Diabetes and Metabolism Information Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Institute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Nov;15(11):1556-1565. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14281. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: A recent US Food and Drug Administration report highlighted concerns over nitrosamine (7-nitroso-3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro[1,2,4] triazolo-[4,3-a]pyrazine [NTTP]) impurities in sitagliptin, prompting investigations into its safety profile. The present study aimed to determine if the use of NTTP-contaminated sitagliptin, in comparison with other dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, is associated with an increased cancer risk.
This retrospective cohort study secondarily used the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan, encompassing data on >120 million individuals. The study involved patients who initiated DPP-4 inhibitor therapy (sitagliptin or other DPP-4 inhibitors) and continued its exclusive use for 3 years. Sitagliptin users were compared with other DPP-4 inhibitor users for assessing the occurrence of cancers, as defined by diagnosis codes. Further analyses focused on specific types of cancer, using either diagnosis codes or a combination of diagnosis and procedure codes. We also carried out various sensitivity analyses, including those with different exposure periods.
Sitagliptin users (149,120 patients, 388,356 person-years) experienced 9,643 cancer incidences (2,483.0/100,000 person-years) versus 12,621 incidences (2,504.4/100,000 person-years) among other DPP-4 inhibitor users (199,860 patients, 503,952 person-years), yielding a minimal difference (incidence rate ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.02). A multiple Cox proportional hazards model showed no significant association between sitagliptin use and overall cancer incidence (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.98-1.04). Findings were also consistent across cancer types and sensitivity analyses.
We observed no evidence to suggest an increased cancer risk among patients prescribed NTTP-contaminated sitagliptin, although continued investigation is needed.
目的/引言:最近美国食品和药物管理局的一份报告强调了对西他列汀中(7-亚硝基-3-(三氟甲基)-5,6,7,8-四氢[1,2,4]三唑并[4,3-a]吡嗪[NTTP])杂质的担忧,促使人们对其安全性进行调查。本研究旨在确定与其他二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂相比,使用受 NTTP 污染的西他列汀是否会增加癌症风险。
这项回顾性队列研究次要使用了日本国民健康保险索赔和特定健康检查数据库,其中包含超过 1.2 亿人的数据。该研究纳入了开始 DPP-4 抑制剂治疗(西他列汀或其他 DPP-4 抑制剂)并连续使用 3 年的患者。通过诊断代码比较西他列汀使用者和其他 DPP-4 抑制剂使用者癌症的发生情况。进一步的分析侧重于特定类型的癌症,使用诊断代码或诊断和程序代码的组合。我们还进行了各种敏感性分析,包括不同的暴露期。
西他列汀使用者(149120 名患者,388356 人年)发生 9643 例癌症(2483.0/100000 人年),而其他 DPP-4 抑制剂使用者(199860 名患者,503952 人年)发生 12621 例(2504.4/100000 人年),差异很小(发病率比 0.99,95%置信区间 0.97-1.02)。多 Cox 比例风险模型显示,西他列汀使用与总体癌症发病率之间无显著关联(风险比 1.01,95%置信区间 0.98-1.04)。癌症类型和敏感性分析的结果也一致。
我们没有观察到服用受 NTTP 污染的西他列汀的患者癌症风险增加的证据,尽管需要进一步研究。