Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, New York, Canada.
Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, New York, Canada
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e078479. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078479.
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a collaborative research approach that equally engages researchers and community stakeholders throughout all steps of the research process to facilitate social change and increase research relevance. Community advisory boards (CABs) are a CBPR tool in which individuals with lived experience and community organisations are integrated into the research process and ensure the work aligns with community priorities. We seek to (1) explore the best practices for the recruitment and engagement of people with lived experiences on CABs and (2) identify the scope of literature on minimising power dynamics between organisations and community members with lived experience who work on CABs together.
This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework, informed by Levac , and will be reported using a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) diagram. Detailed and robust search strategies have been developed for Embase, Medline and PsychINFO. Grey literature references and reference lists of included articles published between 1 January 1990 and 30 March 2023 will be considered. Two reviewers will independently screen references in two successive stages of title/abstract and full-text screening. Conflicts will be decided by consensus or a third reviewer. Thematic analysis will be applied in three phases: open coding, axial coding and abstraction. Extracted data will be recorded and presented in a tabular format and/or graphical summaries, with a descriptive overview discussing how the research findings relate to the research questions. At this time, a preliminary search of peer-reviewed and grey literature has been conducted. Search results for peer-reviewed literature have been uploaded to Covidence for review and appraisal for relevance.
Formal ethics approval is not required for this review. Review findings will inform ongoing and future CBPR community advisory board dynamics.
The protocol has been registered prospectively on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QF5D3).
社区参与式研究（CBPR）是一种协作研究方法，它在研究过程的所有步骤中平等地使研究人员和社区利益相关者参与进来，以促进社会变革和提高研究的相关性。社区咨询委员会（CAB）是一种 CBPR 工具，其中具有亲身经历的个人和社区组织被纳入研究过程中，以确保工作符合社区的优先事项。我们旨在：（1）探讨在 CAB 中招募和参与具有亲身经历的人的最佳实践；（2）确定关于最小化共同参与 CAB 的组织和具有亲身经历的社区成员之间权力动态的文献范围。
本范围综述将遵循阿特赛和奥马利的方法论框架，并参考列瓦克的方法，将使用 PRISMA（系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目）图进行报告。已经为 Embase、Medline 和 PsychINFO 制定了详细而强大的搜索策略。将考虑 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 3 月 30 日期间发表的灰色文献参考文献和纳入文章的参考文献列表。两位审稿人将独立筛选标题/摘要和全文筛选的两个连续阶段的参考文献。如有冲突，将通过协商或第三位审稿人决定。主题分析将分为三个阶段进行：开放式编码、轴向编码和抽象。提取的数据将以表格格式和/或图形摘要记录和呈现，并附有说明性概述，讨论研究结果与研究问题的关系。此时，已对同行评议和灰色文献进行了初步搜索。同行评议文献的搜索结果已上传至 Covidence 进行审查和评估相关性。
本综述不需要正式的伦理批准。审查结果将为正在进行和未来的 CBPR 社区咨询委员会动态提供信息。
该方案已在开放科学框架（https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QF5D3）上进行了前瞻性注册。
