Kaiser Permanente Washington Heath Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):2075-2082. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05136-x. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
Routine population-based screening for depression is an essential part of evolving health care models integrating care for mental health in primary care. Depression instruments often include questions about suicidal thoughts, but how patients experience these questions in primary care is not known and may have implications for accurate identification of patients at risk.
To explore the patient experience of routine population-based depression screening/assessment followed, for some, by suicide risk assessment and discussions with providers.
Qualitative, interview-based study.
Thirty-seven patients from Kaiser Permanente Washington who had recently screened positive for depression on the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ] and completed the full PHQ-9.
Criterion sampling identified patients who had recently completed the PHQ-9 ninth question which asks about the frequency of thoughts about self-harm. Patients completed semi-structured interviews by phone, which were recorded and transcribed. Directive and conventional content analyses were used to apply knowledge from prior research and elucidate new information from interviews; thematic analysis was used to organize key content overall and across groups based on endorsement of suicide ideation.
Four main organizing themes emerged from analyses: (1) Participants believed being asked about suicidality was contextually appropriate and valuable, (2) some participants described a mismatch between their lived experience and the PHQ-9 ninth question, (3) suicidality disclosures involved weighing hope for help against fears of negative consequences, and (4) provider relationships and acts of listening and caring facilitated discussions about suicidality.
All participants believed being asked questions about suicidal thoughts was appropriate, though some who disclosed suicidal thoughts described experiencing stigma and sometimes distanced themselves from suicidality. Direct communication with trusted providers, who listened and expressed empathy, bolstered comfort with disclosure. Future research should consider strategies for reducing stigma and encouraging fearless disclosure among primary care patients experiencing suicidality.
常规的基于人群的抑郁筛查是将精神卫生保健纳入初级保健的不断发展的医疗保健模式的重要组成部分。抑郁量表通常包括有关自杀念头的问题,但患者在初级保健中对这些问题的体验尚不清楚,这可能对准确识别有风险的患者产生影响。
探讨常规人群抑郁筛查/评估的患者体验,随后对某些患者进行自杀风险评估,并与提供者进行讨论。
基于访谈的定性研究。
来自 Kaiser Permanente Washington 的 37 名患者,他们最近在 PHQ-2 项患者健康问卷上筛查出抑郁阳性,并完成了完整的 PHQ-9。
基于标准的抽样确定了最近完成 PHQ-9 第九个问题的患者,该问题询问自我伤害想法的频率。患者通过电话完成半结构化访谈,访谈内容被记录并转录。采用指令性和传统的内容分析方法,运用先前研究的知识并从访谈中阐明新信息;主题分析用于根据自杀意念的认可情况,对整体和跨组的关键内容进行组织。
分析得出了四个主要的组织主题:(1)参与者认为被问及自杀意念是有上下文关联且有价值的,(2)一些参与者描述了他们的生活经历与 PHQ-9 第九个问题之间的不匹配,(3)自杀意念的披露涉及权衡寻求帮助的希望与对负面后果的恐惧,(4)提供者关系以及倾听和关心的行为促进了有关自杀意念的讨论。
所有参与者都认为询问自杀念头的问题是合适的,尽管一些披露自杀念头的参与者描述了经历污名化,有时会使自己与自杀意念保持距离。与值得信赖的提供者进行直接沟通,他们倾听并表达同理心,会增强披露的舒适度。未来的研究应考虑减少污名化和鼓励有自杀意念的初级保健患者大胆披露的策略。