• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家质量报告网络(NQRN)注册库成熟度框架:评估临床注册库的能力与应用

The NQRN Registry Maturational Framework: Evaluating the Capability and Use of Clinical Registries.

作者信息

Blumenthal Seth

机构信息

American Medical Association, US.

出版信息

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Jul 17;7(1):29. doi: 10.5334/egems.278.

DOI:10.5334/egems.278
PMID:31346544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6640257/
Abstract

Clinical registries are increasingly used as national performance measurement platforms. In 2018, nearly 70 percent of the more than 50 specialty society registries in the United States were used by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to measure the quality of clinical care. Private payers and evaluating organizations also use or desire to use registry information to inform quality improvement programs and value-based payment models. The requirements for an entity to become a CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) constitute a minimum set of standards for the purpose of reporting to the CMS Quality Payment Program. Models and frameworks exist that can help classify registries by purpose and use, and maturity models are available for evaluating health IT systems generally. However, there is currently no framework that describes the capability that should be expected from a registry at different phases of its development and maturity. In response, the National Quality Registry Network (NQRN) has developed a registry maturational framework. The framework models early, intermediate and mature development phases, the capabilities anticipated during these phases and 17 domains across which registry programs support those capabilities. The framework was developed and refined by NQRN registry stewards, users and other stakeholders between 2013-2018. It is intended to be used as a developmental guide or for registry evaluation. The successful use of registry information to execute value-based payment models is a critical need in U.S. health care. The NQRN framework can help ensure that our national system of registries is rising to the occasion.

摘要

临床注册登记越来越多地被用作国家绩效评估平台。2018年,美国50多个专科协会注册登记机构中,近70%被医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)用于衡量临床护理质量。私人支付方和评估组织也使用或希望使用注册登记信息来为质量改进计划和基于价值的支付模式提供信息。一个实体要成为CMS合格临床数据注册登记机构(QCDR)的要求,构成了向CMS质量支付计划报告的最低标准集。现有一些模型和框架可帮助按目的和用途对注册登记机构进行分类,并且通常有成熟度模型可用于评估健康信息技术系统。然而,目前尚无一个框架来描述在注册登记机构发展和成熟的不同阶段应具备的能力。作为回应,国家质量注册登记网络(NQRN)制定了一个注册登记成熟度框架。该框架对早期、中期和成熟发展阶段进行了建模,预测了这些阶段预期的能力以及注册登记计划支持这些能力的17个领域。该框架由NQRN注册登记管理机构、用户和其他利益相关者在2013年至2018年期间制定和完善。它旨在用作发展指南或用于注册登记评估。成功利用注册登记信息来执行基于价值的支付模式是美国医疗保健领域的一项迫切需求。NQRN框架有助于确保我们国家的注册登记系统能够应对这一挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac82/6640257/83003044c20e/egems-7-1-278-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac82/6640257/cd0cf82f8fdf/egems-7-1-278-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac82/6640257/83003044c20e/egems-7-1-278-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac82/6640257/cd0cf82f8fdf/egems-7-1-278-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac82/6640257/83003044c20e/egems-7-1-278-g2.jpg

