• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性与慢性心肌损伤及长期预后。

Acute versus chronic myocardial injury and long-term outcomes.

机构信息

Functional Area of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, 14184, Stockholm.

Heart and Vascular Theme, Functional Area of Ischemic Heart Disease, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Heart. 2019 Dec;105(24):1905-1912. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315036. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315036
PMID:31337668
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of data regarding prognosis in patients with acute versus chronic myocardial injury for long-term outcomes. We hypothesised that patients with chronic myocardial injury have a similar long-term prognosis as patients with acute myocardial injury.

METHODS

In an observational cohort study of 22 589 patients who had high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) measured in the emergency department during 2011-2014, we identified all patients with level >14 ng/L and categorised them as acute myocardial injury, type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) or chronic myocardial injury through adjudication. We estimated adjusted HRs with 95% CIs for the primary outcome all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes MI, and heart failure in patients with acute myocardial injury, T1MI and T2MI compared with chronic myocardial injury.

RESULTS

In total, 3853 patients were included. During 3.9 (±2) years of follow-up, 48%, 24%, 44% and 49% of patients with acute myocardial injury, T1MI, T2MI and chronic myocardial injury died, respectively. Patients with acute myocardial injury had higher adjusted risks of death (1.21, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.36) and heart failure (1.24, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.43), but a similar risk for myocardial infarction (MI) compared with the reference group. Patients with T1MI had a lower adjusted risk of death (0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.00) and higher risk of MI (2.09, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.68), but a similar risk of heart failure. Patients with T2MI had a higher adjusted risk of death (1.46, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.80) and heart failure (1.30, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.69) compared with patients with chronic myocardial injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Absolute long-term risks for death are similar, and adjusted risks are slightly higher, among patients with acute myocardial injury and T2MI, respectively, compared with chronic myocardial injury. The lowest risk of long-term mortality was found in patients with T1MI. Both acute and chronic myocardial injury are associated with very high risks of adverse outcomes.

摘要

目的

关于急性与慢性心肌损伤患者的长期预后,相关数据较为匮乏。我们假设慢性心肌损伤患者的长期预后与急性心肌损伤患者相似。

方法

我们对 2011 年至 2014 年期间在急诊科接受高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T(hs-cTnT)检测的 22589 例患者进行了一项观察性队列研究,根据 14ng/L 以上的 hs-cTnT 值将所有患者分为急性心肌损伤、1 型心肌梗死(T1MI)、2 型心肌梗死(T2MI)或慢性心肌损伤。通过裁决将所有急性心肌损伤、T1MI 和 T2MI 患者分类为急性心肌损伤、1 型心肌梗死(T1MI)、2 型心肌梗死(T2MI)或慢性心肌损伤。我们估计了急性心肌损伤、T1MI 和 T2MI 患者与慢性心肌损伤患者相比的全因死亡率和次要结局心肌梗死(MI)、心力衰竭的主要结局所有原因死亡率的调整后 HR(95%CI)。

结果

共纳入 3853 例患者。在 3.9(±2)年的随访期间,急性心肌损伤、T1MI、T2MI 和慢性心肌损伤患者的死亡率分别为 48%、24%、44%和 49%。与对照组相比,急性心肌损伤患者的死亡(1.21,95%CI 1.08 至 1.36)和心力衰竭(1.24,95%CI 1.07 至 1.43)的调整后风险更高,但 MI 风险相似。T1MI 患者的死亡风险(0.86,95%CI 0.74 至 1.00)较低,MI(2.09,95%CI 1.62 至 2.68)风险较高,但心力衰竭风险相似。与慢性心肌损伤患者相比,T2MI 患者的死亡(1.46,95%CI 1.18 至 1.80)和心力衰竭(1.30,95%CI 1.00 至 1.69)的调整后风险更高。

结论

与慢性心肌损伤相比,急性心肌损伤和 T2MI 患者的绝对长期死亡风险相似,调整后的风险略高。T1MI 患者的长期死亡率最低。急性和慢性心肌损伤均与极高的不良结局风险相关。

