Suppr超能文献

头颈部癌症的诱导化疗:结果与争议。

Induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: Results and controversies.

机构信息

Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Léon Bérard, Lyon-I University, Lyon, France.

Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Léon Bérard, Lyon-I University, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2019 Aug;95:164-169. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

Abstract

Standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) consists mainly of concurrent chemoradiation (CCR) but induction chemotherapy (IC) by docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil (TPF), followed by CCR, is a strong option. Comparative trials suggest that IC and CCR are equivalent, and some trials suggest superiority of IC, whereas none shows inferiority. IC might have less interest in oropharyngeal cancer (more often linked to HPV infection). When functional laryngeal preservation is the patient's priority, essays strongly suggest that IC is the best treatment. There is little data about a less toxic regimen of IC, but several schemes are promising and need to be developed. An early selection of responders to IC by metabolic imaging must be considered. Intensification attempts with cetuximab were too toxic and unsafe, but trials with immunotherapy are ongoing to enhance TPF efficacy. After IC, CCR either with cetuximab or cisplatin seems to be equally effective.

摘要

局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LAHNSCC)的标准治疗主要包括同期放化疗(CCR),但多西他赛-顺铂-氟尿嘧啶(TPF)诱导化疗(IC)后行 CCR 也是一种强有力的选择。比较试验表明 IC 和 CCR 等效,一些试验表明 IC 具有优势,而没有试验表明其劣势。IC 可能对口咽癌(更常与 HPV 感染相关)的兴趣不大。当患者优先考虑保留功能性喉时,强烈建议 IC 是最佳治疗方法。关于毒性较小的 IC 方案的数据较少,但有几个方案很有前途,需要进一步开发。通过代谢成像对 IC 的早期应答者进行选择必须被考虑。使用西妥昔单抗的强化尝试毒性太大且不安全,但正在进行免疫治疗试验以提高 TPF 的疗效。IC 后,无论是联合西妥昔单抗还是顺铂的 CCR 似乎同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验