• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developing a preliminary 'never event' list for general practice using consensus-building methods.运用共识构建方法为全科医疗制定初步的“重大不良事件”清单。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Mar;64(620):e159-67. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677536.
2
Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices.提升医疗保健安全性:对患者安全实践的批判性分析。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001(43):i-x, 1-668.
3
Patient safety in dentistry: development of a candidate 'never event' list for primary care.牙科领域的患者安全:制定一份适用于初级保健的候选“零事故”清单。
Br Dent J. 2017 May 26;222(10):782-788. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.456.
4
Is the 'never event' concept a useful safety management strategy in complex primary healthcare systems?“不该发生的事件”概念在复杂的初级医疗保健系统中是否是一种有用的安全管理策略?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jan 12;33(Supplement_1):25-30. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa101.
5
Participatory design of a preliminary safety checklist for general practice.全科医疗初步安全检查表的参与式设计
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 May;65(634):e330-43. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X684865.
6
International recommendations for national patient safety incident reporting systems: an expert Delphi consensus-building process.国家患者安全事件报告系统的国际建议:专家德尔菲共识达成过程
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Feb;26(2):150-163. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004456. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Never events in general practice: a focus group study exploring the views of English and Scottish general practitioners of 'never events'.一般实践中的“永不发生”事件:探索英国和苏格兰全科医生对“永不发生”事件看法的焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 23;9(7):e028927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028927.
9
Assessing patient safety culture in New Zealand primary care: a pilot study using a modified Manchester Patient Safety Framework in Dunedin general practices.评估新西兰初级保健中的患者安全文化:一项在达尼丁全科诊所使用改良版曼彻斯特患者安全框架的试点研究。
J Prim Health Care. 2011 Mar 1;3(1):35-40.
10
Quality improvement and person-centredness: a participatory mixed methods study to develop the 'always event' concept for primary care.质量改进与以患者为中心:一项参与式混合方法研究,旨在为初级医疗保健开发“始终事件”概念。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 28;5(4):e006667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006667.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding patient safety in dentistry: evaluating the present and envisioning the future-a narrative review.理解牙科中的患者安全:评估现状并展望未来——叙述性综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 7;13(Suppl 2):e002502. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002502.
2
Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.确定一组医疗保健“永不发生”事件,以推动系统变革:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jun;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002264.
3
Defining healthcare never events to effect system change: A protocol for systematic review.定义医疗“永不事件”以推动系统变革:系统评价方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0279113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279113. eCollection 2022.
4
Never events in general practice: a focus group study exploring the views of English and Scottish general practitioners of 'never events'.一般实践中的“永不发生”事件:探索英国和苏格兰全科医生对“永不发生”事件看法的焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 23;9(7):e028927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028927.
5
Content analysis of 50 clinical negligence claims involving test results management systems in general practice.对50起涉及全科医疗中检测结果管理系统的临床过失索赔案的内容分析。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Nov 22;7(4):e000463. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000463. eCollection 2018.
6
'The big buzz': a qualitative study of how safe care is perceived, understood and improved in general practice.“热门话题”:关于在全科医疗中安全护理如何被感知、理解和改善的定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 9;19(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0772-z.
7
Dentists are humans too - education in human factors within dental care.牙医也是人——牙科护理中的人为因素教育。
Br Dent J. 2018 Jun 8;224(11):901-904. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.438.
8
Developing agreement on never events in primary care dentistry: an international eDelphi study.就基层牙科医疗中的严重可避免事件达成共识:一项国际电子德尔菲研究。
Br Dent J. 2018 May 11;224(9):733-740. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.351.
9
Patient safety in dentistry: development of a candidate 'never event' list for primary care.牙科领域的患者安全:制定一份适用于初级保健的候选“零事故”清单。
Br Dent J. 2017 May 26;222(10):782-788. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.456.
10
Never Events in UK General Practice: A Survey of the Views of General Practitioners on Their Frequency and Acceptability as a Safety Improvement Approach.英国全科医疗中的“Never Events”:全科医生对其发生频率及作为安全改进方法的可接受性的看法调查。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Dec;15(4):334-342. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000380.

