Suppr超能文献

在日本人群中,与其他抗糖尿病药物相比,二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂单药治疗相关的心血管风险:一项全国性队列研究。

Cardiovascular risks associated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors monotherapy compared with other antidiabetes drugs in the Japanese population: A nationwide cohort study.

作者信息

Komamine Maki, Kajiyama Kazuhiro, Ishiguro Chieko, Uyama Yoshiaki

机构信息

Office of Medical Informatics and Epidemiology, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Sep;28(9):1166-1174. doi: 10.1002/pds.4847. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We evaluated the cardiovascular risk associated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) as monotherapy compared with other antidiabetic drugs in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide cohort study involving 2 716 000 diabetes patients in Japan. New users of any antidiabetic drug as monotherapy between 1 April 2010 and 31 October 2014 were identified. Occurrences of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and stroke requiring hospitalization associated with DPP-4Is were compared with those associated with biguanides (BGs), sulfonylureas (SUs), or α-glucosidase inhibitors (α-GIs). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for these outcomes were estimated by Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score standardization was used to control for confounding.

RESULTS

We identified 1 105 103 patients using DPP-4Is, 278 280 patients using BGs, 273 449 patients using SUs, and 217 026 patients using α-GIs. The risks of MI and HF for DPP-4I users were significantly higher than those for BG users (MI: aHR, 1.48 [95%CI, 1.20-1.82], HF: aHR, 1.46 [95%CI, 1.31-1.62]), while significantly lower than those for SU users (MI: aHR, 0.84 [95%CI, 0.72-0.98], HF: aHR, 0.86 [95%CI, 0.81-0.92]). The risk of MI for DPP-4I users was similar to that for α-GI users, while the risk of HF for DPP-4I users was slightly higher than for α-GI users (MI: aHR, 0.98 [95%CI, 0.82-1.17], HF: aHR, 1.12[95%CI, 1.04-1.21]).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of MI and HF requiring hospitalization associated with DPP-4Is as monotherapy was significantly higher than BGs, significantly lower than SUs, and similar to α-GIs.

摘要

目的

我们评估了在日本,与其他抗糖尿病药物相比,二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4Is)作为单一疗法时的心血管风险。

方法

我们在日本开展了一项全国性队列研究,纳入了2716000名糖尿病患者。确定了2010年4月1日至2014年10月31日期间开始单一使用任何抗糖尿病药物的新使用者。将与DPP-4Is相关的心肌梗死(MI)、心力衰竭(HF)以及需住院治疗的中风的发生率,与与双胍类(BGs)、磺脲类(SUs)或α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂(α-GIs)相关的发生率进行比较。通过Cox比例风险模型估计这些结局的调整后风险比(aHRs)。采用倾向评分标准化来控制混杂因素。

结果

我们确定了1105103名使用DPP-4Is的患者、278280名使用BGs的患者、273449名使用SUs的患者以及217026名使用α-GIs的患者。DPP-4I使用者发生MI和HF的风险显著高于BG使用者(MI:aHR,1.48[95%CI,1.20 - 1.82],HF:aHR,1.46[95%CI,1.31 - 1.62]),而显著低于SU使用者(MI:aHR,0.84[95%CI,0.72 - 0.98],HF:aHR,0.86[95%CI,0.81 - 0.92])。DPP-4I使用者发生MI的风险与α-GI使用者相似,而DPP-4I使用者发生HF的风险略高于α-GI使用者(MI:aHR,0.98[95%CI,0.82 - 1.17],HF:aHR,1.12[95%CI,1.04 - 1.21])。

结论

DPP-4Is作为单一疗法时,需住院治疗的MI和HF风险显著高于BGs,显著低于SUs,且与α-GIs相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验