• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价在一体化医疗体系中由药剂师管理的抗糖尿病药物停用方案。

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Antidiabetic Deprescribing Program in an Integrated Health Care System.

机构信息

1Pharmacy Outcomes Research Group.

3Clinical Pharmacy Services, Kaiser Permanente Northern California Region, Oakland.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Aug;25(8):927-934. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.8.927.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.8.927
PMID:31347983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398140/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the elderly, use of medications may increase the propensity for adverse drug events due to alterations in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles from normal aging processes. Deprescribing is the planned and supervised process of dose reduction or discontinuation of medications that may lead to harm or are no longer beneficial. While there are studies detailing strategies to deprescribe medications such as benzodiazepines and antipsychotics in nursing homes or for patients with dementia, there is a lack of guidance to safely deprescribe chronic medications, such as antidiabetics, for older patients in the community setting.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of hypoglycemia and other outcomes of pharmacist-managed deprescribing on selected antidiabetic medications under the guidance of a standardized program compared with usual care within an integrated health care system.

METHODS

This was a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study. The pharmacist-managed deprescribing group included patients who were enrolled in the deprescribing program between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017. The usual care group included eligible patients who did not receive the deprescribing intervention and were matched to the deprescribing group using propensity score matching (PSM). Baseline demographics and clinical variables were used for matching. Patients were followed for 6 months or the end of membership or death, whichever occurred first. Primary outcome was the risk of hypoglycemia. Secondary outcomes included risk of hyperglycemia, proportion of patients at goal (A1c), change in A1c, change in monthly antidiabetic drug cost, and all-cause mortality. Outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariant regression or Cox proportional hazard models when appropriate.

RESULTS

After PSM, 685 patients in the deprescribing group and 2,055 patients in the usual care group were similar in age, gender, weight, and comorbidity burden (mean [SD] age 82.4 [5.4] years, 48% female, mean [SD] weight 81.7 [19.2] kg, mean [SD] Charlson Comorbidity Index score 3.2 [1.6]). Compared with the usual care group, the deprescribing group had a lower risk of hypoglycemia (1.5% vs. 3.1%, < 0.02; adjusted odds ratio 0.42, < 0.01). As for the secondary outcomes, the deprescribing group had a greater change (SD) in A1c (0.3 [0.6] vs. 0.2 [0.7] < 0.01) and lower all-cause mortality (2.3% vs 5.6%, < 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio 0.35, < 0.01). There were no differences observed in the risk of hyperglycemia, proportion of patients at goal A1c < 7%, and change in monthly antidiabetic drug costs between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There are currently no studies to our knowledge that evaluate the outcomes of a pharmacist-managed deprescribing program targeting antidiabetic medications. The results of our study showed that deprescribing of selected antidiabetics reduced the risk of hypoglycemia and may have mortality benefit in elderly patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes, who are taking medications that can cause hypoglycemia. Further and longer studies are needed to validate these benefits.

DISCLOSURES

No outside funding was provided to support this research study. The authors of this study have no actual or potential conflicts of interest to report. Parts of this study were presented in a nonreviewed resident poster at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting; April 23-26, 2018; Boston, MA.

摘要

背景

在老年人中,由于正常衰老过程中药物代谢动力学和药效学特征的改变,药物的使用可能会增加发生不良药物事件的倾向。减少药物剂量或停止使用可能会导致伤害或不再有益的药物是有计划和监督的过程,称为药物精简。虽然有研究详细介绍了在养老院或痴呆患者中减少苯二氮䓬类药物和抗精神病药物等药物的策略,但缺乏在社区环境中为老年患者安全减少慢性病药物(如糖尿病药物)的指导。

目的

评估在综合医疗保健系统中,在标准化计划的指导下,由药剂师管理的药物精简方案与常规护理相比,对选定的糖尿病药物的低血糖风险和其他结果的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。药剂师管理的药物精简组包括 2016 年 7 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 30 日期间参加药物精简计划的患者。常规护理组包括符合条件但未接受药物精简干预的患者,并使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)与药物精简组进行匹配。使用基线人口统计学和临床变量进行匹配。患者在 6 个月或会员资格结束或死亡时(以先发生者为准)进行随访。主要结局是低血糖风险。次要结局包括高血糖风险、达到目标 A1c 的患者比例(A1c)、A1c 变化、每月糖尿病药物费用变化和全因死亡率。使用描述性统计和多变量回归或 Cox 比例风险模型分析结局,必要时进行分析。