本文引用的文献

1
Can we quantify harm in general practice records? An assessment of precision and power using computer simulation.能否在全科医疗记录中量化伤害?使用计算机模拟评估精度和效能。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 13;13:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-39.
2
Predictors of never events in patients undergoing radical dissection of cervical lymph nodes.预测行根治性颈淋巴结清扫术患者的无事件生存。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Jun;115(6):710-6. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
3
Procedures and training review aims to bring an end to 'never event'.程序与培训审查旨在杜绝“绝不允许发生的事件”。
Nurs Stand. 2012;26(52):12-3. doi: 10.7748/ns2012.08.26.52.12.p9212.
4
Intraocular lens confusions: a preventable "never event" - The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital protocol.人工晶状体混淆:可预防的“无过错事件”- 皇家维多利亚眼耳医院方案。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;57(5):430-47. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2011.12.003.
5
Endophthalmitis is not a "never event".眼内炎并非“零失误事件”。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Aug;119(8):1507-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.048.
6
Systems-based safety intervention: reducing falls with injury and total falls on an orthopaedic ward.基于系统的安全干预:减少骨科病房带伤跌倒和总跌倒。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 3;94(13):1217-22. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01647.
7
The battle of words and the reality of never events in breast reconstruction: incidence, risk factors predictive of occurrence, and economic cost analysis.在乳房重建中文字游戏与无差错事件的现实:发生率、发生的预测因素及经济成本分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jul;130(1):23-29. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182547b74.
8
Errors in administrative-reported ventilator-associated pneumonia rates: are never events really so?行政报告的呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率中的错误:“绝不允许发生的事件”真的如此吗?
Am Surg. 2011 Aug;77(8):998-1002.
9
Policy update: never events.政策更新:严重可避免事件
Nurs Times. 2011;107(23):12-3.
10
Pediatric tracheotomy wound complications: incidence and significance.小儿气管切开伤口并发症:发生率及意义
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Apr;137(4):363-6. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.33.

运用共识构建方法为全科医疗制定初步的“重大不良事件”清单。

Developing a preliminary 'never event' list for general practice using consensus-building methods.

作者信息

de Wet Carl, O'Donnell Catherine, Bowie Paul

机构信息

General Practice & Primary Care, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Mar;64(620):e159-67. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677536.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp14X677536
PMID:24567655
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3933834/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 'never event' concept has been implemented in many acute hospital settings to help prevent serious patient safety incidents. Benefits include increasing awareness of highly important patient safety risks among the healthcare workforce, promoting proactive implementation of preventive measures, and facilitating incident reporting.

AIM

To develop a preliminary list of never events for general practice.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Application of a range of consensus-building methods in Scottish and UK general practices.

METHOD

A total of 345 general practice team members suggested potential never events. Next, 'informed' staff (n =15) developed criteria for defining never events and applied the criteria to create a list of candidate never events. Finally, UK primary care patient safety 'experts' (n = 17) reviewed, refined, and validated a preliminary list via a modified Delphi group and by completing a content validity index exercise.

RESULTS

There were 721 written suggestions received as potential never events. Thematic categorisation reduced this to 38. Five criteria specific to general practice were developed and applied to produce 11 candidate never events. The expert group endorsed a preliminary list of 10 items with a content validity index (CVI) score of >80%.

CONCLUSION

A preliminary list of never events was developed for general practice through practitioner experience and consensus-building methods. This is an important first step to determine the potential value of the never event concept in this setting. It is now intended to undertake further testing of this preliminary list to assess its acceptability, feasibility, and potential usefulness as a safety improvement intervention.

摘要

背景

“零容忍事件”概念已在许多急症医院环境中实施,以帮助预防严重的患者安全事故。其益处包括提高医疗保健人员对极其重要的患者安全风险的认识、促进预防措施的积极实施以及便于事件报告。

目的

制定一份全科医疗的零容忍事件初步清单。

设计与背景

在苏格兰和英国的全科医疗中应用一系列达成共识的方法。

方法

共有345名全科医疗团队成员提出了潜在的零容忍事件。接下来,“见多识广的”工作人员(n = 15)制定了定义零容忍事件的标准,并应用这些标准创建了一份候选零容忍事件清单。最后,英国初级保健患者安全“专家”(n = 17)通过改进的德尔菲小组并完成内容效度指数练习,对一份初步清单进行了审查、完善和验证。

结果

共收到721条作为潜在零容忍事件的书面建议。主题分类后减少到38条。制定并应用了五条全科医疗特有的标准,以产生11条候选零容忍事件。专家组认可了一份包含10项内容的初步清单,其内容效度指数(CVI)得分>80%。

结论

通过从业者经验和达成共识的方法,为全科医疗制定了一份零容忍事件初步清单。这是确定零容忍事件概念在该环境中的潜在价值的重要第一步。现在打算对这份初步清单进行进一步测试,以评估其可接受性、可行性以及作为安全改进干预措施的潜在效用。