HSR&D Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 23;9(7):e030696. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030696.
Care transition for patients being discharged from inpatient mental healthcare to outpatient settings is a growing focus for healthcare delivery systems. Many studies of this inpatient to outpatient transition use the rate of postdischarge readmissions as a patient-level outcome measure to assess the quality of transition. However, it is unclear how studies define the measure, and whether there is a shared understanding by the field regarding which definition is appropriate for which circumstances. This scoping review thus aims to examine how published studies have approached measuring unnecessary psychiatric readmissions.
The scoping review will be structured according to Levac 's enhancement to Arksey and O'Malley's framework for conducting scoping reviews. The protocol is registered through the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/5nxuc/). We will search literature databases for studies that (1) are about care transition processes associated with unnecessary psychiatric readmissions and (2) specify use of at least one readmission time interval (ie, time period since previous discharge from inpatient care, within which a hospitalisation can be considered a readmission). Screening and review of articles will be carried out by two reviewers, first independently then involving a third reviewer as needed for consensus. We will assess review findings through both tabular and thematic analyses, noting prevalent trends in study characteristics and emergent themes across our reviewed studies.
This work comes at a time of heightened interest by many mental healthcare systems in high-quality practices that structure their care processes towards effective inpatient to outpatient transitions. Findings will support the systems' careful examination of alternative potential transitional interventions, helping to ensure that their often limited quality enhancement resources are put to optimal use. We will focus on disseminating our findings to the healthcare community through strong communication infrastructures and connections with health system stakeholders that our multidisciplinary study consultants will foster throughout this study.
从住院精神卫生保健向门诊环境过渡是医疗服务系统日益关注的焦点。许多关于这种从住院到门诊过渡的研究都使用出院后再入院率作为衡量患者过渡质量的指标。然而,目前尚不清楚这些研究如何定义这一指标,以及该领域是否对哪种定义适用于哪种情况有共同的理解。因此,这项范围界定综述旨在检查已发表的研究在衡量不必要的精神科再入院方面的方法。
该范围界定综述将根据 Levac 对 Arksey 和 O'Malley 进行范围界定综述框架的扩展进行构建。该方案已在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/5nxuc/)上注册。我们将在文献数据库中搜索与不必要的精神科再入院相关的护理过渡过程的研究(1),并(2)指定使用至少一个再入院时间间隔(即,自上次从住院治疗出院以来的时间段,在此期间住院可被视为再入院)。将由两名评审员对文章进行筛选和评审,首先是独立进行,然后在需要达成共识时请第三名评审员参与。我们将通过表格和主题分析评估综述结果,注意研究特征和综述研究中出现的主题的普遍趋势。
这项工作正值许多精神卫生保健系统对高质量实践产生浓厚兴趣之际,这些实践将其护理过程结构化,以实现有效的从住院到门诊过渡。研究结果将支持系统对替代过渡干预措施的仔细检查,有助于确保他们经常有限的质量改进资源得到最佳利用。我们将通过强大的沟通基础设施和与卫生系统利益相关者的联系,将重点放在向医疗保健社区传播我们的研究结果上,我们的多学科研究顾问将在整个研究过程中建立这些联系。