• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动边缘计算的最优卸载决策策略及其影响分析

Optimal Offloading Decision Strategies and Their Influence Analysis of Mobile Edge Computing.

作者信息

Xu Jiuyun, Hao Zhuangyuan, Sun Xiaoting

机构信息

College of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 23;19(14):3231. doi: 10.3390/s19143231.

DOI:10.3390/s19143231
PMID:31340460
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6679515/
Abstract

Mobile edge computing (MEC) has become more popular both in academia and industry. Currently, with the help of edge servers and cloud servers, it is one of the substantial technologies to overcome the latency between cloud server and wireless device, computation capability and storage shortage of wireless devices. In mobile edge computing, wireless devices take responsibility with input data. At the same time, edge servers and cloud servers take charge of computation and storage. However, until now, how to balance the power consumption of edge devices and time delay has not been well addressed in mobile edge computing. In this paper, we focus on strategies of the task offloading decision and the influence analysis of offloading decisions on different environments. Firstly, we propose a system model considering both energy consumption and time delay and formulate it into an optimization problem. Then, we employ two algorithms-Enumerating and Branch-and-Bound-to get the optimal or near-optimal decision for minimizing the system cost including the time delay and energy consumption. Furthermore, we compare the performance between two algorithms and draw the conclusion that the comprehensive performance of Branch-and-Bound algorithm is better than that of the other. Finally, we analyse the influence factors of optimal offloading decisions and the minimum cost in detail by changing key parameters.

摘要

移动边缘计算(MEC)在学术界和工业界都越来越受欢迎。目前,借助边缘服务器和云服务器,它是克服云服务器与无线设备之间延迟、无线设备计算能力和存储不足的重要技术之一。在移动边缘计算中,无线设备负责输入数据。同时,边缘服务器和云服务器负责计算和存储。然而,到目前为止,如何平衡边缘设备的功耗和时延在移动边缘计算中尚未得到很好的解决。在本文中,我们关注任务卸载决策策略以及卸载决策对不同环境的影响分析。首先,我们提出一个同时考虑能耗和时延的系统模型,并将其转化为一个优化问题。然后,我们采用两种算法——枚举法和分支定界法——来获得使包括时延和能耗在内的系统成本最小化的最优或近似最优决策。此外,我们比较了两种算法的性能,并得出分支定界算法的综合性能优于另一种算法的结论。最后,我们通过改变关键参数详细分析了最优卸载决策和最小成本的影响因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/3b429c33d9de/sensors-19-03231-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/3033f7431b55/sensors-19-03231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/d2f6b5ca9f47/sensors-19-03231-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/b331b1336748/sensors-19-03231-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/b63e15c66974/sensors-19-03231-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/331677a1c32b/sensors-19-03231-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/ef9dfa77b540/sensors-19-03231-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/3b429c33d9de/sensors-19-03231-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/3033f7431b55/sensors-19-03231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/d2f6b5ca9f47/sensors-19-03231-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/b331b1336748/sensors-19-03231-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/b63e15c66974/sensors-19-03231-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/331677a1c32b/sensors-19-03231-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/ef9dfa77b540/sensors-19-03231-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78da/6679515/3b429c33d9de/sensors-19-03231-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal Offloading Decision Strategies and Their Influence Analysis of Mobile Edge Computing.移动边缘计算的最优卸载决策策略及其影响分析
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 23;19(14):3231. doi: 10.3390/s19143231.
2
Multi-Server Multi-User Multi-Task Computation Offloading for Mobile Edge Computing Networks.移动边缘计算网络中的多服务器多用户多任务计算卸载。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Mar 24;19(6):1446. doi: 10.3390/s19061446.
3
Fuzzy Decision-Based Efficient Task Offloading Management Scheme in Multi-Tier MEC-Enabled Networks.基于模糊决策的多层边缘计算网络高效任务卸载管理方案
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 20;21(4):1484. doi: 10.3390/s21041484.
4
An Efficient Dynamic-Decision Based Task Scheduler for Task Offloading Optimization and Energy Management in Mobile Cloud Computing.一种用于移动云计算中任务卸载优化和能量管理的高效基于动态决策的任务调度器。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 1;21(13):4527. doi: 10.3390/s21134527.
5
Energy-Aware Computation Offloading of IoT Sensors in Cloudlet-Based Mobile Edge Computing.基于云边计算的物联网传感器的能量感知计算卸载。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jun 15;18(6):1945. doi: 10.3390/s18061945.
6
Energy-Optimal Latency-Constrained Application Offloading in Mobile-Edge Computing.移动边缘计算中的能量最优、延迟受限的应用程序卸载。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 28;20(11):3064. doi: 10.3390/s20113064.
7
Risk-Aware Distributionally Robust Optimization for Mobile Edge Computation Task Offloading in the Space-Air-Ground Integrated Network.面向天地空一体化网络中移动边缘计算任务卸载的风险感知分布鲁棒优化。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 20;23(12):5729. doi: 10.3390/s23125729.
8
HAGP: A Heuristic Algorithm Based on Greedy Policy for Task Offloading with Reliability of MDs in MEC of the Industrial Internet.基于贪心策略的启发式算法用于工业互联网中移动边缘计算的 MDs 可靠性的任务卸载。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 18;21(10):3513. doi: 10.3390/s21103513.
9
Deep Reinforcement Learning for Computation Offloading and Resource Allocation in Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicle Assisted Edge Computing.无人机辅助边缘计算中用于计算卸载和资源分配的深度强化学习
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 29;21(19):6499. doi: 10.3390/s21196499.
10
Efficient Multiuser Computation for Mobile-Edge Computing in IoT Application Using Optimization Algorithm.使用优化算法的物联网应用中移动边缘计算的高效多用户计算
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2021 Nov 10;2021:9014559. doi: 10.1155/2021/9014559. eCollection 2021.