• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对住院医师的输血安全与适宜性在线教育模块:一项前后对照的质量改进研究。

An online educational module on transfusion safety and appropriateness for resident physicians: a controlled before-after quality-improvement study.

作者信息

Lee Todd C, Murray Jennifer, McDonald Emily G

机构信息

Clinical Practice Assessment Unit (Lee, Murray, McDonald) and Division of General Internal Medicine (Lee, McDonald), Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.

出版信息

CMAJ Open. 2019 Jul 25;7(3):E492-E496. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180211. Print 2019 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20180211
PMID:31345787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6658213/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several professional societies have made value-based statements in support of restrictive transfusion strategies. The aim of this study was to determine whether completion of an accredited online training program in transfusion safety could improve transfusion knowledge among medical residents and increase transfusion appropriateness.

METHODS

We performed a controlled before-after evaluation of a mandatory accredited self-directed training program (Bloody Easy Lite for Physicians) that provides education about transfusion medicine on a 47-bed medical clinical teaching unit at a university-affiliated hospital centre in Montréal. The program consists of 2 modules and takes about 30 minutes to complete. We used the 45-bed medical teaching unit at another Montréal hospital as a contemporary control. We compared resident physicians' pre- and posttest scores and evaluated the impact on transfusion appropriateness by comparing the proportion occurring below a hemoglobin concentration of 80 g/L before (April 2013-June 2015) and after (July 2015-January 2016) the intervention.

RESULTS

Of the 55 residents on the intervention unit, 53 (96%) completed the training. The median pretest score was 50% (inter-quartile range [IQR] 40%-60%). The median posttest score was 90% (IQR 80%-90%) for module 1 and 80% (IQR 80%-90%) for module 2 ( < 0.001 for both pre-post comparisons). The proportion of transfusions below 80 g/L increased from 80.1% to 86.9% ( = 0.04) on the intervention unit and remained relatively unchanged on the control unit (75.6% v. 71.1%, = 0.4). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the units in the proportion of transfusions below 80 g/L before the intervention ( = 0.07), a significant difference was observed after the intervention ( = 0.002).

INTERPRETATION

Mandatory training in transfusion safety via an online program resulted in improved transfusion knowledge among residents and an increase in the proportion of transfusions occurring at a hemoglobin concentration below 80 g/L. This low-cost educational initiative may improve transfusion appropriateness.

摘要

背景

多个专业协会已发表基于价值的声明,支持限制性输血策略。本研究的目的是确定完成经认可的输血安全在线培训项目是否能提高住院医师的输血知识,并增加输血的合理性。

方法

我们对一个强制性的经认可的自主培训项目(针对医生的简易输血课程)进行了前后对照评估,该项目在蒙特利尔一家大学附属医院中心的一个拥有47张床位的内科临床教学单元提供输血医学教育。该项目由2个模块组成,大约需要30分钟完成。我们将蒙特利尔另一家医院的拥有45张床位的内科教学单元作为同期对照。我们比较了住院医师的测试前和测试后分数,并通过比较干预前(2013年4月至2015年6月)和干预后(2015年7月至2016年1月)血红蛋白浓度低于80g/L时输血比例的变化,评估了对输血合理性的影响。

结果

干预单元的55名住院医师中,53名(96%)完成了培训。测试前分数中位数为50%(四分位间距[IQR]40%-60%)。模块1测试后分数中位数为90%(IQR 80%-90%),模块2为80%(IQR 80%-90%)(前后比较均P<0.001)。干预单元血红蛋白浓度低于80g/L时的输血比例从80.1%增至86.9%(P=0.04),而对照单元相对保持不变(75.6%对71.1%,P=0.4)。尽管干预前各单元血红蛋白浓度低于80g/L时的输血比例差异无统计学意义(P=0.07),但干预后差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。

