Ramalho André, Vinci André, De Lima Inácia Bezerra, Castro Pedro, Teixeira Juliana, Gonçalves-Pinho Manuel, Santos João Vasco, Viana João, Santos Paulo, Alves Domingos, Freitas Alberto
MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences - Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.
CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Portugal.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Jul 4;262:316-319. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190082.
Evidence regarding quality indicators in primary health care is a major need for better mental health management, monitoring and decision-making. In this paper, we compared two methods of retrieving quality indicators for mental health in primary care by means of an umbrella review, that included eight systematic reviews, and of grey literature. From the umbrella review, 48 primary studies that composed the 8 revisions were analyzed. A total of 94 quality indicators for mental health in primary care were found with the umbrella review, while 2000 indicators were found using the grey literature method. Sixty-eight indicators (3.2% from total) were common to both methods. Both methods can be complementary and useful in order to identify quality indicators.
关于初级卫生保健质量指标的证据是改善心理健康管理、监测和决策的主要需求。在本文中,我们通过一项涵盖八项系统评价的综合评价以及灰色文献,比较了两种在初级保健中检索心理健康质量指标的方法。通过综合评价,对构成八项系统评价的48项原始研究进行了分析。通过综合评价共发现了94项初级保健心理健康质量指标,而使用灰色文献法发现了2000项指标。两种方法共有68项指标(占总数的3.2%)。为了识别质量指标,两种方法可以相互补充且有用。