Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human.
Dev Psychol. 2019 Oct;55(10):2090-2101. doi: 10.1037/dev0000764. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
Complexity is one of the major demands of adolescents' future life as adults. To investigate adolescents' competence development in applying problem-solving strategies in complex environments, we conducted a 2-wave longitudinal study in a sample of Finnish adolescents (11-17 years old; = 1,959 at Time 1 and = 1,690 at Time 2, 3 years later). In this study, we aimed to: (a) determine the optimal number of strategy use profiles while solving complex problems, (b) determine the number of meaningful developmental paths for each profile, and (c) test the impact of reasoning abilities and learning-related motivational beliefs on the probability that an adolescent with a given strategy use profile will take a given developmental path. Using latent transition analysis, we found 4 meaningful strategy use profiles: and . Forty-three percent of the participants were classified as having the same strategy use profile in Time 1 and Time 2. The strategy use of 34% was assessed as having improved between Time 1 and Time 2, while that of 21% was assessed as having declined between Time 1 and Time 2. Verbal reasoning ability and learning-related motivational beliefs predicted whether the developmental path of ' was more likely to remain stable, improve, or decline over time. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
复杂性是青少年未来成年生活的主要要求之一。为了研究青少年在复杂环境中应用解决问题策略的能力发展,我们在芬兰青少年样本中进行了一项 2 波纵向研究(第 1 次测量时,N = 1959;3 年后的第 2 次测量时,N = 1690)。在这项研究中,我们旨在:(a)确定在解决复杂问题时使用策略的最佳数量;(b)确定每个模式的有意义的发展路径数量;(c)测试推理能力和与学习相关的动机信念对具有特定策略使用模式的青少年采取特定发展路径的可能性的影响。使用潜在转变分析,我们发现了 4 种有意义的策略使用模式:积极进取型、犹豫不决型、消极被动型和不思进取型。43%的参与者在第 1 次和第 2 次测量中被归类为具有相同的策略使用模式。34%的策略使用被评估为在第 1 次和第 2 次测量之间有所改善,而 21%的策略使用被评估为在第 1 次和第 2 次测量之间有所下降。言语推理能力和与学习相关的动机信念预测了“积极进取型”的发展路径是否更有可能保持稳定、改善或随时间推移而下降。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。