• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般实践中的“永不发生”事件:探索英国和苏格兰全科医生对“永不发生”事件看法的焦点小组研究。

Never events in general practice: a focus group study exploring the views of English and Scottish general practitioners of 'never events'.

机构信息

Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 23;9(7):e028927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028927.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028927
PMID:31340968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6661597/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine general practitioner (GP) understanding of the never event (NE) concept in general practice, and to identify potential enablers and barriers to implementation in UK general practice.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using focus groups. The data were analysed thematically and were informed by the normalisation process theory.

SETTING

General practice in Northwest England and Southwest Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

25 GPs took part in five focus groups. 13 GPs were female and 12 male with an age range of 28-60.

RESULTS

The NE approach of avoiding serious preventable adverse outcomes from healthcare fitted with participants expectations of the delivery of care but the implementation of strategies to prevent the specific NE was considered complex and variable. The main themes identified participants' understandings and perceived limitations of the NE concept; the embedded layers of responsibility to implement NE within practices and the work required for implementation within general practices. Participants' accounts highlighted the differential nature of work in general practice and that the implementation of initiatives to address specific NE should be situated within a learning and systems approach to implementation. Some NEs were considered more relevant and amenable to simple solutions than others which could influence implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The NE concept was considered overall an important approach to help address key primary care patient safety issues. The utility of individual NEs may vary depending on the complexity of the initiatives that would be needed to manage related risks to as low as reasonably practicable.

摘要

目的

调查全科医生(GP)对一般实践中“永远事件”(NE)概念的理解,并确定在英国普通实践中实施的潜在促成因素和障碍。

设计

使用焦点小组的定性研究。数据通过主题分析进行分析,并受规范化进程理论的启发。

地点

英格兰西北部和苏格兰西南部的普通实践。

参与者

25 名全科医生参加了五个焦点小组。其中 13 名全科医生为女性,12 名男性,年龄在 28-60 岁之间。

结果

避免医疗保健中严重可预防不良后果的 NE 方法符合参与者对护理提供的期望,但实施预防特定 NE 的策略被认为是复杂且可变的。确定的主要主题包括参与者对 NE 概念的理解和感知限制;在实践中实施 NE 的隐含责任层次结构以及在普通实践中实施所需的工作。参与者的描述突出了普通实践中工作的差异性,并且应该将解决特定 NE 的举措的实施置于学习和系统实施方法中。一些 NE 被认为比其他 NE 更相关且更容易采用简单的解决方案,这可能会影响实施。

结论

总体而言,NE 概念被认为是帮助解决关键初级保健患者安全问题的重要方法。个别 NE 的实用性可能因需要管理相关风险的举措的复杂性而异,以尽可能合理地降低风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c0b/6661597/6f7c8c323dbc/bmjopen-2019-028927f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c0b/6661597/6f7c8c323dbc/bmjopen-2019-028927f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c0b/6661597/6f7c8c323dbc/bmjopen-2019-028927f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Never events in general practice: a focus group study exploring the views of English and Scottish general practitioners of 'never events'.一般实践中的“永不发生”事件:探索英国和苏格兰全科医生对“永不发生”事件看法的焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 23;9(7):e028927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028927.
2
Never Events in UK General Practice: A Survey of the Views of General Practitioners on Their Frequency and Acceptability as a Safety Improvement Approach.英国全科医疗中的“Never Events”:全科医生对其发生频率及作为安全改进方法的可接受性的看法调查。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Dec;15(4):334-342. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000380.
3
Facilitators and barriers to safer care in Scottish general practice: a qualitative study of the implementation of the trigger review method using normalisation process theory.促进和阻碍苏格兰全科医疗中更安全护理的因素:使用常规过程理论对触发式审查方法实施的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 18;9(9):e029914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029914.
4
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
5
Qualitative evaluation of the Safety and Improvement in Primary Care (SIPC) pilot collaborative in Scotland: perceptions and experiences of participating care teams.苏格兰基层医疗安全与改善(SIPC)试点合作项目的定性评估:参与护理团队的看法与经验
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e009526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009526.
6
The causes of prescribing errors in English general practices: a qualitative study.英国普通医疗实践中处方错误的原因:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Oct;63(615):e713-20. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X673739.
7
General practitioners' views on perceived and actual gains, benefits and barriers associated with the implementation of an Australian health assessment for people with intellectual disability.全科医生对实施澳大利亚智障人士健康评估的感知和实际收益、益处及障碍的看法。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Oct;57(10):913-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01586.x. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
8
Perceived safety climate in Irish primary care settings-a comparison with Scotland and England.爱尔兰初级保健环境中的感知安全氛围——与苏格兰和英格兰的比较。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Jan 1;24(1):252-257. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2018.1524002.
9
Healthcare practitioners' experiences of an intervention to detect and treat patients with liver disease (the LOCATE intervention): a qualitative process evaluation.医疗保健从业者对一项旨在检测和治疗肝病患者的干预措施(LOCATE 干预)的体验:一项定性过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 22;9(5):e028591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028591.
10
Understanding the implementation of 'sick day guidance' to prevent acute kidney injury across a primary care setting in England: a qualitative evaluation.理解在英格兰的初级保健环境中实施“病假指导”以预防急性肾损伤的情况:一项定性评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(11):e017241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017241.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.确定一组医疗保健“永不发生”事件,以推动系统变革:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jun;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002264.

本文引用的文献

1
Managing diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: a systematic critical review.基层医疗中诊断不确定性的管理:系统批判性评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Aug 7;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0650-0.
2
Never Events in UK General Practice: A Survey of the Views of General Practitioners on Their Frequency and Acceptability as a Safety Improvement Approach.英国全科医疗中的“Never Events”:全科医生对其发生频率及作为安全改进方法的可接受性的看法调查。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Dec;15(4):334-342. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000380.
3
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Significant Event Analysis: Exploring Personal Impact and Applying Systems Thinking in Primary Care.
提高重大事件分析的有效性:探索个人影响并将系统思维应用于初级保健。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016 Summer;36(3):195-205. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000098.
4
Learning from doing: the case for combining normalisation process theory and participatory learning and action research methodology for primary healthcare implementation research.在实践中学习:将规范化过程理论与参与式学习及行动研究方法相结合用于初级卫生保健实施研究的案例
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 3;16(a):346. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1587-z.
5
Preventing Acute Kidney Injury: a qualitative study exploring 'sick day rules' implementation in primary care.预防急性肾损伤:一项探索基层医疗中“患病日规则”实施情况的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 22;17:91. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0480-5.
6
How safe is primary care? A systematic review.初级保健有多安全?一项系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):544-53. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004178. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
7
MAXimising Involvement in MUltiMorbidity (MAXIMUM) in primary care: protocol for an observation and interview study of patients, GPs and other care providers to identify ways of reducing patient safety failures.初级保健中多重疾病的最大参与度(MAXIMUM):一项针对患者、全科医生及其他护理人员的观察与访谈研究方案,旨在确定减少患者安全失误的方法。
BMJ Open. 2014 Aug 18;4(8):e005493. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005493.
8
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.报告定性研究的标准:建议的综合。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
9
Developing a preliminary 'never event' list for general practice using consensus-building methods.运用共识构建方法为全科医疗制定初步的“重大不良事件”清单。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Mar;64(620):e159-67. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677536.
10
A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes.运用规范化进程理论研究实施过程的定性系统评价研究。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 2;9:2. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-2.