• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于认知学徒模型的马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷的心理测量学评估

Psychometric evaluation of Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire based on the cognitive apprenticeship model.

作者信息

Nejadkoorki Hamid, Norouzi Ali, Salajegheh Faranak, Salajegheh Mahla

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Development Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Education Development Center, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jan 22;12:434. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1528_22. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1528_22
PMID:38464664
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10920695/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the quality of clinical teaching. This study was aimed at translation and psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of this questionnaire to evaluate clinical teaching based on the cognitive apprenticeship model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The translation of the questionnaire was performed according to Guillemins framework. Reliability was examined by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Confirmatory factor analysis was studied among 120 medical students. Content validity was assessed by calculating the content validity index and content validity ratio. Face validity was evaluated by conducting interviews with students using concurrent verbal probing and thinking aloud.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the whole scale was 0.95. The content validity index was 0.92, and the content validity ratio was 0.82. Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in a seven-factor model and demonstrated an adequate fit with the data.

CONCLUSION

The Persian version of the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire with seven factors including modeling, coaching, scaffolding, articulation, reflection, exploration, and learning environment appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teaching in Iranian universities of medical sciences.

摘要

背景

马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷是一种用于衡量临床教学质量的有效且可靠的工具。本研究旨在对该问卷的波斯语版本进行翻译和心理测量学评估,以基于认知学徒模型评估临床教学。

材料与方法

问卷的翻译按照吉耶曼框架进行。通过计算克朗巴哈系数来检验信度。对120名医学生进行验证性因素分析。通过计算内容效度指数和内容效度比率来评估内容效度。通过使用同步言语探查和大声思考对学生进行访谈来评估表面效度。

结果

整个量表的克朗巴哈系数为0.95。内容效度指数为0.92,内容效度比率为0.82。验证性因素分析得出一个七因素模型,并表明与数据拟合良好。

结论

包含示范、指导、支架搭建、清晰表达、反思、探索和学习环境这七个因素的马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷波斯语版本似乎是伊朗医学科学大学评估临床教学的有效且可靠的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7a8/10920695/50a41f3609c8/JEHP-12-434-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7a8/10920695/50a41f3609c8/JEHP-12-434-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7a8/10920695/50a41f3609c8/JEHP-12-434-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire based on the cognitive apprenticeship model.基于认知学徒模型的马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷的心理测量学评估
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jan 22;12:434. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1528_22. eCollection 2023.
2
Assessing Preceptor Use of Cognitive Apprenticeship: Is the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) a Useful Approach?评估带教老师对认知学徒制的运用:马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷(MCTQ)是一种有用的方法吗?
Teach Learn Med. 2019 Oct-Dec;31(5):506-518. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1604356. Epub 2019 May 7.
3
Psychometric evaluation of Persian version of medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students.医学生医疗人工智能准备度量表波斯文版的心理计量学评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04516-6.
4
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities by students: A tool for assessing clinical tutors from students' viewpoint.学生对教学质量评估系统波斯语版的心理测量特性:一种从学生视角评估临床导师的工具。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Mar 23;11:92. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1622_20. eCollection 2022.
5
Psychometric Properties Evaluation of Persian Version of the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire.《马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷波斯语版的心理测量学特性评估》
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2023 Sep 8;28(5):581-586. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_324_21. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
6
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Ambulatory Care Learning Educational Environment Measure (ACLEEM) questionnaire, Shiraz, Iran.伊朗设拉子市《门诊护理学习教育环境量表》(ACLEEM)波斯语版本问卷的心理测量学特性
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 Sep 29;7:559-566. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S112861. eCollection 2016.
7
Psychometric analysis of the ambulatory care learning education environment measure (ACLEEM) in Iran.伊朗门诊护理学习教育环境量表(ACLEEM)的心理测量分析
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Nov 21;29:299. eCollection 2015.
8
Assessing validity and reliability of Dundee ready educational environment measure (DREEM) in Iran.评估邓迪良好教育环境量表(DREEM)在伊朗的有效性和可靠性。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014 Jul 14;28:60. eCollection 2014.
9
Evaluation of psychometric properties of the maastricht upper extremity questionnaire (MUEQ) in iranian computer users.伊朗计算机用户中马斯特里赫特上肢问卷(MUEQ)心理测量学特性的评估
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jul 30;10:245. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1096_20. eCollection 2021.
10
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of bedside teaching (BST) Instrument.波斯语版床边教学(BST)工具的心理测量特性。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2021 Jan;9(1):44-49. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2020.88501.1343.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the role of clinical exposure on motivational self-regulation skills in medical students based on cognitive apprenticeship model.基于认知学徒制模式研究临床暴露对医学生动机自我调节技能的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05253-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical teaching practices of nurse educators: An integrative literature review.护士教育工作者的临床教学实践:一项综合文献综述。
Health SA. 2022 Sep 30;27:1728. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1728. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluating Clinical Educators' Competence in an East Asian Context: Who Values What?评估东亚背景下临床教育工作者的能力:谁重视什么?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 28;9:896822. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.896822. eCollection 2022.
3
Regression analyses of questionnaires in bedside teaching.床边教学中问卷的回归分析
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 16;20(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02295-y.
4
Piloting a first-year resident-as-teacher workshop to foster evidence-based teaching.开展一年级住院医师教师培训工作坊,以促进循证教学。
J Dent Educ. 2021 Jan;85(1):16-22. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12396. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
5
Using the cognitive apprenticeship model to identify learning strategies that learners view as effective in ward rounds.运用认知学徒制模型来识别学习者认为在查房中有效的学习策略。
Postgrad Med J. 2021 Jan;97(1143):5-9. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137519. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
6
Measuring and assessing the competencies of preceptors in health professions: a systematic scoping review.测量和评估健康职业导师的能力:系统范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 24;20(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02082-9.
7
Medical Education Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间的医学教育。
Indian Pediatr. 2020 Jul 15;57(7):652-657. doi: 10.1007/s13312-020-1894-7. Epub 2020 May 14.
8
Barriers to outpatient education for medical students: a narrative review.医学生门诊教育的障碍:一项叙述性综述。
Int J Med Educ. 2019 Sep 27;10:180-190. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5d76.32c5.
9
[Transcultural validation of the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire].《马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷调查表的跨文化验证》
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2019 Aug 1;117(4):e425-e432. doi: 10.5546/aap.2019.e425.
10
Assessing Preceptor Use of Cognitive Apprenticeship: Is the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) a Useful Approach?评估带教老师对认知学徒制的运用:马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷(MCTQ)是一种有用的方法吗?
Teach Learn Med. 2019 Oct-Dec;31(5):506-518. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1604356. Epub 2019 May 7.