Suppr超能文献

从认知角度分析复杂问题解决策略:思维技能的作用。

Analysing Complex Problem-Solving Strategies from a Cognitive Perspective: The Role of Thinking Skills.

作者信息

Wu Hao, Molnár Gyöngyvér

机构信息

MTA-SZTE Digital Learning Technologies Research Group, Center for Learning and Instruction, University of Szeged, 6722 Szeged, Hungary.

MTA-SZTE Digital Learning Technologies Research Group, Institute of Education, University of Szeged, 6722 Szeged, Hungary.

出版信息

J Intell. 2022 Jul 25;10(3):46. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030046.

Abstract

Complex problem solving (CPS) is considered to be one of the most important skills for successful learning. In an effort to explore the nature of CPS, this study aims to investigate the role of inductive reasoning (IR) and combinatorial reasoning (CR) in the problem-solving process of students using statistically distinguishable exploration strategies in the CPS environment. The sample was drawn from a group of university students (N = 1343). The tests were delivered via the eDia online assessment platform. Latent class analyses were employed to seek students whose problem-solving strategies showed similar patterns. Four qualitatively different class profiles were identified: (1) 84.3% of the students were proficient strategy users, (2) 6.2% were rapid learners, (3) 3.1% were non-persistent explorers, and (4) 6.5% were non-performing explorers. Better exploration strategy users showed greater development in thinking skills, and the roles of IR and CR in the CPS process were varied for each type of strategy user. To sum up, the analysis identified students' problem-solving behaviours in respect of exploration strategy in the CPS environment and detected a number of remarkable differences in terms of the use of thinking skills between students with different exploration strategies.

摘要

复杂问题解决(CPS)被认为是成功学习最重要的技能之一。为了探究CPS的本质,本研究旨在调查归纳推理(IR)和组合推理(CR)在使用CPS环境中统计上可区分的探索策略的学生解决问题过程中的作用。样本来自一组大学生(N = 1343)。测试通过eDia在线评估平台进行。采用潜在类别分析来寻找解决问题策略表现出相似模式的学生。确定了四种质的不同的类别特征:(1)84.3%的学生是熟练的策略使用者,(2)6.2%是快速学习者,(3)3.1%是不坚持的探索者,(4)6.5%是表现不佳的探索者。更好的探索策略使用者在思维技能方面有更大的发展,并且IR和CR在CPS过程中的作用因每种策略使用者类型而异。总之,该分析确定了学生在CPS环境中关于探索策略的问题解决行为,并发现不同探索策略的学生在思维技能使用方面存在一些显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d76/9332318/988a3d0beba4/jintelligence-10-00046-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验