications were significantly lower in the second period, with an OR of 0.2 (CI: 0.1-0.2) and 0.4 (CI: 0.3-0.6), respectively. The hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay decreased significantly, -1.5 day (p = 0.010) and -1.8 days (p = 0.022) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimisation of the in-hospital infrastructure related to trauma care resulted in improved survival rates in both severely injured patients as well as in the whole trauma population. Moreover, the processes and clinical outcomes improved, showing a shorter hospital length of stay, shorter TR time, fewer complications and fewer delayed diagnoses.

摘要

背景

创伤系统的实施显著降低了死亡率和住院时间。在我们的一级创伤中心,实行了 24/7 的院内覆盖,并对创伤室进行了翻新,以改善创伤护理。本研究的目的是检查优化院内基础设施对死亡率、过程和临床结果的影响。

方法

我们对前瞻性收集的数据进行了回顾性队列研究。所有直接入住我们创伤中心的成年创伤患者均包括在内。排除年龄在 18 岁以下的患者和在另一家医院进行初次创伤筛查的患者。使用逻辑和线性回归,并根据人口统计学和创伤特征进行调整。主要终点是死亡率。次要终点是早期死亡率和重伤患者亚组、过程和临床结果。

结果

在第一阶段,纳入了 1290 名患者,在第二阶段,纳入了 2421 名患者。创伤室(比值比(OR):0.18;CI:0.05-0.63)和总院内死亡率(OR:0.63 CI:0.42-0.95)的调整死亡率在第二阶段显著降低。创伤室(TR)时间减少了 30 分钟(p<0.001),CT 时间减少了 22 分钟(p<0.001)。第二阶段的延迟诊断和并发症数量显著减少,分别为 0.2(CI:0.1-0.2)和 0.4(CI:0.3-0.6)。住院时间和 ICU 住院时间分别显著减少了 1.5 天(p=0.010)和 1.8 天(p=0.022)。

结论

与创伤护理相关的院内基础设施的优化导致重伤患者和整个创伤人群的生存率提高。此外,过程和临床结果得到改善,表现为住院时间缩短、TR 时间缩短、并发症减少和延迟诊断减少。

相似文献

1
Trauma care before and after optimisation in a level I trauma Centre: Life-saving changes.创伤中心优化前后的创伤救治:拯救生命的改变。
Injury. 2019 Oct;50(10):1678-1683. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
2
Impact of an early mobilization protocol on outcomes in trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit: A retrospective pre-post study.早期活动方案对 ICU 收治创伤患者结局的影响:回顾性前后研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Apr;88(4):515-521. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002588.
3
Evaluation of trauma care in a mature level I trauma center in the Netherlands: outcomes in a Dutch mature level I trauma center.荷兰成熟 I 级创伤中心创伤救治评估:荷兰成熟 I 级创伤中心的结局。
World J Surg. 2013 Oct;37(10):2353-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2103-9.
4
Direct transport to tertiary trauma centers versus transfer from lower level facilities: impact on mortality and morbidity among patients with major trauma.直接转运至三级创伤中心与从较低级别医疗机构转运:对严重创伤患者死亡率和发病率的影响。
J Trauma. 1997 Aug;43(2):288-95; discussion 295-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199708000-00014.
5
Influence of in-house attending presence on trauma outcomes and hospital efficiency.院内主治医生在场对创伤结局和医院效率的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Apr;218(4):734-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.027. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
6
Effect of the localisation of the CT scanner during trauma resuscitation on survival -- a retrospective, multicentre study.创伤复苏期间CT扫描仪定位对生存率的影响——一项回顾性多中心研究
Injury. 2014 Oct;45 Suppl 3:S76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.022.
7
The volume-outcome relationship among severely injured patients admitted to English major trauma centres: a registry study.收治于英国大型创伤中心的严重创伤患者的量效关系:一项注册研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Mar 6;28(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-0710-7.
8
Trauma care regionalization: a process-outcome evaluation.创伤护理区域化:一项过程-结果评估
J Trauma. 1999 Apr;46(4):565-79; discussion 579-81. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199904000-00004.
9
Definitive care in level 3 trauma centres after severe injury: A comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes.重伤后三级创伤中心的确定性治疗:临床特征与结局比较
Injury. 2015 Sep;46(9):1790-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.047. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
10
Influence of access to an integrated trauma system on in-hospital mortality and length of stay.获得综合创伤系统对院内死亡率和住院时间的影响。
Injury. 2015 Jul;46(7):1257-61. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.024. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Literature Review of Trauma Systems: An Operations Management Perspective.创伤系统的系统文献综述:运营管理视角
Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2025 Jan 16;14:27536351241310645. doi: 10.1177/27536351241310645. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Recovery to normal vital functions and acid-base status after a severe trauma in Level I versus Level II Trauma Centres.Ⅰ级与Ⅱ级创伤中心严重创伤后恢复正常生命功能和酸碱状态的比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Apr;50(2):513-522. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02390-x. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
3
[Indicators to measure the performance of emergency trauma care].
[衡量急诊创伤护理绩效的指标]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Nov 6;61(6):819-840. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10064412.
4
Psychological risk factors that characterize the trajectories of quality of life after a physical trauma: a longitudinal study using latent class analysis.心理风险因素可描绘身体创伤后生活质量的轨迹:使用潜在类别分析的纵向研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 May;30(5):1317-1335. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02740-x. Epub 2021 Jan 14.