Kinesiology Program, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Departments of Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Biomech. 2019 Aug 27;93:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Biomechanics principally stems from two disciplines, mechanics and biology. However, both the application and language of the mechanical constructs are not always adhered to when applied to biological systems, which can lead to errors and misunderstandings within the scientific literature. Here we address three topics that seem to be common points of confusion and misconception, with a specific focus on sports biomechanics applications: (1) joint reaction forces as they pertain to loads actually experienced by biological joints; (2) the partitioning of scalar quantities into directional components; and (3) weight and gravity alteration. For each topic, we discuss how mechanical concepts have been commonly misapplied in peer-reviewed publications, the consequences of those misapplications, and how biomechanics, exercise science, and other related disciplines can collectively benefit by more carefully adhering to and applying concepts of classical mechanics.
生物力学主要源自力学和生物学两个学科。然而,在将力学结构应用于生物系统时,其应用和语言并不总是遵循力学的规则,这可能会导致科学文献中的错误和误解。在这里,我们将讨论三个似乎是常见混淆点和误解点的主题,并特别关注运动生物力学的应用:(1)关节反作用力与生物关节实际承受的载荷有关;(2)标量的分量分解成方向分量;(3)重量和重力的改变。对于每个主题,我们讨论了机械概念在同行评议的出版物中是如何被误用的,这些误用的后果,以及生物力学、运动科学和其他相关学科如何通过更仔细地遵循和应用经典力学的概念而共同受益。