Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(11):3517-3525. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07583-6. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
The feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) disease who convert to clinically node-negative (cN0) disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been evaluated in several large clinical trials, but it remains unclear whether the approach has been broadly adopted in the United States.
The National Cancer Database was used to identify women diagnosed with cN+ breast cancer who received NAC followed by surgery between 2012 and 2015. Trends in axillary surgery were evaluated and multivariable logistic regression analyses performed to determine factors associated with receipt of SLNB.
Of 12,965 women cN+ at baseline, the use of SLNB increased from 31.8% in 2012 to 49% in 2015 (p < 0.001). Using axillary pCR as a surrogate for patients who convert to cN0 following NAC, among 5127 (39.5%) ypN0 patients, SLNB increased from 38.2 to 58.4% over the study period (p < 0.001), resulting in avoidance of axillary dissection in 42.2% of ypN0 patients by 2015. In adjusted analyses, factors significantly associated with SLNB attempt included cN1 disease, age < 45 years, treatment facility type, triple-negative and HER2-positive subtypes, and year of diagnosis. In women with residual isolated tumor cells (ITCs), micrometastases, and ypN1 disease, SLNB was the only axillary procedure performed in 36.9%, 23.6%, and 13.0% of cases.
The use of SLNB in cN+ patients receiving NAC increased significantly between 2012 and 2015. SLNB alone was performed in more than 10% of patients with ypN1 disease, 20% with micrometastases, and 35% with ITCs; the oncologic safety of omitting axillary dissection in these patients requires further evaluation.
在接受新辅助化疗(NAC)后临床淋巴结阳性(cN+)疾病转为临床淋巴结阴性(cN0)疾病的患者中,前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的可行性已在几项大型临床试验中进行了评估,但在美国是否广泛采用该方法尚不清楚。
利用国家癌症数据库,确定了 2012 年至 2015 年间接受 NAC 治疗后行手术的 cN+乳腺癌女性患者。评估了腋窝手术趋势,并进行多变量逻辑回归分析以确定与 SLNB 接受相关的因素。
在基线时 12965 名 cN+的女性中,SLNB 的使用率从 2012 年的 31.8%增加到 2015 年的 49%(p<0.001)。以腋部病理完全缓解(pCR)作为 NAC 后转为 cN0 患者的替代指标,在 5127 名(39.5%)ypN0 患者中,SLNB 的使用率在研究期间从 38.2%增加到 58.4%(p<0.001),导致 2015 年 ypN0 患者中有 42.2%避免了腋窝清扫。在调整后的分析中,与 SLNB 尝试显著相关的因素包括 cN1 疾病、年龄<45 岁、治疗设施类型、三阴性和 HER2 阳性亚型以及诊断年份。在残留孤立肿瘤细胞(ITC)、微转移和 ypN1 疾病的女性中,SLNB 是唯一的腋窝手术,分别占 36.9%、23.6%和 13.0%的病例。
在接受 NAC 的 cN+患者中,SLNB 的使用率从 2012 年到 2015 年显著增加。在 ypN1 疾病、微转移和 ITC 患者中,10%以上、20%和 35%的患者仅行 SLNB,这些患者省略腋窝清扫的肿瘤安全性需要进一步评估。