• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Qualified Clinical Data Registries: How Wound Care Practitioners Can Make the Most Out of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System.合格的临床数据登记处:伤口护理从业者如何充分利用基于绩效的激励支付系统。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2018 Nov 1;7(11):387-395. doi: 10.1089/wound.2018.0830. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
2
The Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Registry: Driving quality and demonstrating compliance.高压氧治疗登记处:推动质量并证明合规性。
Undersea Hyperb Med. 2018 Jan-Feb;45(1):1-8.
3
The present and future of quality measures and public reporting in neurosurgery.神经外科质量指标与公开报告的现状及未来
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E3. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.FOCUS15354.
4
Emergency clinician participation and performance in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System.紧急临床医生在医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心基于绩效的奖励支付系统中的参与和表现。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;29(1):64-72. doi: 10.1111/acem.14373. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
5
Publicly Reported Wound Healing Rates: The Fantasy and the Reality.公开报告的伤口愈合率:幻想与现实。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2018 Mar 1;7(3):77-94. doi: 10.1089/wound.2017.0743.
6
MACRA, MIPS, and the New Medicare Quality Payment Program: An Update for Radiologists.《医疗保险获取与责任法案》(MACRA)、医师质量报告系统(MIPS)与新的医疗保险质量支付计划:放射科医生最新情况
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Mar;14(3):316-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
7
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Harsh Choices For Interventional Pain Management Physicians.基于绩效的激励支付系统(MIPS):介入性疼痛管理医生面临的艰难抉择
Pain Physician. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(7):E917-34.
8
The Quality Measure Crunch: How CMS Topped Out Scoring and Removal Policies Disproportionately Disadvantage Radiologists.质量衡量困境:CMS 的评分和剔除政策如何不成比例地使放射科医生处于不利地位。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jan;17(1 Pt B):110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.08.014.
9
The 2018 Merit-based Incentive Payment System: Participation, Performance, and Payment Across Specialties.2018 年基于绩效的激励支付系统:各专业的参与、绩效和支付。
Med Care. 2022 Feb 1;60(2):156-163. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001674.
10
The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database Qualified Clinical Data Registry: 2015 measure specifications and rationale.国家神经外科质量与结果数据库合格临床数据登记处:2015年指标规范及基本原理。
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E4. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.FOCUS15355.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the DHIS2 platform for integrating sociomedical data to study wound care outcomes.用于整合社会医学数据以研究伤口护理结果的DHIS2平台的开发与验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 4;19(12):e0308553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308553. eCollection 2024.
2
Prevalence and incidence of venous leg ulcers-a protocol for a systematic review.下肢静脉溃疡的患病率和发病率——一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2021 May 12;10(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01697-3.
3
Outcomes in patients with chronic leg wounds in Denmark: A nationwide register-based cohort study.丹麦慢性腿部伤口患者的结局:一项全国范围内基于登记的队列研究。
Int Wound J. 2022 Jan;19(1):156-168. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13607. Epub 2021 May 3.
4
The Wound Healing Index for Predicting Venous Leg Ulcer Outcome.伤口愈合指数预测静脉溃疡结局。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2020 Feb 1;9(2):68-77. doi: 10.1089/wound.2019.1038. Epub 2019 Dec 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Publicly Reported Wound Healing Rates: The Fantasy and the Reality.公开报告的伤口愈合率:幻想与现实。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2018 Mar 1;7(3):77-94. doi: 10.1089/wound.2017.0743.
2
The Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Registry: Driving quality and demonstrating compliance.高压氧治疗登记处:推动质量并证明合规性。
Undersea Hyperb Med. 2018 Jan-Feb;45(1):1-8.
3
An Economic Evaluation of the Impact, Cost, and Medicare Policy Implications of Chronic Nonhealing Wounds.慢性难愈合伤口的影响、成本及医疗保险政策影响的经济评估
Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
4
Rapid analysis of hyperbaric oxygen therapy registry data for reimbursement purposes: Technical communication.
Undersea Hyperb Med. 2016 Sept-Oct;43(6):633-639.
5
A new approach to clinical research: Integrating clinical care, quality reporting, and research using a wound care network-based learning healthcare system.临床研究的一种新方法:利用基于伤口护理网络的学习型医疗系统整合临床护理、质量报告和研究。
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 May;25(3):354-365. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12538. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
6
Harnessing electronic healthcare data for wound care research: Standards for reporting observational registry data obtained directly from electronic health records.利用电子医疗数据进行伤口护理研究:直接从电子健康记录中获取的观察性注册数据报告标准。
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Apr;25(2):192-209. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12523. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
7
Impact of the HITECH Act on physicians' adoption of electronic health records.《健康信息技术经济与临床健康法案》对医生采用电子健康记录的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):375-9. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv103. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
8
Electronic Health Records, Registries, and Quality Measures: What? Why? How?电子健康记录、注册登记系统与质量指标:是什么?为什么?怎么做?
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2013 Dec;2(10):598-604. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0476.
9
Development of a wound healing index for patients with chronic wounds.慢性伤口患者的伤口愈合指数的制定。
Wound Repair Regen. 2013 Nov-Dec;21(6):823-32. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12107. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
10
Congressional intent for the HITECH Act.《健康信息技术促进经济和临床健康法案》的国会意图。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Dec;16(12 Suppl HIT):SP24-8.

