Fu Long-Fei, Monro Alexandre K, Wen Fang, Xin Zi-Bing, Wei Yi-Gang, Zhang Zhi-Xiang
Laboratory of Systematic Evolution and Biogeography of Woody Plants, College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China Beijing Forestry University Beijing China.
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, China Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences Guilin China.
PhytoKeys. 2019 Jul 12;126:79-88. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.126.35707. eCollection 2019.
Of the 280 species of documented in China, 189 are known only from a single collection. is one such species, having been known only from the type collection for nearly half a century, until recent field investigations in Guangxi. Due to its morphological similarity to and , we undertook a critical review of all three species using morphological and molecular evidence. Our results suggest that all three names refer to the same species, which based on priority should be known as We recognize and as synonyms. A distribution map of and the extinction risk according to the IUCN criteria is provided. After recircumscription, the taxon must be considered as Least Concern (LC).
在中国记录的280个物种中，189个仅从单一标本中得知。[物种名称1]就是这样一个物种，在近半个世纪里仅从模式标本中为人所知，直到最近在广西进行的野外调查。由于它在形态上与[物种名称2]和[物种名称3]相似，我们利用形态学和分子证据对这三个物种进行了严格审查。我们的结果表明，这三个名称指的是同一物种，根据优先权，该物种应称为[物种名称1]。我们将[物种名称2]和[物种名称3]视为同义词。提供了[物种名称1]的分布图以及根据世界自然保护联盟标准的灭绝风险。重新界定后，该分类群必须被视为无危（LC）。
