Suppr超能文献

初级保健中精神卫生的质量指标——文献综述方法之间的比较

Quality Indicators for Mental Health in Primary Care - A Comparison Between Literature Review Methods.

作者信息

Ramalho André, Vinci André, De Lima Inácia Bezerra, Castro Pedro, Teixeira Juliana, Gonçalves-Pinho Manuel, Santos João Vasco, Viana João, Santos Paulo, Alves Domingos, Freitas Alberto

机构信息

MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences - Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.

CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Portugal.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Jul 4;262:316-319. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190082.

Abstract

Evidence regarding quality indicators in primary health care is a major need for better mental health management, monitoring and decision-making. In this paper, we compared two methods of retrieving quality indicators for mental health in primary care by means of an umbrella review, that included eight systematic reviews, and of grey literature. From the umbrella review, 48 primary studies that composed the 8 revisions were analyzed. A total of 94 quality indicators for mental health in primary care were found with the umbrella review, while 2000 indicators were found using the grey literature method. Sixty-eight indicators (3.2% from total) were common to both methods. Both methods can be complementary and useful in order to identify quality indicators.

摘要

关于初级卫生保健质量指标的证据是改善心理健康管理、监测和决策的主要需求。在本文中,我们通过一项涵盖八项系统评价的综合评价以及灰色文献,比较了两种在初级保健中检索心理健康质量指标的方法。通过综合评价,对构成八项系统评价的48项原始研究进行了分析。通过综合评价共发现了94项初级保健心理健康质量指标,而使用灰色文献法发现了2000项指标。两种方法共有68项指标(占总数的3.2%)。为了识别质量指标,两种方法可以相互补充且有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验