结果

在 PSM 后,药物精简组的 685 名患者和常规护理组的 2055 名患者在年龄、性别、体重和合并症负担方面相似(平均[SD]年龄 82.4[5.4]岁,48%女性,平均[SD]体重 81.7[19.2]kg,平均[SD]Charlson 合并症指数评分 3.2[1.6])。与常规护理组相比,药物精简组低血糖风险较低(1.5%比 3.1%,<0.02;调整后的优势比 0.42,<0.01)。至于次要结局,药物精简组的 A1c 变化(0.3[0.6]比 0.2[0.7],<0.01)更大,全因死亡率较低(2.3%比 5.6%,<0.01;调整后的风险比 0.35,<0.01)。两组间高血糖风险、达到目标 A1c<7%的患者比例和每月糖尿病药物费用变化无差异。

结论

据我们所知,目前没有研究评估针对糖尿病药物的药剂师管理药物精简方案的结局。我们的研究结果表明,减少选定的糖尿病药物可以降低低血糖风险,并可能在血糖控制良好的 2 型糖尿病老年患者中具有降低死亡率的益处,这些患者正在服用可能导致低血糖的药物。需要进一步和更长时间的研究来验证这些益处。

披露

本研究没有外部资金支持。本研究的作者没有实际或潜在的利益冲突需要报告。本研究的部分内容以未经评审的居民海报形式在管理式医疗药房管理式护理和专科药房年会(2018 年 4 月 23 日至 26 日,马萨诸塞州波士顿)上进行了介绍。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Antidiabetic Deprescribing Program in an Integrated Health Care System.评价在一体化医疗体系中由药剂师管理的抗糖尿病药物停用方案。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Aug;25(8):927-934. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.8.927.
2
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Deprescribing Program in an Integrated Health Care System.评估在一体化医疗保健系统中实施的药师管理非甾体抗炎药停药计划。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jul;26(7):918-924. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.7.918.
3
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Program in a Primary Care Setting Within an Integrated Health Care System.在综合性医疗保健系统中,评估初级保健环境下药师管理的糖尿病项目。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):114-122. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.114.
4
Estimated Cost-Effectiveness, Cost Benefit, and Risk Reduction Associated with an Endocrinologist-Pharmacist Diabetes Intense Medical Management "Tune-Up" Clinic.估算与内分泌专家-药剂师糖尿病强化医疗管理“调整”诊所相关的成本效益、成本效益和风险降低。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):318-326. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3.318.
5
Evaluation of Outcomes After Initiating Triple Antidiabetic Therapy with a GLP-1 RA in an Integrated Health Care System.在综合医疗体系中使用 GLP-1RA 启动三联抗糖尿病治疗后的结果评估。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Mar;25(3):350-356. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.3.350.
6
Impact of a clinical pharmacy program on changes in hemoglobin A1c, diabetes-related hospitalizations, and diabetes-related emergency department visits for patients with diabetes in an underserved population.在服务不足人群中,临床药学项目对糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白变化、糖尿病相关住院和糖尿病相关急诊就诊的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Sep;20(9):914-9. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.9.914.
7
Evaluation of an outpatient pharmacy clinical services program on adherence and clinical outcomes among patients with diabetes and/or coronary artery disease.评估门诊药房临床服务项目对糖尿病和/或冠状动脉疾病患者依从性及临床结局的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Oct;20(10):1036-45. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.10.1036.
8
Analysis of Glycemic Control of a Pharmacist-Led Medication Management Program in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病患者中由药剂师主导的药物管理项目的血糖控制分析
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jan;22(1):32-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.32.
9
Demographic and Clinical Profiles of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Initiating Canagliflozin Versus DPP-4 Inhibitors in a Large U.S. Managed Care Population.在一个大型美国管理式医疗人群中,起始用卡格列净与 DPP-4 抑制剂治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的人口统计学和临床特征。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Dec;21(12):1204-12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.12.1204.
10
Factors Associated with Diabetes-Related Clinical Inertia in a Managed Care Population and Its Effect on Hemoglobin A1c Goal Attainment: A Claims-Based Analysis.基于理赔数据分析的管理式医疗人群中与糖尿病相关临床惰性及其对糖化血红蛋白达标影响的相关因素
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Mar;25(3):304-313. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.3.304.

