D'Angelo Sandra P, Larkin James, Sosman Jeffrey A, Lebbé Celeste, Brady Benjamin, Neyns Bart, Schmidt Henrik, Hassel Jessica C, Hodi F Stephen, Lorigan Paul, Savage Kerry J, Miller Wilson H, Mohr Peter, Marquez-Rodas Ivan, Charles Julie, Kaatz Martin, Sznol Mario, Weber Jeffrey S, Shoushtari Alexander N, Ruisi Mary, Jiang Joel, Wolchok Jedd D
Sandra P. D'Angelo, Alexander N. Shoushtari, and Jedd D. Wolchok, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; James Larkin, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Paul Lorigan, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Celeste Lebbé, Saint-Louis Hospital, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U976, Université Paris Diderot, Paris; Julie Charles, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble Alps University, Grenoble, France; Benjamin Brady, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia; Bart Neyns, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Henrik Schmidt, Århus University, Åarhus, Denmark; Jessica C. Hassel, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg; Peter Mohr, Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude; Martin Kaatz, SRH Waldklinikum Gera, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Kerry J. Savage, BC Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Wilson H. Miller Jr, Lady Davis Institute and Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Ivan Marquez-Rodas, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain; Mario Sznol, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; Jeffrey S. Weber, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; and Mary Ruisi and Joel Jiang, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):226-235. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.9258. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
Purpose Mucosal melanoma is an aggressive malignancy with a poor response to conventional therapies. The efficacy and safety of nivolumab (a programmed death-1 checkpoint inhibitor), alone or combined with ipilimumab (a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 checkpoint inhibitor), have not been reported in this rare melanoma subtype. Patients and Methods Data were pooled from 889 patients who received nivolumab monotherapy in clinical studies, including phase III trials; 86 (10%) had mucosal melanoma and 665 (75%) had cutaneous melanoma. Data were also pooled for patients who received nivolumab combined with ipilimumab (n = 35, mucosal melanoma; n = 326, cutaneous melanoma). Results Among patients who received nivolumab monotherapy, median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 5.4 months) and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.5 months) for mucosal and cutaneous melanoma, with objective response rates of 23.3% (95% CI, 14.8% to 33.6%) and 40.9% (95% CI, 37.1% to 44.7%), respectively. Median progression-free survival in patients treated with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab was 5.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 months to not reached) and 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.9 to 16.7 months) for mucosal and cutaneous melanoma, with objective response rates of 37.1% (95% CI, 21.5% to 55.1%) and 60.4% (95% CI, 54.9% to 65.8%), respectively. For mucosal and cutaneous melanoma, respectively, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 8.1% and 12.5% for nivolumab monotherapy and 40.0% and 54.9% for combination therapy. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the largest analysis of data for anti-programmed death-1 therapy in mucosal melanoma to date. Nivolumab combined with ipilimumab seemed to have greater efficacy than either agent alone, and although the activity was lower in mucosal melanoma, the safety profile was similar between subtypes.
目的 黏膜黑色素瘤是一种侵袭性恶性肿瘤,对传统疗法反应不佳。纳武单抗(一种程序性死亡-1检查点抑制剂)单独使用或与伊匹单抗(一种细胞毒性T淋巴细胞抗原-4检查点抑制剂)联合使用在这种罕见的黑色素瘤亚型中的疗效和安全性尚未见报道。
患者与方法 数据来自889例在临床研究(包括III期试验)中接受纳武单抗单药治疗的患者;其中86例(10%)患有黏膜黑色素瘤,665例(75%)患有皮肤黑色素瘤。还汇总了接受纳武单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗患者的数据(黏膜黑色素瘤患者35例;皮肤黑色素瘤患者326例)。
结果 在接受纳武单抗单药治疗的患者中,黏膜黑色素瘤和皮肤黑色素瘤的中位无进展生存期分别为3.0个月(95%CI,2.2至5.4个月)和6.2个月(95%CI,5.1至7.5个月),客观缓解率分别为23.3%(95%CI,14.8%至33.6%)和40.9%(95%CI,37.1%至44.7%)。接受纳武单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗的黏膜黑色素瘤和皮肤黑色素瘤患者的中位无进展生存期分别为5.9个月(95%CI,2.8个月至未达到)和11.7个月(95%CI,8.9至16.7个月),客观缓解率分别为37.1%(95%CI,21.5%至55.1%)和60.4%(95%CI,54.9%至65.8%)。对于黏膜黑色素瘤和皮肤黑色素瘤,纳武单抗单药治疗的3级或4级治疗相关不良事件发生率分别为8.1%和12.5%,联合治疗的发生率分别为40.0%和54.9%。
结论 据我们所知,这是迄今为止对黏膜黑色素瘤抗程序性死亡-1治疗数据的最大规模分析。纳武单抗联合伊匹单抗似乎比单独使用任何一种药物都更有效,尽管在黏膜黑色素瘤中的活性较低,但各亚型之间的安全性相似。