• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受创伤焦点认知行为疗法治疗的青少年的治疗结果轨迹和可能的预测因素。

Trajectories and possible predictors of treatment outcome for youth receiving trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University of Ulm.

出版信息

Psychol Trauma. 2020 May;12(4):336-346. doi: 10.1037/tra0000482. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1037/tra0000482
PMID:31343205
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Even though there is strong evidence for the effectiveness of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) for trauma-exposed youth, there are still youth who continue to struggle with posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) after treatment. Investigating treatment trajectories and predictors of symptom change can increase our understanding of factors associated with nonresponse so that trauma treatment can be optimized.

METHOD

The sample consisted of 155 youths (M age = 13.9 years, SD = 2.8, 72.3% girls) who received TF-CBT. To examine whether different treatment trajectories could be identified, growth mixture models with linear effects of time were estimated based on Clinical-Administered PTSD-Scale (CAPS-CA) scores at pretreatment, posttreatment and follow-up. We further explored whether gender, age, trauma type, comorbid depression and anxiety, and posttraumatic cognitions were associated with treatment response.

RESULTS

The participants' trajectories could best be represented by 2 latent classes; nonresponders (21% of the sample) and responders (79% of the sample). The nonresponder group was characterized by a higher pretreatment PTSS level and slower improvement in PTSS compared with the responder group. Gender was the only significant predictor, where girls were more likely to be assigned to the nonresponder group.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that clinicians need to be aware that girls and youth with high levels of pretreatment PTSS may be at risk of nonresponse. The results support previous findings showing that TF-CBT is suitable across different age groups and can be an effective treatment for youth with a range of traumatic experiences and additional comorbid symptoms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

尽管有大量证据表明创伤焦点认知行为疗法(TF-CBT)对创伤后青少年有效,但仍有一些青少年在治疗后继续遭受创伤后应激症状(PTSS)的困扰。研究治疗轨迹和症状变化的预测因素可以增加我们对与无反应相关的因素的理解,从而优化创伤治疗。

方法

该样本包括 155 名青少年(M 年龄= 13.9 岁,SD = 2.8,72.3%为女孩),他们接受了 TF-CBT。为了检查是否可以确定不同的治疗轨迹,根据治疗前、治疗后和随访时的临床管理 PTSD 量表(CAPS-CA)评分,估计了具有线性时间效应的增长混合模型。我们进一步探讨了性别、年龄、创伤类型、共病抑郁和焦虑以及创伤后认知是否与治疗反应相关。

结果

参与者的轨迹最好用 2 个潜在类别来表示;无反应者(样本的 21%)和反应者(样本的 79%)。无反应者组的 PTSD 水平较高,与反应者组相比,PTSD 改善较慢。性别是唯一显著的预测因素,女孩更有可能被分配到无反应者组。