引用本文的文献

1
Lifestyle Interventions for Treatment and Remission of Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes in Adults: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Lifestyle Medicine.成人2型糖尿病和糖尿病前期治疗与缓解的生活方式干预:美国生活方式医学学院临床实践指南
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2025 Jun 10;19(2 Suppl):10S-131S. doi: 10.1177/15598276251325488. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Pharmacist-led deprescribing of cardiovascular and diabetes medication within a clinical medication review: the LeMON study (Less Medicines in Older Patients in the Netherlands), a cluster randomized controlled trial.在临床药物审查中由药剂师主导的心血管和糖尿病药物减药:LeMON研究(荷兰老年患者更少用药研究),一项整群随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jan 23. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01863-w.
3
Deprescribing in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Associations With Patients' Perspectives: The Diabetes and Aging Study.老年2型糖尿病患者的减药治疗:与患者观点的关联:糖尿病与衰老研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Apr;73(4):1155-1167. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19352. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
4
The role of pharmacists in deprescribing benzodiazepines: A scoping review.药剂师在停用苯二氮䓬类药物中的作用:一项范围综述
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Sep 2;12:100328. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100328. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Programs: Improving Treatment Adherence and Patient Outcomes.药剂师管理的糖尿病项目:提高治疗依从性及改善患者预后
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022 Jun 20;15:1911-1923. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S342936. eCollection 2022.
6
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Deprescribing Program in an Integrated Health Care System.评估在一体化医疗保健系统中实施的药师管理非甾体抗炎药停药计划。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jul;26(7):918-924. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.7.918.
7
Understanding the rise of cardiometabolic diseases in low- and middle-income countries.了解中低收入国家中心血管代谢疾病的兴起。
Nat Med. 2019 Nov;25(11):1667-1679. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0644-7. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Deprescribing antihyperglycemic agents in older persons: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline.老年人停用抗高血糖药物:基于证据的临床实践指南。
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Nov;63(11):832-843.
2
Clinical Outcomes Associated with Medication Regimen Complexity in Older People: A Systematic Review.老年人药物治疗方案复杂性与临床结局的关联:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Apr;65(4):747-753. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14682. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
3
Lack of Evidence to Guide Deprescribing of Antihyperglycemics: A Systematic Review.缺乏指导停用降糖药的证据:一项系统评价
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Feb;8(1):23-31. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0220-9. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
4
11. Older Adults.11. 老年人。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(Suppl 1):S99-S104. doi: 10.2337/dc17-S014.
5
Reducing Adverse Drug Events: The Need to Rethink Outpatient Prescribing.减少药物不良事件:重新思考门诊处方的必要性。
JAMA. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2092-2093. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16392.
6
Methodology for Developing Deprescribing Guidelines: Using Evidence and GRADE to Guide Recommendations for Deprescribing.制定减药指南的方法:利用证据和GRADE指导减药建议
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 12;11(8):e0161248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161248. eCollection 2016.
7
Deprescribing in older people.老年人的减药方案
Maturitas. 2016 Sep;91:115-34. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
8
Too much medicine in older people? Deprescribing through shared decision making.老年人用药过量?通过共同决策减少用药。
BMJ. 2016 Jun 3;353:i2893. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2893.
9
The feasibility and effect of deprescribing in older adults on mortality and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人减药对死亡率和健康的可行性及效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;82(3):583-623. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12975. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
10
Changes in Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medication and Dietary Supplement Use Among Older Adults in the United States, 2005 vs 2011.2005年与2011年美国老年人处方药、非处方药及膳食补充剂使用情况的变化
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr;176(4):473-82. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8581.