Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚儿童和青少年焦虑症治疗中的临床决策

Clinical decision-making in the treatment of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders in Australia.

作者信息

Bertie Lizél-Antoinette, Hudson Jennifer L

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Aust J Psychol. 2025 Mar 3;77(1):2470459. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2025.2470459. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recent evidence that few help-seeking children and adolescents receive evidence-based care for anxiety in Australia highlighted the need for an increased understanding of clinical decision-making in this field. This article reports on a survey that explored the perspective of clinicians regarding the care they provide for children and adolescents with anxiety disorders, and the factors influencing this decision-making process. Underlying decision-making constructs were investigated, including theoretical orientation, assessment, treatment planning and techniques, attitudes towards research and sources used to support clinical practice. Willingness to engage with clinical decision support was also examined.

METHOD

A sample of Australian mental health practitioners ( = 42) completed an online survey investigating clinical treatment decisions and the principles underlying their choices.

RESULTS

Generally, clinicians subscribe to more than one theoretical orientation, with a majority incorporating a CBT approach. Clinical assessment and treatment formulation processes aligned with evidence-based practices and recommendations. Most clinicians reported high esteem for research to inform both their theoretical approach and clinical practice, and most respondents indicated interest in user-testing a decision support tool.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to earlier research, Australian clinicians self-report routine employment of evidence-based practices to guide clinical assessment, treatment formulation and treatment delivery in their practices.

摘要

目的

近期有证据表明,在澳大利亚,很少有寻求帮助的儿童和青少年能获得针对焦虑症的循证护理,这凸显了增进对该领域临床决策理解的必要性。本文报告了一项调查,该调查探讨了临床医生对他们为患有焦虑症的儿童和青少年提供护理的看法,以及影响这一决策过程的因素。对潜在的决策结构进行了调查,包括理论取向、评估、治疗计划和技术、对研究的态度以及用于支持临床实践的信息来源。还研究了参与临床决策支持的意愿。

方法

澳大利亚心理健康从业者样本(n = 42)完成了一项在线调查,调查临床治疗决策及其选择背后的原则。

结果

总体而言,临床医生采用不止一种理论取向,大多数人采用认知行为疗法。临床评估和治疗方案制定过程与循证实践和建议一致。大多数临床医生高度重视研究对其理论方法和临床实践的指导作用,大多数受访者表示有兴趣对决策支持工具进行用户测试。

结论

与早期研究不同,澳大利亚临床医生自我报告在其临床实践中常规采用循证实践来指导临床评估、治疗方案制定和治疗实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64b0/12218447/c1c6ccefa00f/RAUP_A_2470459_F0001_OC.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验