合格的临床数据登记处:伤口护理从业者如何充分利用基于绩效的激励支付系统。

Qualified Clinical Data Registries: How Wound Care Practitioners Can Make the Most Out of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System.

作者信息

Fife Caroline E, Walker David, Eckert Kristen A

机构信息

U.S. Wound Registry, The Woodlands, Texas.

Strategic Solutions, Inc., Cody, Wyoming.

出版信息

Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2018 Nov 1;7(11):387-395. doi: 10.1089/wound.2018.0830. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1089/wound.2018.0830
PMID:31832269
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6906748/
Abstract

Wound care practitioners have no professional society to promote participation in a Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR), which is essential to thrive under the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), and until recently have lacked relevant quality measures to report. Practitioners can now participate in the nonprofit U.S. Wound Registry (USWR) QCDR for MIPS credit, which can receive data from any certified electronic health record (EHR) and, in so doing, generate data useful for comparative effectiveness research. For 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has approved 12 wound care and hyperbaric medicine-relevant quality measures and several clinical practice Improvement Activities, which can be reported for MIPS credit through the USWR. Several QCDR measures have met the CMS 3-year reporting criteria to establish national benchmark rates, likely enabling practitioners to achieve higher quality scores than possible with standard MIPS measures. The structured registry data generated have been harnessed to evaluate adherence to evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, understand real-world patient healing rates, and demonstrate the comparative effectiveness of wound therapies. Wound care practitioners can participate in a QCDR for MIPS credit, which enables them to optimize their MIPS score, particularly if they transmit data directly from their EHR. Utilizing structured data for comparative effectiveness research may help ensure patient access to advanced therapeutics. By 2019, to overcome technological barriers to participation, USWR quality measures will be available as "apps" for EHRs that support the interface required to achieve the next stage of EHR certification as part of the open Application Programming Initiative.

摘要

伤口护理从业者没有专业协会来推动他们参与合格临床数据登记系统(QCDR),而这对于在基于绩效的激励支付系统(MIPS)下蓬勃发展至关重要,并且直到最近,他们一直缺乏相关的质量指标来报告。从业者现在可以参与非营利性的美国伤口登记处(USWR)的QCDR以获得MIPS积分,该登记处可以从任何经过认证的电子健康记录(EHR)接收数据,并在此过程中生成对比较效果研究有用的数据。2018年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)批准了12项与伤口护理和高压氧医学相关的质量指标以及多项临床实践改进活动,这些都可以通过USWR报告以获得MIPS积分。一些QCDR指标已经满足了CMS的三年报告标准,从而能够确立全国基准率,这可能使从业者获得比使用标准MIPS指标时更高的质量得分。所生成的结构化登记数据已被用于评估对循证临床实践指南的遵循情况、了解现实世界中患者的愈合率,并证明伤口治疗的比较效果。伤口护理从业者可以参与QCDR以获得MIPS积分,这使他们能够优化自己的MIPS得分,特别是如果他们直接从电子健康记录传输数据的话。利用结构化数据进行比较效果研究可能有助于确保患者能够获得先进的治疗方法。到2019年,为了克服参与的技术障碍,USWR的质量指标将作为电子健康记录的“应用程序”提供,这些电子健康记录支持作为开放应用程序编程计划一部分实现下一阶段电子健康记录认证所需的接口。