相似文献

1
The NQRN Registry Maturational Framework: Evaluating the Capability and Use of Clinical Registries.国家质量报告网络(NQRN)注册库成熟度框架:评估临床注册库的能力与应用
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Jul 17;7(1):29. doi: 10.5334/egems.278.
2
The present and future of quality measures and public reporting in neurosurgery.神经外科质量指标与公开报告的现状及未来
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E3. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.FOCUS15354.
3
The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database Qualified Clinical Data Registry: 2015 measure specifications and rationale.国家神经外科质量与结果数据库合格临床数据登记处:2015年指标规范及基本原理。
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E4. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.FOCUS15355.
4
The Use of Clinical Registries in the United States: A Landscape Survey.美国临床注册库的使用情况:一项全景调查。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Dec 7;5(1):26. doi: 10.5334/egems.248.
5
Development of a qualified clinical data registry for emergency medicine.开发一个合格的急诊医学临床数据登记系统。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Dec 21;2(6):e12547. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12547. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Qualified Clinical Data Registries: How Wound Care Practitioners Can Make the Most Out of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System.合格的临床数据登记处:伤口护理从业者如何充分利用基于绩效的激励支付系统。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2018 Nov 1;7(11):387-395. doi: 10.1089/wound.2018.0830. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
7
Measuring quality of urology care using a qualified clinical data registry.使用合格的临床数据登记处来衡量泌尿外科护理质量。
Curr Opin Urol. 2018 Jul;28(4):329-335. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000511.
8
Quality Outcomes Database Spine Care Project 2012-2020: milestones achieved in a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care and evolution to the American Spine Registry.2012 - 2020年质量结果数据库脊柱护理项目:北美协作性结果登记处取得的里程碑成果,以推进基于价值的脊柱护理并向美国脊柱登记处发展。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 May 1;48(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2020.2.FOCUS207.
9
Improving Interoperability between Registries and EHRs.提高注册登记系统与电子健康记录系统之间的互操作性。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2018 May 18;2017:20-25. eCollection 2018.
10
The American Society of Breast Surgeons and Quality Payment Programs: Ranking, Defining, and Benchmarking More Than 1 Million Patient Quality Measure Encounters.美国乳房外科医师学会与质量支付计划:对超过 100 万患者质量测量结果进行排名、定义和基准测试。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(10):3093-3106. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5940-1. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoping review of the recommendations and guidance for improving the quality of rare disease registries.罕见病登记处质量改进建议和指南的范围综述。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 May 6;19(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03193-y.
2
Hip fracture registries in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.中低收入国家的髋部骨折登记处:范围综述。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Apr 17;18(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01241-x.
3
Classifying outcomes in secondary and tertiary care clinical quality registries-an organizational case study with the COMET taxonomy.

本文引用的文献

1
The Use of Clinical Registries in the United States: A Landscape Survey.美国临床注册库的使用情况:一项全景调查。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Dec 7;5(1):26. doi: 10.5334/egems.248.
2
Improving Interoperability between Registries and EHRs.提高注册登记系统与电子健康记录系统之间的互操作性。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2018 May 18;2017:20-25. eCollection 2018.
3
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
二级和三级保健临床质量登记处的结局分类——采用 COMET 分类学的组织案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08132-w.
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
4
Building a learning health system using clinical registers: a non-technical introduction.利用临床登记册构建学习型健康系统:非技术性介绍。
J Health Organ Manag. 2016 Oct 10;30(7):1105-1118. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2016-0110.
5
Development, Implementation, and Use of a Local and Global Clinical Registry for Neurosurgery.开发、实施和使用神经外科的本地和全球临床注册中心。
Big Data. 2015 Jun;3(2):80-9. doi: 10.1089/big.2014.0069.
6
ACC/AHA/STS Statement on the Future of Registries and the Performance Measurement Enterprise: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/胸外科医师协会关于注册登记与绩效评估事业未来的声明:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会绩效评估特别工作组及胸外科医师协会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Nov 17;66(20):2230-2245. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
7
Transcatheter valve therapy registry is a model for medical device innovation and surveillance.经导管瓣膜治疗注册是医疗器械创新和监测的一种模式。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Feb;34(2):328-34. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1010.
8
A framework for creating standardized outcome measures for patient registries.用于为患者登记处创建标准化结果测量指标的框架。
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Sep;3(5):473-80. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.38.
9
Creating value in health care through big data: opportunities and policy implications.通过大数据在医疗保健领域创造价值:机遇与政策启示
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul;33(7):1115-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0147.
10
Leveraging effective clinical registries to advance medical care quality and transparency.利用有效的临床登记系统提高医疗质量和透明度。
Popul Health Manag. 2014 Apr;17(2):127-33. doi: 10.1089/pop.2013.0021. Epub 2013 Oct 23.