Suppr超能文献

验证小儿生理与解剖分诊评分在受伤小儿患者中的应用。

Validation of the Pediatric Physiological and Anatomical Triage Score in Injured Pediatric Patients.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine,Yokohama,Japan.

出版信息

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Aug;34(4):363-369. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004552. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Triaging plays an important role in providing suitable care to a large number of casualties in a disaster setting. A Pediatric Physiological and Anatomical Triage Score (PPATS) was developed as a new secondary triage method. This study aimed to validate the accuracy of the PPATS in identifying injured pediatric patients who are admitted at a high frequency and require immediate treatment in a disaster setting. The PPATS method was also compared with the current triage methods, such as the Triage Revised Trauma Score (TRTS).

METHODS

A retrospective review of pediatric patients aged ≤15 years, registered in the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) from 2012 through 2016, was conducted and PPATS was performed. The PPATS method graded patients from zero to 22, and was calculated based on vital signs, anatomical abnormalities, and the need for life-saving interventions. It categorized patients based on their priority, and the intensive care unit (ICU)-indicated patients were assigned a PPATS ≥six. The accuracy of PPATS and TRTS in predicting the outcome of ICU-indicated patients was compared.

RESULTS

Of 2,005 pediatric patients, 1,002 (50%) were admitted to the ICU. The median age of the patients was nine years (interquartile range [IQR]: 6-13 years). The sensitivity and specificity of PPATS were 78.6% and 43.7%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was larger for PPATS (0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.63) than for TRTS (0.57; 95% CI, 0.56-0.59; P <.01). Regression analysis showed a significant correlation between PPATS and the Injury Severity Score (ISS; r2 = 0.353; P <.001), predicted survival rate (r2 = 0.396; P <.001), and duration of hospital stay (r2 = 0.252; P <.001).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of PPATS for injured pediatric patients was superior to that of current secondary triage methods. The PPATS method is useful not only for identifying high-priority patients, but also for determining the priority ranking for medical treatments and evacuation.

摘要

简介

分诊在为灾害环境中的大量伤员提供适当的医疗服务方面发挥着重要作用。儿科生理与解剖分诊评分(PPATS)作为一种新的二级分诊方法被开发出来。本研究旨在验证 PPATS 在识别在灾害环境中高频次需要立即治疗的受伤儿科患者中的准确性。PPATS 方法还与目前的分诊方法,如修订创伤评分(TRTS)进行了比较。

方法

回顾性分析了 2012 年至 2016 年期间登记在日本创伤数据库(JTDB)的年龄≤15 岁的儿科患者,并进行了 PPATS 评分。PPATS 评分根据生命体征、解剖异常和需要挽救生命的干预措施,将患者从 0 分到 22 分进行评分。它根据患者的优先级对患者进行分类,将需要 ICU 治疗的患者分配为 PPATS≥6 分。比较了 PPATS 和 TRTS 在预测 ICU 指示患者结局方面的准确性。

结果

在 2005 名儿科患者中,有 1002 名(50%)被收入 ICU。患者的中位年龄为 9 岁(四分位距 [IQR]:6-13 岁)。PPATS 的敏感性和特异性分别为 78.6%和 43.7%。PPATS 的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)大于 TRTS(0.61;95%置信区间 [CI],0.59-0.63)(P <.01)。回归分析显示,PPATS 与损伤严重度评分(ISS;r2 = 0.353;P <.001)、预测生存率(r2 = 0.396;P <.001)和住院时间(r2 = 0.252;P <.001)之间存在显著相关性。

结论

PPATS 对受伤儿科患者的准确性优于目前的二级分诊方法。PPATS 方法不仅可用于识别高优先级患者,还可用于确定医疗和疏散的优先级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验