解读

通过在线项目进行输血安全强制性培训可提高住院医师的输血知识,并增加血红蛋白浓度低于80g/L时输血的比例。这项低成本的教育举措可能会提高输血的合理性。

相似文献

1
An online educational module on transfusion safety and appropriateness for resident physicians: a controlled before-after quality-improvement study.针对住院医师的输血安全与适宜性在线教育模块:一项前后对照的质量改进研究。
CMAJ Open. 2019 Jul 25;7(3):E492-E496. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180211. Print 2019 Jul-Sep.
2
Interactive Online Module Failed to Improve Sustained Knowledge of the Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Form.交互式在线模块未能提高对《马里兰州维持生命治疗医嘱表》的持续了解。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Jun;13(6):926-32. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-738OC.
3
A controlled trial of educational outreach to improve blood transfusion practice.一项旨在改善输血实践的教育推广对照试验。
JAMA. 1993 Aug 25;270(8):961-6.
4
Pediatric Emergency Medicine Online Curriculum Improves Resident Knowledge Scores, But Will They Use It?儿科急诊医学在线课程提高了住院医师的知识得分,但他们会使用它吗?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Nov;33(11):713-717. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000679.
5
Evaluation of a pediatric intensive care residency curriculum.儿科重症监护住院医师培训课程评估
Crit Care Med. 1997 Nov;25(11):1898-903. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199711000-00031.
6
Blood transfusion knowledge of surgical residents: is an educational intervention effective?外科住院医师的输血知识:教育干预是否有效?
Transfusion. 2017 Apr;57(4):965-970. doi: 10.1111/trf.14005. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
Evaluating appropriate red blood cell transfusions: a quality audit at 10 Ontario hospitals to determine the optimal measure for assessing appropriateness.评估适当的红细胞输血:安大略省10家医院的质量审核,以确定评估适当性的最佳指标。
Transfusion. 2016 Oct;56(10):2466-2476. doi: 10.1111/trf.13737. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
8
A survey of resident physicians' knowledge concerning transfusion medicine in Shiraz, Iran.伊朗设拉子住院医师输血医学知识调查
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2014 Jul;8(2):118-20. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.137451.
9
Catatonia Education: Needs Assessment and Brief Online Intervention.紧张症教育:需求评估与简短在线干预
Acad Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;41(3):360-363. doi: 10.1007/s40596-016-0632-x. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
10
Curricula for Teaching MRI Safety, and MRI and CT Contrast Safety to Residents: How Effective Are Live Lectures and Online Modules?向住院医师传授MRI安全以及MRI与CT造影剂安全的课程:现场讲座和在线模块的效果如何?
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Oct;12(10):1093-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge assessment of Tunisian junior doctors in transfusion medicine.突尼斯初级医生在输血医学方面的知识评估。
Future Sci OA. 2025 Dec;11(1):2484166. doi: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2484166. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
Let Us Know Transfusion Triggers for Prophylactic Use of Platelet Concentrate-Analysis of Compliance with Recent Transfusion Guidelines in a Large Academic Medical Center.让我们了解预防性使用血小板浓缩物的输血触发因素——对一家大型学术医疗中心近期输血指南依从性的分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 10;12(18):5885. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185885.
3
Development of a national out-of-hospital transfusion protocol: a modified RAND Delphi study.制定国家院外输血方案:改良版 RAND 德尔菲研究。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Jun 27;11(3):E546-E559. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220151. Print 2023 May-Jun.
4
Comparison of Blood Transfusion Rates Before and After Implementation of a Quality Improvement Initiative for Transfusion Safety and Appropriateness.输血安全与适宜性质量改进举措实施前后输血率的比较
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2252253. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.52253.

本文引用的文献

1
Behaviour modification interventions to optimise red blood cell transfusion practices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.优化红细胞输血实践的行为改变干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 18;8(5):e019912. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019912.
2
Clinical Practice Guidelines From the AABB: Red Blood Cell Transfusion Thresholds and Storage.美国血库协会临床实践指南:红细胞输注阈值与储存
JAMA. 2016 Nov 15;316(19):2025-2035. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9185.
3
Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion.输血阈值及指导异体红细胞输血的其他策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 12;10(10):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub4.
4
Early Trends Among Seven Recommendations From the Choosing Wisely Campaign.早期趋势在明智选择运动的七个建议中。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1913-20. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5441.
5
The impact of electronic decision support on transfusion practice: a systematic review.电子决策支持对输血实践的影响:一项系统评价。
Transfus Med Rev. 2015 Jan;29(1):14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
6
Red blood cell transfusion: impact of an education program and a clinical guideline on transfusion practice.红细胞输血:一项教育计划和临床指南对输血实践的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2014 Dec;9(12):745-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2237. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
7
Improved blood utilization using real-time clinical decision support.实时临床决策支持可提高血液利用率。
Transfusion. 2014 May;54(5):1358-65. doi: 10.1111/trf.12445. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
8
Alternatives to blood transfusion.输血的替代方法。
Lancet. 2013 May 25;381(9880):1855-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60808-9.
9
Transfusion strategies for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.急性上消化道出血的输血策略。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 3;368(1):11-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211801.
10
Liberal or restrictive transfusion in high-risk patients after hip surgery.髋关节手术后高危患者的自由输血或限制性输血。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2453-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012452. Epub 2011 Dec 14.