Ordonez Maria, Hwang Eu Chang, Borofsky Michael, Bakker Caitlin J, Gandhi Shreyas, Dahm Philipp
Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, South Korea.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Feb;14(2):61-68. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5957. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
We aimed to assess the effects of postoperative ureteral stent placement after uncomplicated ureteroscopy.
We performed a comprehensive search with no restrictions on publication language or status up to February 1, 2019. We only included randomized trials. Two review authors independently examined full-text reports, identified relevant studies, assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE.
We included 23 studies with 2656 randomized patients. Primary outcomes: It is uncertain whether stenting reduces the number of unplanned return visits (very low certainty of evidence [CoE]). Pain on the day of surgery is probably similar (mean difference [MD] 0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13-0.78; moderate CoE). Pain on postoperative days 1-3 may show little to no difference (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.25; 95% CI -0.32-0.82; low CoE). It is uncertain whether stented patients experience more pain on postoperative days 4-30 (very low CoE). Stenting may result in little to no difference in the need for secondary interventions (risk ratio [RR] 1.15; 95% CI 0.39-3.33; low CoE).
We are uncertain whether stenting reduces the need for narcotics and reduces ureteral stricture rates up to 90 days (very low CoE). Rates of hospital admission may be slightly reduced (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.32-1.55; low CoE). This review was limited to patients in whom ureteroscopy was deemed 'uncomplicated.' In addition, time intervals for the grouping for the reported degree of pain were established post-hoc. The CoE for most outcomes was rated as low or very low for methodological reasons.
Findings of this review illustrate the tradeoffs of risks and benefits faced by urologists and their patients when it comes to decision-making about stent placement after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for stone disease.
我们旨在评估单纯输尿管镜检查术后输尿管支架置入的效果。
我们进行了全面检索,截至2019年2月1日,对发表语言或状态无限制。我们仅纳入随机试验。两位综述作者独立审查全文报告,识别相关研究,评估纳入研究的资格,提取数据,并评估偏倚风险。我们使用随机效应模型进行统计分析,并根据GRADE评估证据的确定性。
我们纳入了23项研究,共2656例随机分组患者。主要结局:支架置入是否减少计划外复诊次数尚不确定(证据确定性[CoE]极低)。手术当天的疼痛可能相似(平均差[MD] 0.32;95%置信区间[CI] -0.13 - 0.78;CoE中等)。术后1 - 3天的疼痛可能几乎没有差异(标准化平均差[SMD] 0.25;95% CI -0.32 - 0.82;CoE低)。置入支架的患者在术后4 - 30天是否经历更多疼痛尚不确定(CoE极低)。支架置入可能导致二次干预需求几乎没有差异(风险比[RR] 1.15;95% CI 0.39 - 3.33;CoE低)。
我们不确定支架置入是否减少麻醉剂需求以及在90天内降低输尿管狭窄发生率(CoE极低)。住院率可能略有降低(RR 0.70;95% CI 0.32 - 1.55;CoE低)。本综述仅限于输尿管镜检查被视为“单纯”的患者。此外,报告疼痛程度分组的时间间隔是事后确定的。由于方法学原因,大多数结局的CoE被评为低或极低。
本综述的结果说明了泌尿外科医生及其患者在决定单纯输尿管镜检查治疗结石病后是否置入支架时面临的风险和益处的权衡。