Nordin Håkan M A, Mathisen Gro Ellen, Rørtveit Kristine, Joa Inge, Johannessen Jan O, Ruud Torleif, Hartveit Miriam
Department of Psychiatry, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Department of Caring and Ethics, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Feb 29;16:93-104. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S430285. eCollection 2024.
Despite the large amount of leadership and implementation theories and recommendations, healthcare services continue to struggle with efficiently incorporating new knowledge. The questioning of conventional leadership approaches in healthcare organizations prompted us to investigate how frontline leaders comprehend their own implementation intentions and actions, and how these intentions and actions may impact the implementation of clinical guidelines in mental healthcare in Norway.
Employing a theory-driven qualitative design, we conducted nine semi-structured interviews with frontline leaders who had recently led implementation of clinical guidelines for the treatment of psychosis in mental health. We employed Systematic Text Condensation, informed by Normalization Process Theory, to structure and analyze the data and used fidelity scales to measure the degree of implementation and distinguish between leaders' levels of success in implementation.
Frontline leaders in units that achieved high success in implementation described their intentions and actions differently, from those with less success. The former group's actions aligned more closely with the constructs of the Normalization Process Theory compared to the latter group when describing their actions. Frontline leaders leading units with a high degree of implementation success describe relation-orientation, trust, and providing adaptive space for staff members to take initiative. In contrast, those leading units with less implementation success describe more control and guidance of co-operators and place more emphasize on information and knowledge.
Differences in how frontline leaders describe their actions and intentions to achieve clinical guideline implementation suggest that the leadership approach of these frontline leaders is an important factor to consider when planning and conducting implementation. To better understand the implementation process, it is important to pay attention to how frontline leaders customize their leadership approaches to the dynamics of complex organizations, and how they interact with their team and superiors.
尽管有大量的领导力和实施理论及建议,但医疗服务在有效整合新知识方面仍面临困难。对医疗组织中传统领导方法的质疑促使我们研究一线领导者如何理解他们自己的实施意图和行动,以及这些意图和行动如何影响挪威精神卫生领域临床指南的实施。
采用理论驱动的定性设计,我们对最近领导了精神卫生领域精神病治疗临床指南实施工作的一线领导者进行了九次半结构化访谈。我们运用基于规范化过程理论的系统文本浓缩法来构建和分析数据,并使用保真度量表来衡量实施程度,区分领导者在实施中的成功水平。
在实施方面取得高度成功的单位中的一线领导者与那些不太成功的领导者对他们的意图和行动的描述有所不同。在描述他们的行动时,与后者相比,前者的行动更符合规范化过程理论的构建。领导实施成功程度高的单位的一线领导者描述了关系导向、信任以及为工作人员主动采取行动提供适应性空间。相比之下,那些领导实施不太成功的单位的领导者描述了对合作者更多的控制和指导,并更强调信息和知识。
一线领导者在描述他们为实现临床指南实施而采取的行动和意图方面的差异表明,在规划和进行实施时,这些一线领导者的领导方法是一个需要考虑的重要因素。为了更好地理解实施过程, 重要的是要关注一线领导者如何根据复杂组织的动态调整他们的领导方法,以及他们如何与团队和上级互动。