• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球食品欺诈问题透视:世界卫生组织对国际食品安全当局网络(INFOSAN)成员的调查结果

Global perspectives on food fraud: results from a WHO survey of members of the International Food Safety Authorities Network (INFOSAN).

作者信息

Spink John, Embarek Peter Ben, Savelli Carmen Joseph, Bradshaw Adam

机构信息

1College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, 1129 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI 48864 USA.

2International Food Safety Authorities Network (INFOSAN) Management, Department of Food Safety and Zoonoses, World Health Organization (WHO), 20, Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.

出版信息

NPJ Sci Food. 2019 Jul 17;3:12. doi: 10.1038/s41538-019-0044-x. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1038/s41538-019-0044-x
PMID:31341950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6637146/
Abstract

This survey of International Food Safety Authorities Network (INFOSAN) members regarding food fraud prevention, management, education, and information sharing included 166 WHO member states that resulted in 175 responses. The respondents engage in food fraud prevention (70%) or are responsible for food fraud incident response (74%). Nearly all respondents acknowledged a desire for more guidance and information on best practices in managing the full range of "food safety events involving food fraud" (97%), but also for prevention of such events (97%), indicating a need to provide technical support beyond acute incident response. The scope of food fraud covered in the survey comprised the full range of fraudulent activities, including the addition of adulterant-substances, tampering (including mislabeling), theft, smuggling, gray market/diversion, and counterfeiting (intellectual property rights). Key needs included: capacity-building/education; a platform for information sharing; and utilization of INFOSAN as an interagency/intergovernmental collaboration point.

摘要

这项针对国际食品安全当局网络(INFOSAN)成员开展的有关食品欺诈预防、管理、教育和信息共享的调查涵盖了166个世卫组织成员国,共收到175份回复。受访者参与食品欺诈预防工作(70%)或负责应对食品欺诈事件(74%)。几乎所有受访者都承认,希望获得更多关于管理各类“涉及食品欺诈的食品安全事件”最佳做法的指导和信息(97%),同时也希望获得预防此类事件的指导和信息(97%),这表明除了应对突发事故外,还需要提供技术支持。调查涵盖的食品欺诈范围包括各类欺诈活动,如添加掺假物质、篡改(包括错误标签)、盗窃、走私、灰色市场/转移以及假冒(知识产权)。主要需求包括:能力建设/教育;信息共享平台;以及将INFOSAN用作跨机构/政府间协作点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3b/6637146/3bb1ad2dfd8f/41538_2019_44_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3b/6637146/3bb1ad2dfd8f/41538_2019_44_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3b/6637146/3bb1ad2dfd8f/41538_2019_44_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Global perspectives on food fraud: results from a WHO survey of members of the International Food Safety Authorities Network (INFOSAN).全球食品欺诈问题透视:世界卫生组织对国际食品安全当局网络(INFOSAN)成员的调查结果
NPJ Sci Food. 2019 Jul 17;3:12. doi: 10.1038/s41538-019-0044-x. eCollection 2019.
2
International Survey of Food Fraud and Related Terminology: Preliminary Results and Discussion.国际食品欺诈及相关术语调查:初步结果与讨论。
J Food Sci. 2019 Oct;84(10):2705-2718. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14705. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
The FAO/WHO International Food Safety Authorities Network in Review, 2004-2018: Learning from the Past and Looking to the Future.《粮农组织/世卫组织国际食品安全当局网络回顾,2004-2018:从过去学习,展望未来》。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2019 Jul;16(7):480-488. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2018.2582. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
4
Exploring the International Food Safety Authorities Network as a Community of Practice: Results from a Global Survey of Network Members.探索国际食品安全当局网络作为实践社区:对网络成员进行全球调查的结果。
J Food Prot. 2021 Feb 1;84(2):262-274. doi: 10.4315/JFP-20-313.
5
Exploring the Experiences of Members of the International Food Safety Authorities Network: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.探索国际食品安全当局网络成员的体验:一种解释性现象学分析。
J Food Prot. 2021 Oct 1;84(10):1683-1697. doi: 10.4315/JFP-21-171.
6
Looking Inside the International Food Safety Authorities Network Community Website.查看国际食品安全当局网络社区网站。
J Food Prot. 2020 Nov 1;83(11):1889-1899. doi: 10.4315/JFP-20-193.
7
A mixed-method exploration into the experience of members of the FAO/WHO International Food Safety Authorities Network (INFOSAN): study protocol.一项混合方法探索粮农组织/世卫组织国际食品安全当局网络(INFOSAN)成员体验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 22;9(5):e027091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027091.
8
Human Trafficking人口贩卖
9
[Analysis of international programs of the hygienic monitoring of foodborne pathogens].[食源性病原体卫生监测国际项目分析]
Vopr Pitan. 2012;81(6):12-8.
10
Consumer Perception of Food Fraud in Serbia and Montenegro.塞尔维亚和黑山消费者对食品欺诈的认知。
Foods. 2023 Dec 22;13(1):53. doi: 10.3390/foods13010053.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep Learning-Enhanced Spectroscopic Technologies for Food Quality Assessment: Convergence and Emerging Frontiers.用于食品质量评估的深度学习增强光谱技术:融合与新兴前沿
Foods. 2025 Jul 2;14(13):2350. doi: 10.3390/foods14132350.
2
Tracing the geographic origin of Atlantic cod products using stable isotope analysis.利用稳定同位素分析追踪大西洋鳕鱼产品的地理来源。
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2025 May;39 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e9861. doi: 10.1002/rcm.9861. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
3
Are online meatball restaurants in Indonesia committed to their declared Halal label?

本文引用的文献

1
Defining the public health threat of food fraud.定义食品欺诈对公共健康的威胁。
J Food Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;76(9):R157-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02417.x.
印度尼西亚的线上肉丸餐厅是否遵守其宣称的清真标签?
Vet World. 2024 Apr;17(4):778-784. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.778-784. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
4
Assessment of cheese frauds, and relevant detection methods: A systematic review.奶酪欺诈行为的评估及相关检测方法:一项系统综述
Food Chem X. 2023 Aug 6;19:100825. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100825. eCollection 2023 Oct 30.
5
Global trends and research hotspots on HACCP and modern quality management systems in the food industry.食品行业中危害分析与关键控制点(HACCP)及现代质量管理体系的全球趋势与研究热点
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 15;9(7):e18232. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18232. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Meat food fraud risk in Chinese markets 2012-2021.2012 - 2021年中国市场肉类食品欺诈风险
NPJ Sci Food. 2023 Apr 3;7(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41538-023-00189-z.
7
Media Source Characteristics Regarding Food Fraud Misinformation According to the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) in China: Comparative Study.根据中国健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)得出的食品欺诈错误信息的媒体来源特征:比较研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 16;6(3):e32302. doi: 10.2196/32302.
8
Considering Fraud Vulnerability Associated with Credence-Based Products Such as Organic Food.考虑与有机食品等基于信任的产品相关的欺诈漏洞。
Foods. 2021 Aug 14;10(8):1879. doi: 10.3390/foods10081879.
9
A Rapid Method for the Identification of Fresh and Processed Species against Frauds.一种针对欺诈行为识别新鲜及加工物种的快速方法。
Foods. 2020 Oct 2;9(10):1397. doi: 10.3390/foods9101397.