• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《医学生医学职业精神感知评估工具简体中文版的编制与验证》

Development and Validation of a Simplified Chinese Version of the Assessment Tool for Students' Perceptions of Medical Professionalism.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

Department of Clinical Data Center, the 3rd Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

出版信息

Curr Med Sci. 2019 Aug;39(4):670-678. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2090-7. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11596-019-2090-7
PMID:31347007
Abstract

Professionalism is crucial in all professions and is particularly important in the medical field. Measuring students' perceptions of professionalism can help to form education targeting the enhancement of professionalism. This study aimed to validate an effective assessment tool for the measurement of medical students' perceptions of medical professionalism in mainland China. The cross-sectional survey was conducted in three medical colleges in Guangdong, China. Of the 2103 eligible medical students, 1976 responded, and 1856 questionnaires were deemed valid. Students from clinical medicine in these three medical colleges were randomly selected by cluster sampling. First, a Simplified Chinese Version questionnaire to measure Student's Perception of Medical Professionalism (SCV-SPMP) was constructed. Second, questionnaires from 1856 students majoring in clinical medicine at three medical colleges were included in the analysis. Third, exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, item-subscale correlation, and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to test the validity and reliability of the SCV-SPMP. Nine items were eliminated following exploratory factor analysis, and four subscales were extracted from the analysis. All internal consistency reliability exceeded the minimum standard. The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.94, and four subscales' alphas were 0.82 (Accountability and excellence), 0.81 (Duty), 0.89 (Honor and integrity), and 0.85 (Practice habits and respect for others), respectively. The model fit was good. The convergent validity and discriminant validity were acceptable. The modified SCV-SPMP was found to be a valid and reliable tool to capture the main features of Chinese students' perceptions of medical professionalism in four dimensions, and it provides a quantitative method for the measurement of the students' perceptions in mainland China..

摘要

专业性在所有职业中都至关重要,尤其在医疗领域更是如此。衡量学生对专业性的看法有助于制定针对提高专业性的教育目标。本研究旨在验证一种有效的评估工具,用于测量中国大陆医学生对医学专业性的看法。该横断面调查在中国广东的三所医学院进行。在 2103 名符合条件的医学生中,有 1976 名学生做出了回应,其中 1856 份问卷被认为是有效的。这三所医学院的临床医学专业学生采用整群抽样的方法随机抽取。首先,构建了用于测量医学生专业性看法的简体中文版本问卷(SCV-SPMP)。其次,对三所医学院的 1856 名临床医学专业学生的问卷进行分析。然后,进行探索性因子分析、克朗巴赫α系数、项目-分量表相关性以及验证性因子分析,以检验 SCV-SPMP 的有效性和可靠性。经过探索性因子分析,删除了 9 个项目,从分析中提取了 4 个分量表。所有内部一致性信度均超过最低标准。总量表克朗巴赫α系数为 0.94,4 个分量表的α系数分别为 0.82(问责制和卓越)、0.81(责任)、0.89(荣誉和正直)和 0.85(实践习惯和尊重他人)。模型拟合度良好。收敛有效性和判别有效性可接受。改良后的 SCV-SPMP 是一种有效且可靠的工具,可捕捉中国学生对医学专业性看法的四个维度的主要特征,为中国大陆学生的看法提供了一种定量测量方法。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Simplified Chinese Version of the Assessment Tool for Students' Perceptions of Medical Professionalism.《医学生医学职业精神感知评估工具简体中文版的编制与验证》
Curr Med Sci. 2019 Aug;39(4):670-678. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2090-7. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
2
Assessing professional behaviors: a self-administered scale for medical students during clerkships.评估专业行为:医学生实习期间的自评量表。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):692. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05676-9.
3
Development of an instrument to measure medical students' perceptions of the assessment environment: initial validation.一种用于测量医学生对评估环境认知的工具的开发:初步验证
Med Educ Online. 2015 Oct 27;20:28612. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28612. eCollection 2015.
4
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
5
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
6
Student's Inventory of Professionalism (SIP): A Tool to Assess Attitudes towards Professional Development Based on Palliative Care Undergraduate Education.学生职业操守评估表(SIP):基于姑息治疗本科教育的职业发展态度评估工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 5;16(24):4925. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244925.
7
Chinese version of the nursing students' perception of instructor caring (C-NSPIC): assessment of reliability and validity.护生对教师关怀感知量表中文版(C-NSPIC):信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Dec;33(12):1482-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.017. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
8
The reliability and validity of a new professionalism assessment scale for young health care workers.一种针对年轻医护人员的新型职业素养评估量表的信效度研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(25):e7058. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007058.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Snizek-revised Hall's Professionalism Inventory Scale.斯尼泽克修订版霍尔职业素养量表中文版的心理测量学评估
J Int Med Res. 2019 Mar;47(3):1154-1168. doi: 10.1177/0300060518817401. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
10
Validity and reliability of the Professionalism Assessment Scale in Turkish medical students.土耳其医学生职业评估量表的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0281000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281000. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Lost in 'Culturation': medical informed consent in China (from a Western perspective).迷失在“文化适应”中:中国的医疗知情同意(从西方视角看)
Med Health Care Philos. 2019 Mar;22(1):17-30. doi: 10.1007/s11019-018-9835-0.
2
Professionalism among paramedic students: achieving the measure or missing the mark?护理专业学生的职业素养:达到标准还是未达要求?
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Oct 20;8:711-719. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S137455. eCollection 2017.
3
Welfare, wellness, and job satisfaction of Chinese physicians: A national survey of public tertiary hospitals in China.
中国医生的福利、健康状况与工作满意度:对中国公立三级医院的全国性调查
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Jul;32(3):270-284. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2420. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
4
The reliability and validity of a new professionalism assessment scale for young health care workers.一种针对年轻医护人员的新型职业素养评估量表的信效度研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(25):e7058. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007058.
5
Development an instrument assessing residents' attitude towards professionalism lapses in training.开发一种评估住院医师对培训中职业精神失误态度的工具。 不过你提供的原文有错误,正确的应该是“Develop an instrument assessing residents' attitude towards professionalism lapses in training.”
Korean J Med Educ. 2017 Jun;29(2):81-91. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2017.55. Epub 2017 May 29.
6
Seroprevalence of Cysticercus Antibodies in Japanese Encephalitis Patients in Upper Assam, India: A Hospital Based Study.印度上阿萨姆邦日本脑炎患者中囊尾蚴抗体的血清流行率:一项基于医院的研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):DC21-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18260.7795. Epub 2016 May 1.
7
Perception of medical professionalism among the surgical community in the University of Nairobi: a mixed method study.内罗毕大学外科界对医学职业精神的认知:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Apr 1;16:101. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0622-4.
8
Development of the Chinese version of the Hospital Autonomy Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study in Guangdong Province.《医院自主性问卷中文版的编制:广东省的一项横断面研究》
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 24;6(2):e010504. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010504.
9
The Medical Professionalism of Korean Physicians: Present and Future.韩国医生的职业精神:现状与未来。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Aug 26;16:56. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0051-7.
10
Governance and professionalism in medicine: a UK perspective.医学中的治理与专业精神:英国视角
JAMA. 2015 May 12;313(18):1823-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3187.