• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[衡量急诊创伤护理绩效的指标]

[Indicators to measure the performance of emergency trauma care].

作者信息

Vera-López Juan Daniel, Heredia-Pi Ileana Beatriz, Pérez-Núñez Ricardo, Hijar Martha

机构信息

Escuela de Salud Pública de México, Doctorado en Ciencias en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.

Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.

出版信息

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Nov 6;61(6):819-840. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10064412.

DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10064412
PMID:37995348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10721338/
Abstract

The objective of this paper was to identify the main indicators used to measure the performance in emergency trauma care. A literature review was carried out in the electronic databases: PubMEd, LILACS and Epistemónikos, including publications between January 2011 and December 31, 2021, in Spanish, English and Portuguese. A total of 962 publications were identified. When reviewing the full text, 48 articles were included. The indicators were classified in the dimensions of process and results. 100 different indicators were identified to analyze the performance of emergency trauma care. 71% were process indicators, including service time and triage. In the results dimension 29 indicators were identified; mortality was the indicator most analyzed as well as length of stay. Six indicators on the disability of injured people and 14 indicators related to satisfaction were identified, the most frequent being complaints. Various indicators have been used to assess the performance of emergency trauma care. In the results dimension, the indicators related to satisfaction and disability after injuries have been little explored. Decision-makers and those responsible for emergency care must promote performance evaluation exercises to learn about their current situation using appropriate and sensitive indicators with the available data.

摘要

本文的目的是确定用于衡量急诊创伤护理绩效的主要指标。在电子数据库PubMEd、LILACS和Epistemónikos中进行了文献综述,纳入了2011年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间以西班牙语、英语和葡萄牙语发表的文献。共识别出962篇出版物。在审阅全文时,纳入了48篇文章。这些指标在过程和结果维度上进行了分类。共识别出100个不同的指标来分析急诊创伤护理的绩效。71%是过程指标,包括服务时间和分诊。在结果维度上识别出29个指标;死亡率是分析最多的指标以及住院时间。识别出了6个关于伤者残疾的指标和14个与满意度相关的指标,最常见的是投诉。已经使用了各种指标来评估急诊创伤护理的绩效。在结果维度上,与伤者满意度和残疾相关的指标研究较少。决策者和负责急诊护理的人员必须推动绩效评估工作,以便利用现有数据使用适当且敏感的指标了解其当前状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f21/10721338/2bd59c02f461/04435117-61-6-819-c001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f21/10721338/61ecfde661ac/04435117-61-6-819-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f21/10721338/6f6d7f673d63/04435117-61-6-819-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f21/10721338/2bd59c02f461/04435117-61-6-819-c001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f21/10721338/61ecfde661ac/04435117-61-6-819-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f21/10721338/6f6d7f673d63/04435117-61-6-819-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f21/10721338/2bd59c02f461/04435117-61-6-819-c001.jpg

相似文献

1
[Indicators to measure the performance of emergency trauma care].[衡量急诊创伤护理绩效的指标]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Nov 6;61(6):819-840. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10064412.
2
Not All Discharge Settings Are Created Equal: Thirty-Day Readmission Risk after Elective Colorectal Surgery.并非所有出院环境都相同:择期结直肠手术后 30 天再入院风险。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Sep;63(9):1302-1309. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001727.
3
The Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) applied to clinical practice and research: an integrative review.姑息治疗结局量表(POS)在临床实践与研究中的应用:一项综合综述。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Aug 15;24:e2764. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.0993.2764.
4
Implementation of health care quality indicators for out-of-hospital emergencies: a systematic review.院外急救医疗质量指标的实施:系统评价。
Emergencias. 2019 Oct;31(5):346-352.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
[Professional satisfaction for doctors of the Mobile Emergency Team and the Emergency Coordinator Office 061. Region of Murcia].[穆尔西亚自治区061地区移动急救团队医生和急救协调办公室的职业满意度]
Rev Calid Asist. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
7
Trauma Registry of the Pan-American Trauma Society: One year of experience in two hospitals in southwest Colombia.泛美创伤协会创伤登记处:在哥伦比亚西南部两家医院的一年经验
Colomb Med (Cali). 2016 Sep 30;47(3):148-154.
8
9
Identifying performance indicators to measure overall performance of telephone triage - a scoping review.识别绩效指标以衡量电话分诊的整体绩效——范围综述。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Mar;42(1):38-50. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2283188. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
10
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.

本文引用的文献

1
Job Satisfaction and Performance Orientation of Paramedics in German Emergency Medical Services-A Nationwide Survey.德国急救医疗服务中急救人员的工作满意度和绩效导向——一项全国性调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;18(23):12459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312459.
2
Emergency Department Quality Dashboard; a Systematic Review of Performance Indicators, Functionalities, and Challenges.急诊科质量仪表盘;对绩效指标、功能及挑战的系统评价
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 17;9(1):e47. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1230. eCollection 2021.
3
An Evaluation of the Effect of Performance Improvement and Patient Safety Program Implemented in a New Regional Trauma Center of Korea.
韩国新区域性创伤中心实施的绩效改进和患者安全计划效果评估。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jun 7;36(22):e149. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e149.
4
Trauma outcomes for blunt and penetrating injuries by mode of transportation and day/night shift.交通方式和白班/夜班导致的钝器伤和穿透伤的创伤结局。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
5
The association between level of trauma care and clinical outcome measures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤救治水平与临床结局指标的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Oct;89(4):801-812. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002850.
6
Right Patient, Right Place, Right Time : Field Triage and Transfer to Level I Trauma Centers.合适的患者,合适的地点,合适的时间:现场分诊与一级创伤中心转移。
Am Surg. 2020 Dec;86(12):1697-1702. doi: 10.1177/0003134820947385. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
7
Right Patient, Right Place, Right Time: Field Triage and Transfer to Level I Trauma Centers.正确的患者、正确的地点、正确的时间:现场分诊及转运至一级创伤中心
Am Surg. 2020 May;86(5):400-406. doi: 10.1177/0003134820918249.
8
The off-hour effect in severe trauma and the structure of care delivery among Japanese emergency and critical care centers: A retrospective cohort study.严重创伤中的非工作时间效应和日本急救与重症监护中心的护理提供结构:一项回顾性队列研究。
Surgery. 2020 Mar;167(3):653-660. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
9
Musculoskeletal injury quality outcome indicators for the emergency department.肌肉骨骼损伤急诊质量结局指标。
Intern Emerg Med. 2020 Apr;15(3):501-514. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02234-w. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
10
Clinical emergency care research in low-income and middle-income countries: opportunities and challenges.低收入和中等收入国家的临床急诊护理研究:机遇与挑战。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jul 29;4(Suppl 6):e001289. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001289. eCollection 2019.