Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Northumbria University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Qual Health Res. 2020 Jan;30(2):217-227. doi: 10.1177/1049732319863420. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
Drawing on work that aimed to understand factors influencing experience of and engagement with the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check Program, this article discusses how Normalization Process Theory was used throughout the life course of a research project. As a relatively new theory, Normalization Process Theory is still being refined and much work undertaken to develop interactive tools and "test" the utility of it. Although there is little published critique of the theory, two main issues have arisen in the literature: (a) difficulties ensuring interpretation of constructs are congruent to the original theory and (b) the intensity of translation work to contextualize the theory to individual settings. These issues are explored in this article by examining the processes undertaken to translate Normalization Process Theory so that it was usable to shape a qualitative research project from design to analysis and interpretation.
本文借鉴了旨在了解影响国民保健制度(NHS)健康检查计划体验和参与因素的工作,讨论了规范进程理论在研究项目整个生命周期中的应用。作为一种相对较新的理论,规范进程理论仍在不断完善和大量工作正在进行,以开发互动工具并“测试”其效用。尽管对该理论的批评很少见,但文献中出现了两个主要问题:(a)难以确保对构建的解释与原始理论一致;(b)将理论转化为特定环境的翻译工作强度。本文通过检查将规范进程理论进行翻译的过程,以使其可用于从设计到分析和解释来塑造定性研究项目,探讨了这些问题。