Walia S, Madhavan T, Reuman P, Tewari R, Duckworth D
Department of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan 48063.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Apr;7(2):279-84. doi: 10.1007/BF01963102.
The epidemiological methods of klebocin typing, antibiogram and plasmid DNA profile were evaluated using organisms isolated from a suspected epidemic of gentamicin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and unrelated strains from different geographical areas as controls. The electrophoretic analysis of plasmid DNAs from Klebsiella pneumoniae showed the presence of at least one and up to as many as seven plasmids in each strain. The molecular weight of plasmid DNAs ranged from 1 to greater than 70 mega daltons. While none of the control Klebsiella pneumoniae strains showed identical plasmid profiles, 63% of the epidemic-related Klebsiella pneumoniae strains did. Klebocin typing and plasmid DNA profile gave different results for the same strains. Plasmid DNA profile was found to be a more valuable method than klebocin typing alone or klebocin typing in combination with antibiogram for differentiating epidemiologically related from unrelated isolates. Both plasmid DNA profile and klebocin typing methods were superior to antibiogram.
利用从疑似耐庆大霉素肺炎克雷伯菌流行中分离出的菌株以及来自不同地理区域的无关菌株作为对照,对klebocin分型、抗菌谱和质粒DNA图谱的流行病学方法进行了评估。肺炎克雷伯菌质粒DNA的电泳分析显示,每个菌株中至少存在一个质粒,最多可达七个质粒。质粒DNA的分子量范围为1至大于70兆道尔顿。虽然对照肺炎克雷伯菌菌株均未显示出相同的质粒图谱,但63%的与流行相关的肺炎克雷伯菌菌株显示出相同的质粒图谱。对于同一菌株,klebocin分型和质粒DNA图谱给出了不同的结果。发现质粒DNA图谱是一种比单独的klebocin分型或klebocin分型与抗菌谱结合更有价值的方法,用于区分流行病学相关和不相关的分离株。质粒DNA图谱和klebocin分型方法均优于抗菌谱。