结论

研究结果表明,临床医生需要意识到,女孩和 PTSD 水平较高的青少年可能存在无反应的风险。结果支持先前的研究结果,表明 TF-CBT 适合不同年龄组,并且可以作为一种有效的治疗方法,适用于具有一系列创伤经历和其他共病症状的青少年。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Trajectories and possible predictors of treatment outcome for youth receiving trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy.接受创伤焦点认知行为疗法治疗的青少年的治疗结果轨迹和可能的预测因素。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 May;12(4):336-346. doi: 10.1037/tra0000482. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
2
Changes in posttraumatic stress symptoms, cognitions, and depression during treatment of traumatized youth.创伤后应激症状、认知和抑郁在创伤后青少年治疗中的变化。
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Dec;111:119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
3
A Follow-Up Study from a Multisite, Randomized Controlled Trial for Traumatized Children Receiving TF-CBT.创伤后应激障碍儿童接受 TF-CBT 的多中心随机对照试验的随访研究。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 Nov;45(8):1587-1597. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0270-0.
4
Changes in the trauma narratives of youth receiving trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy in relation to posttraumatic stress symptoms.创伤聚焦认知行为疗法治疗青少年创伤后应激症状的创伤叙事变化。
Psychother Res. 2019 Jan;29(1):99-111. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1303208. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
5
Predictors of nonresponse and drop-out among children and adolescents receiving TF-CBT: investigation of client-, therapist-, and implementation factors.接受 TF-CBT 的儿童和青少年无反应和脱落的预测因素:对客户、治疗师和实施因素的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 29;22(1):1212. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08497-y.
6
Parental dysfunctional posttraumatic cognitions in trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for children and adolescents.创伤聚焦认知行为疗法中儿童和青少年创伤后父母认知功能障碍。
Psychol Trauma. 2019 Oct;11(7):722-731. doi: 10.1037/tra0000419. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
7
Change in post-traumatic cognitions mediates treatment effects for traumatized youth-A randomized controlled trial.创伤后认知变化中介了创伤青少年的治疗效果——一项随机对照试验。
J Couns Psychol. 2018 Mar;65(2):166-177. doi: 10.1037/cou0000258.
8
Therapists' behaviors and youths' therapeutic alliance during trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy.治疗师在创伤聚焦认知行为疗法中的行为和青少年的治疗联盟。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Apr;88(4):350-361. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000465. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
9
The relationship between youth involvement, alliance and outcome in trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy.创伤聚焦认知行为疗法中青年参与、联盟与结果的关系。
Psychother Res. 2023 Mar;33(3):316-327. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2022.2123719. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
10
Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Eight German Mental Health Clinics.创伤焦点认知行为疗法对儿童和青少年的疗效:八项德国精神卫生诊所的随机对照试验。
Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85(3):159-70. doi: 10.1159/000442824. Epub 2016 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical decision-making in the treatment of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders in Australia.澳大利亚儿童和青少年焦虑症治疗中的临床决策
Aust J Psychol. 2025 Mar 3;77(1):2470459. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2025.2470459. eCollection 2025.
2
Family therapy and EMDR after child abuse and neglect: moderating effects of child attachment style and PTSD symptoms on treatment outcome.儿童虐待和忽视后的家庭治疗和 EMDR:儿童依恋风格和 PTSD 症状对治疗结果的调节作用。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2416288. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2416288. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
3
Distinct saliva DNA methylation profiles in relation to treatment outcome in youth with posttraumatic stress disorder.
创伤后应激障碍青少年治疗结果相关的独特唾液 DNA 甲基化图谱。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 26;14(1):309. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-02892-1.
4
Validation of the Capacity for the Psychotherapy Process Scale for Use in Adolescent Patients.验证《心理治疗过程量表》在青少年患者中的适用性。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Oct;52(10):1533-1549. doi: 10.1007/s10802-024-01209-6. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
5
Application of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy among children and adolescents with childhood household dysfunction.创伤聚焦认知行为疗法在儿童期家庭功能障碍儿童和青少年中的应用。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jan 28;49(1):145-152. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.230333.
6
Promising Effect of the Children in Disaster: Evaluation and Recovery Intervention on Trauma Symptoms and Quality of Life for Children and Adolescents: A Controlled Study.灾难中的儿童的积极影响:儿童和青少年创伤症状及生活质量的评估与恢复干预:一项对照研究
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Feb;21(2):123-132. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0202. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
7
Drop-out and ineffective treatment in youth with severe and enduring mental health problems: a systematic review.青少年严重且持久的心理健康问题中的辍学和无效治疗:系统评价。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;33(10):3305-3319. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02182-z. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
8
Predictors of nonresponse and drop-out among children and adolescents receiving TF-CBT: investigation of client-, therapist-, and implementation factors.接受 TF-CBT 的儿童和青少年无反应和脱落的预测因素:对客户、治疗师和实施因素的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 29;22(1):1212. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08497-y.
9
Evaluation of an Early Intervention Model for Child and Adolescent Victims of Interpersonal Violence.人际暴力儿童及青少年受害者早期干预模式的评估
Children (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;8(10):941. doi: 10.3390/children8100941.
10
Predictors and moderators of treatment outcome for single incident paediatric PTSD: a multi-centre randomized clinical trial.单发性儿童 PTSD 治疗结果的预测因素和调节因素:一项多中心随机临床试验。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Sep 30;12(1):1968138. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1968138. eCollection 2021.