• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏病问卷(HDFQ)的有效性和可靠性:一种 Rasch 测量模型方法。

Validity and reliability of the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire (HDFQ): a Rasch measurement model approach.

机构信息

Institute of Health Sciences, Internal Medicine Nursing Doctorate Programme, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, 35340, Turkey.

Department of Internal Medicine Nursing, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Nursing, Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Apr;14(2):154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.pcd.2019.06.006
PMID:31345682
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire (HDFQ) as a measure to evaluate heart disease risk knowledge in individuals with diabetes.

METHODS

This study was conducted in the primary care clinic on 326 individuals with type 2 diabetes. The Davis Method, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and the Rasch Measurement Model used in the validity and reliability analyses.

RESULTS

The validity analysis results showed Turkish version of HDFQ was content valid. The results of CFA showed the index results were very good fit. All items of the scale and the HDFQ were fit to the Rasch model and the items did not contain any differential item function. Person Separation Index showed HDFQ is reliable tool.

CONCLUSIONS

The Rasch Model provides an alternative way in dealing with the challenges faced in classic methods and it is recommended to be used in health sciences. Thus, the results of this study are important. Results show that the Turkish version of the HDFQ can be used for determining awareness of heart disease risk as well as for assessing the effectiveness of implemented interventions among individuals with diabetes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验土耳其版心脏病知识问卷(HDFQ)作为评估糖尿病患者心脏病风险知识的测量工具的有效性和可靠性。

方法

本研究在初级保健诊所对 326 名 2 型糖尿病患者进行。采用 Davis 法、验证性因素分析(CFA)和 Rasch 测量模型进行有效性和可靠性分析。

结果

有效性分析结果表明,土耳其版 HDFQ 具有内容有效性。CFA 的结果表明指数结果非常吻合。量表的所有条目和 HDFQ 都符合 Rasch 模型,且条目不包含任何差异项目功能。个体分离指数表明 HDFQ 是一种可靠的工具。

结论

Rasch 模型为处理经典方法所面临的挑战提供了一种替代方法,建议在健康科学中使用。因此,这项研究的结果很重要。结果表明,土耳其版 HDFQ 可用于确定糖尿病患者的心脏病风险意识,以及评估针对该人群实施干预的效果。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire (HDFQ): a Rasch measurement model approach.心脏病问卷(HDFQ)的有效性和可靠性:一种 Rasch 测量模型方法。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Apr;14(2):154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
2
Development of a questionnaire to measure heart disease risk knowledge in people with diabetes: the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire.开发一份用于测量糖尿病患者心脏病风险知识的问卷:心脏病事实问卷。
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jul;58(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.07.004.
3
Translation and adaptation of the French version of the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire - Rheumatoid Arthritis (HDFQ-RA 1&2).《心脏病问卷 - 类风湿关节炎(HDFQ-RA 1&2)》法译版的翻译和改编。
Joint Bone Spine. 2017 Dec;84(6):693-698. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
4
Establishing the HLS-Q12 short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire: latent trait analyses applying Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.建立欧洲健康素养调查问卷的HLS-Q12简版:应用拉施模型和验证性因素分析的潜在特质分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3275-7.
5
The factor structure of the Turkish version of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease.土耳其版修订版疾病感知问卷(IPQ-R)在糖尿病和心血管疾病患者中的因子结构。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 9;12:852. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-852.
6
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry (TREALD-30).土耳其语版成人牙科识字快速评估量表(TREALD - 30)的信度和效度
Acta Odontol Scand. 2017 Apr;75(3):198-207. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2016.1278079. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
7
Knowledge of heart disease risk in a multicultural community sample of people with diabetes.多元文化社区糖尿病患者样本中心脏病风险的相关知识。
Ann Behav Med. 2006 Jun;31(3):224-30. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3103_3.
8
Development and initial validation of a heart disease knowledge questionnaire for people with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者心脏病知识问卷的编制及初步验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Oct;77(1):136-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire (HDFQ) in people with diabetes in Iran.伊朗糖尿病患者心中疾病问卷(HDFQ)波斯语版本的心理计量评估。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022 Jul;16(7):102563. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102563. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
10
Validation of the Knowledge and Perception of Cardiovascular Risk Factors Questionnaires for College Students.大学生心血管危险因素调查问卷的知识与认知验证
J Nurs Meas. 2016;24(2):202-14. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.24.2.202.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Available Cardiovascular Disease Knowledge Tools: A Systematic Review.现有心血管疾病知识工具的质量:一项系统综述
Glob Heart. 2025 Jul 9;20(1):59. doi: 10.5334/gh.1446. eCollection 2025.
2
Social Phenotyping for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Electronic Health Registries.社会表型分析在电子健康档案中的心血管风险分层。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2024 Sep;26(9):485-497. doi: 10.1007/s11883-024-01222-6. Epub 2024 Jul 8.