Section of Surgical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, 20 Park Street, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
Department of Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Jul 24;7(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0672-3.
Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma, but most patients treated with CPI eventually develop progressive disease. Local therapy including surgery, ablation or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be useful to manage limited progression, but criteria for patient selection have not been established. Previous work has suggested progression-free survival (PFS) after local therapy is associated with patterns of immunotherapy failure, but this has not been studied in patients treated with CPI.
We analyzed clinical data from patients with metastatic melanoma who were treated with antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1 or PD-L1, either as single-agent or combination therapy, and identified those who had disease progression in 1 to 3 sites managed with local therapy. Patterns of CPI failure were designated by independent radiological review as growth of established metastases or appearance of new metastases. Local therapy for diagnosis, palliation or CNS metastases was excluded.
Four hundred twenty-eight patients with metastatic melanoma received treatment with CPI from 2007 to 2018. Seventy-seven have ongoing complete responses while 69 died within 6 months of starting CPI; of the remaining 282 patients, 52 (18%) were treated with local therapy meeting our inclusion criteria. Local therapy to achieve no evidence of disease (NED) was associated with three-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 31% and five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of 60%. Stratified by patterns of failure, patients with progression in established tumors had three-year PFS of 70%, while those with new metastases had three-year PFS of 6% (P = 0.001). Five-year DSS after local therapy was 93% versus 31%, respectively (P = 0.046).
Local therapy for oligoprogression after CPI can result in durable PFS in selected patients. We observed that patterns of failure seen during or after CPI treatment are strongly associated with PFS after local therapy, and may represent a useful criterion for patient selection. This experience suggests there may be an increased role for local therapy in patients being treated with immunotherapy.
检查点抑制剂(CPI)彻底改变了转移性黑色素瘤的治疗方法,但大多数接受 CPI 治疗的患者最终都会出现疾病进展。局部治疗,包括手术、消融或立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT),可能对管理局限性进展有用,但患者选择的标准尚未确定。先前的工作表明,局部治疗后无进展生存期(PFS)与免疫治疗失败模式相关,但尚未在接受 CPI 治疗的患者中进行研究。
我们分析了接受 CTLA-4、PD-1 或 PD-L1 单药或联合治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者的临床数据,并确定了 1 至 3 个部位疾病进展后接受局部治疗的患者。CPI 失败模式由独立影像学评估指定为已建立转移灶的生长或新转移灶的出现。排除用于诊断、姑息治疗或中枢神经系统转移的局部治疗。
从 2007 年到 2018 年,428 名转移性黑色素瘤患者接受了 CPI 治疗。77 名患者仍处于持续完全缓解状态,69 名患者在开始 CPI 后 6 个月内死亡;在其余 282 名患者中,52 名(18%)接受了符合我们纳入标准的局部治疗。达到无疾病证据(NED)的局部治疗与 3 年无进展生存率(PFS)为 31%和 5 年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)为 60%相关。按失败模式分层,在已建立的肿瘤中进展的患者 3 年 PFS 为 70%,而出现新转移灶的患者 3 年 PFS 为 6%(P=0.001)。局部治疗后 5 年 DSS 分别为 93%和 31%(P=0.046)。
CPI 后寡进展的局部治疗可使部分患者获得持久的 PFS。我们观察到,CPI 治疗期间或之后观察到的失败模式与局部治疗后的 PFS 密切相关,这可能是患者选择的一个有用标准。这一经验表明,在接受免疫治疗的患者中,局部治疗的作用可能会增加。