相似文献

1
Acute versus chronic myocardial injury and long-term outcomes.急性与慢性心肌损伤及长期预后。
Heart. 2019 Dec;105(24):1905-1912. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315036. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
2
Incidence, Trends, and Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Community Cohort.2 型心肌梗死在社区队列中的发病率、趋势和结局。
Circulation. 2020 Feb 11;141(6):454-463. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043100. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
3
Twelve-Month Outcomes of Patients With Myocardial Injury not Due to Type-1 Myocardial Infarction.非 1 型心肌梗死导致的心肌损伤患者的 12 个月结局。
Heart Lung Circ. 2023 Aug;32(8):978-985. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.04.299. Epub 2023 May 22.
4
Long-term prognosis of low high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in the emergency department compared with the general population.与一般人群相比,急诊科低高敏肌钙蛋白 T 的长期预后。
Heart. 2024 Jul 25;110(16):1040-1047. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-323913.
5
Cardiovascular Biomarkers in the Early Discrimination of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.心血管生物标志物在 2 型心肌梗死早期鉴别诊断中的应用。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jul 1;6(7):771-780. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0669.
6
Troponin elevation pattern and subsequent cardiac and non-cardiac outcomes: Implementing the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction and high-sensitivity troponin at a population level.肌钙蛋白升高模式及随后的心脏和非心脏结局:在人群水平实施心肌梗死的第四通用定义和高敏肌钙蛋白。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 12;16(3):e0248289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248289. eCollection 2021.
7
Relation of Chronic Myocardial Injury and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction to Mortality.慢性心肌损伤与非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死与死亡率的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 15;122(12):1989-1995. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
8
Diagnostic features, management and prognosis of type 2 myocardial infarction compared to type 1 myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与 1 型心肌梗死相比,2 型心肌梗死的诊断特征、治疗和预后:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 17;12(2):e055755. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055755.
9
Direct comparison of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I in the early differentiation of type 1 vs. type 2 myocardial infarction.高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T 和 I 在 1 型与 2 型心肌梗死早期鉴别诊断中的直接比较。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Jan 12;11(1):62-74. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab039.
10
Biomarkers Enhance Discrimination and Prognosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.生物标志物增强 2 型心肌梗死的鉴别和预后。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16):1532-1544. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046682. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of risk factors and development of predictive model for acute myocardial injury in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者急性心肌损伤的危险因素分析及预测模型的建立
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Apr 30;17(4):1977-1990. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-1992. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
2
Developing a Computational Phenotype of the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction for Inpatients.为住院患者开发心肌梗死第四次通用定义的计算表型。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 19;13(24):7773. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247773.
3
Acute Kidney Injury and High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Levels in the Emergency Department.
急诊科中的急性肾损伤与高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T 水平。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2419602. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19602.
4
Development of a prognostic nomogram for patients underwent extracorporeal circulation auxiliary to open cardiac surgery on hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study.体外循环辅助下心脏直视手术患者医院死亡率预后列线图的研制:一项回顾性队列研究
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4174-4185. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-24. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
5
Prognostic significance of the aspartate aminotransferase to lymphocyte ratio index in patients with acute myocardial infarction.天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶与淋巴细胞比值指数对急性心肌梗死患者的预后意义。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Jun;12(6):e1306. doi: 10.1002/iid3.1306.
6
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with symptomatic chronic myocardial injury in a Tanzanian emergency department: A prospective observational study.坦桑尼亚急诊科有症状的慢性心肌损伤患者的特征和结局:一项前瞻性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 1;19(5):e0296440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296440. eCollection 2024.
7
Application of the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction in Clinical Practice in Scotland and Sweden.苏格兰和瑞典临床实践中应用通用心肌梗死定义。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e245853. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5853.
8
Exploring Cardiac Exosomal RNAs of Acute Myocardial Infarction.探索急性心肌梗死的心脏外泌体RNA
Biomedicines. 2024 Feb 14;12(2):430. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12020430.
9
Long-term outcome of patients presenting with myocardial injury or myocardial infarction.出现心肌损伤或心肌梗死患者的长期预后。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jun;114(6):700-708. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02334-w. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
10
Improving Risk Stratification for Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.改善 2 型心肌梗死患者的风险分层。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Jan 17;81(2):156-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.025.