• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单切口吊带术与经闭孔吊带术治疗超重及肥胖压力性尿失禁女性的3年随访结果

The Outcome of a Single-Incision Sling versus Trans-Obturator Sling in Overweight and Obese Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence at 3-Year Follow-Up.

作者信息

Lau Hui-Hsuan, Enkhtaivan Sugarmaa, Su Tsung-Hsien, Huang Wen-Chu

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City 252, Taiwan.

Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 25;8(8):1099. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081099.

DOI:10.3390/jcm8081099
PMID:31349577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723533/
Abstract

: Being overweight or obese is a risk factor for incontinence and has negative impacts on the surgical outcomes. Compared with trans-obturator sling (TOS), single incision sling (SIS) is a new generation of anti-incontinence surgery. However, the data on SIS in overweight and obese women remains limited. : This retrospective study analyzed the objective and subjective cure rate of overweight and obese women who underwent sling surgeries. Other evaluations included valid questionnaires to assess quality of life and 1-hour pad test to quantify urine leakage. Surgical characteristics and adverse events were also analyzed. : A total of 217 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up period of 37.3 months (range, 9-84 months). For overweight and obese patients, the objective and subjective cure rate were comparable (all > 0.05). However, the SIS group had worse post-operative incontinence-related symptom distress ( < 0.001) and 1-hour pad test ( = 0.047). On the other hand, SIS had a shorter surgery time ( = 0.017) and lower pain score ( < 0.001). : Compared with TOS, SIS had non-significant cure rates in the overweight and obese women. SIS had worse urine leakage and incontinence symptoms, but less surgical and wound pain in obese women. Thorough pre-operative counseling is necessary.

摘要

超重或肥胖是尿失禁的一个风险因素,并且对手术结果有负面影响。与经闭孔吊带术(TOS)相比,单切口吊带术(SIS)是新一代的抗尿失禁手术。然而,关于超重和肥胖女性接受SIS手术的数据仍然有限。

这项回顾性研究分析了接受吊带手术的超重和肥胖女性的客观和主观治愈率。其他评估包括用于评估生活质量的有效问卷以及用于量化尿液泄漏的1小时尿垫试验。还分析了手术特征和不良事件。

总共分析了217例患者,中位随访期为37.3个月(范围9 - 84个月)。对于超重和肥胖患者,客观和主观治愈率相当(均>0.05)。然而,SIS组术后尿失禁相关症状困扰更严重(<0.001),1小时尿垫试验结果更差(=0.047)。另一方面,SIS手术时间更短(=0.017),疼痛评分更低(<0.001)。

与TOS相比,SIS在超重和肥胖女性中的治愈率无显著差异。SIS在肥胖女性中尿液泄漏和尿失禁症状更严重,但手术和伤口疼痛更少。术前进行全面的咨询是必要的。

相似文献

1
The Outcome of a Single-Incision Sling versus Trans-Obturator Sling in Overweight and Obese Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence at 3-Year Follow-Up.单切口吊带术与经闭孔吊带术治疗超重及肥胖压力性尿失禁女性的3年随访结果
J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 25;8(8):1099. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081099.
2
Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study.压力性尿失禁女性经闭孔中尿道吊带与单切口吊带的前瞻性随机对照研究:1年随访研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May;27(5):791-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
3
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.单切口无针(Contasure-needleless®)迷你吊带与经闭孔由内向外(Contasure-KIM®)中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照比较:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
4
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 1(6):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2.
5
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.
6
A randomized, controlled trial comparing an innovative single incision sling with an established transobturator sling to treat female stress urinary incontinence.一项比较创新性单切口吊带与已确立的经闭孔吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验。
J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.083. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
7
Comparison of the clinical outcomes of transobturator and single-incision slings for stress urinary incontinence.经闭孔吊带术与单切口吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的临床疗效比较。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2016 Jul;32(7):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
8
TVT Abbrevo and Miniarc suburethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence - A randomised controlled trial.TVT Abbrevo和Miniarc耻骨后尿道悬吊术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Nov;230:141-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.09.032. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
9
Evaluation of Clinical Outcome and Risk Factors for Failure of Single-incision Midurethral Short Tape Procedure (Solyx Tape) for Stress Urinary Incontinence.经阴道单切口中段尿道悬吊带术(Solyx 吊带)治疗压力性尿失禁的临床结局评估及失败的危险因素分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 May-Jun;26(4):688-694. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
10
Twelve-month outcomes following midurethral sling procedures for stress incontinence: impact of obesity.中尿道吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁 12 个月的结果:肥胖的影响。
BJOG. 2015 Nov;122(12):1705-12. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13132. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Mid-term safety and efficacy of the ALTIS single-incision sling for female stress urinary incontinence: less mesh, same results.经阴道单切口吊带(ALTIS)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的中期安全性和疗效:更少的网片,相同的结果。
BJU Int. 2019 May;123(5A):E51-E56. doi: 10.1111/bju.14569. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
2
The prevalence of urinary incontinence in nulliparous adolescent and middle-aged women and the associated risk factors: A systematic review.未育青少年和中年女性尿失禁的患病率及相关危险因素:系统评价。
Maturitas. 2018 Jan;107:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
3
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3.
4
Mini-sling efficacy in obese versus non-obese patients for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.迷你吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁在肥胖与非肥胖患者中的疗效
Minerva Ginecol. 2017 Dec;69(6):533-537. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04081-3. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
5
Minimally invasive treatment of female stress urinary incontinence with the adjustable single-incision sling system (AJUST ™) in an elderly and overweight population.可调式单切口吊带系统(AJUST™)对老年超重女性压力性尿失禁的微创治疗
Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):280-288. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0751. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
6
Twelve-month outcomes following midurethral sling procedures for stress incontinence: impact of obesity.中尿道吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁 12 个月的结果:肥胖的影响。
BJOG. 2015 Nov;122(12):1705-12. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13132. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
7
Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis.女性压力性尿失禁的吊带手术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;211(1):71.e1-71.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.030. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
8
Single incision mid-urethral slings: impact of obesity on outcomes.单切口经尿道中段吊带术:肥胖对结局的影响。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Oct;170(2):571-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
9
Single-incision sling system as primary treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: prospective 12 months data from a single institution.单切口吊带系统作为女性压力性尿失禁的主要治疗方法:单中心前瞻性 12 个月数据。
BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108(10):1616-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10158.x. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
10
Outcome of tension-free obturator tape procedures in obese and overweight women.肥胖和超重女性无张力闭孔带手术的结局
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Mar;22(3):259-63. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1311-1. Epub 2010 Nov 12.