Suppr超能文献

三种提示系统教授关系技能的随机临床试验

A randomized clinical trial of three prompting systems to teach tact relations.

机构信息

Autism Partnership Foundation and Endicott College.

Autism Partnership Foundation.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Apr;53(2):727-743. doi: 10.1002/jaba.617. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

Abstract

Prompts are commonly used during discrete trial teaching for individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Three commonly used prompting systems include constant time delay, most-to-least prompting, and flexible prompt fading. Most of the research demonstrating the effectiveness of these three prompting strategies have been completed through the use of single subject experimental designs. Some within the field of behaviorally based approaches to ASD interventions have called for more randomized clinical trials of these approaches. The purpose of the present study was to compare these 3 prompting systems to teach tact relations for 27 individuals diagnosed with ASD through a randomized clinical trial without a control group with respect to pre-post responding, generalization, sessions to mastery, and responding during teaching. Overall, minimal differences were observed across the 3 systems. The results are discussed with respect to future research and clinical application of the methods evaluated.

摘要

在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体的离散试验教学中,通常会使用提示。三种常用的提示系统包括固定时间延迟、从多到少提示和灵活提示消退。证明这三种提示策略有效性的大部分研究都是通过使用单一被试实验设计完成的。ASD 干预行为方法领域的一些人呼吁对这些方法进行更多的随机临床试验。本研究的目的是通过随机临床试验(不设对照组),比较这 3 种提示系统在 27 名被诊断为 ASD 的个体中教授动作关系,以在教学前后的反应、泛化、掌握阶段的课程和教学中的反应方面进行比较。总体而言,在这三种系统中观察到的差异很小。结果将根据所评估方法的未来研究和临床应用进行讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验