Giannasi Sergio E, Durante Eduardo, Vázquez Fernando R, Kecskes Claudia E, Ladenheim Roberta, Brailovsky Carlos A
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires.
Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2019 Aug 1;117(4):e425-e432. doi: 10.5546/aap.2019.e425.
The evaluation of the clinical teacher's performance provides feedback to motivate them to improve their teaching skills. To perform the cross-cultural adaptation of the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire, the International Guide for the Adaptation of the Questionnaires was followed. The validity of content, response process, construct and reliability were investigated. After cross-cultural adaption, residents of two University hospitals evaluated 187 clinical teachers. Content and answering process were validated. In the confirmatory factor analysis, all indexes and criteria for a good fit suited the 5 factors and 14 items model. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.80. The G coefficient was > 0.70, with low variance of the absolute error. Every clinical teacher should receive at least 6 evaluations to achieve a reliable evaluation of every domain and of their global performance. The Spanish version of the questionnaire is a valid, reliable instrument for medical residents to evaluate teachers.
对临床教师表现的评估提供反馈，以激励他们提高教学技能。为了对马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷进行跨文化改编，遵循了问卷改编国际指南。对内容效度、反应过程、结构效度和信度进行了调查。跨文化改编后，两所大学医院的住院医师对187名临床教师进行了评估。内容和回答过程得到了验证。在验证性因素分析中，所有良好拟合的指标和标准均适用于五因素和十四项模型。克朗巴赫α系数为0.80。G系数>0.70，绝对误差方差较低。每位临床教师应至少接受6次评估，以实现对每个领域及其整体表现的可靠评估。该问卷的西班牙语版本是医学住院医师评估教师的有效、可靠工具。
