• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施试点电子卒中报告系统,为急救护理人员提供卒中结局信息。

Implementation of a pilot electronic stroke outcome reporting system for emergency care providers.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States of America.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Nashville, TN, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;38(1):114-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.017
PMID:31349907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6917916/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Emergency department (ED) providers and clinicians find that feedback on acute stroke patients is rewarding, valuable to professional development, and helpful for practice improvement. However, feedback is rarely provided, particularly for patients with stroke. Here we describe the implementation of an electronic stroke outcome reporting tool for providing feedback to ED providers.

METHODS

We sought to evaluate the implementation of an electronic stroke outcome reporting tool at 3 Nashville hospitals. ED staff and providers voluntarily enrolled to receive de-identified reports of clinical (e.g., survival) and operational (e.g., timeliness) outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke and were offered free continuing education (CE) credits for following up on patients. We evaluated the implementation of this system through a descriptive evaluation of the feasibility, use of the system and CE, and perceived usefulness of the reports.

RESULTS

We enrolled 232 ED providers, including 107 (46%) nurses and 57 (25%) attending physicians and transmitted 55 stroke outcome reports. Reports took 30-60 min to compile and were viewed by a mean of 2.6 (SD 1.5) registered providers; 97.1% found the reports useful and 36.2% reported likelihood to change practice. Continuing education credits were initiated or claimed by 22 providers.

CONCLUSIONS

An electronic stroke outcome reporting tool was used and liked by ED staff and providers but the time to compile the reports is the major challenge to scalability. Future research should address the effectiveness of this reporting tool as a source of provider education and its impact on clinical and operational outcomes.

摘要

简介

急诊(ED)医护人员和临床医生发现,对急性脑卒中患者的反馈是有益的,对专业发展有价值,有助于改善实践。然而,反馈很少提供,尤其是对脑卒中患者。在此,我们介绍一种用于向 ED 医护人员提供反馈的电子脑卒中结局报告工具的实施情况。

方法

我们旨在评估在纳什维尔的 3 家医院实施电子脑卒中结局报告工具的情况。ED 工作人员和医护人员自愿登记,以接收急性缺血性脑卒中患者的临床(如存活)和操作(如及时性)结局的匿名报告,并提供免费的继续教育(CE)学分,以对患者进行随访。我们通过对该系统的可行性、使用情况和 CE、报告的实用性进行描述性评估,来评估该系统的实施情况。

结果

我们共招募了 232 名 ED 医护人员,包括 107 名(46%)护士和 57 名(25%)主治医生,并传输了 55 份脑卒中结局报告。报告的编制时间为 30-60 分钟,平均有 2.6 名(SD 1.5)注册医护人员查看;97.1%的人认为报告有用,36.2%的人表示可能会改变实践。有 22 名医护人员启动或声称已获得 CE 学分。

结论

ED 工作人员和医护人员使用并喜欢电子脑卒中结局报告工具,但报告编制时间是可扩展性的主要挑战。未来的研究应探讨该报告工具作为医护人员教育的来源的有效性及其对临床和操作结局的影响。

相似文献

1
Implementation of a pilot electronic stroke outcome reporting system for emergency care providers.实施试点电子卒中报告系统,为急救护理人员提供卒中结局信息。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;38(1):114-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
2
Tales from the Trips: A Qualitative Study of Timely Recognition, Treatment, and Transfer of Emergency Department Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.旅程故事:对急诊科急性缺血性卒中患者的及时识别、治疗及转运的定性研究
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 May;28(5):1219-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
3
Involving end-users in the design of an audit and feedback intervention in the emergency department setting - a mixed methods study.让终端用户参与急诊科环境下的审核与反馈干预设计——一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 29;19(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4084-3.
4
Improved incident reporting following the implementation of a standardized emergency department peer review process.实施标准化的急诊科同行评审流程后,不良事件报告有所改善。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Jun;26(3):278-86. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu045. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
5
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
6
Acceptability and Reliability of a Novel Palliative Care Screening Tool Among Emergency Department Providers.新型姑息治疗筛查工具在急诊科医护人员中的可接受性和可靠性
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;23(6):694-702. doi: 10.1111/acem.12963. Epub 2016 May 13.
7
Methods for Collecting Paired Observations From Emergency Medical Services and Emergency Department Providers for Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Risk Factors.从紧急医疗服务和急诊科医护人员中收集小儿颈椎损伤危险因素配对观察数据的方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;24(4):432-441. doi: 10.1111/acem.13144. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
8
Implementation study of a 5-component pediatric early warning system (PEWS) in an emergency department in British Columbia, Canada, to inform provincial scale up.在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的一个急诊科实施一个五组分儿科早期预警系统(PEWS)的实施研究,以为全省范围的推广提供信息。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0287-5.
9
Closing the circle of care: implementation of a web-based communication tool to improve emergency department discharge communication with family physicians.闭合医疗照护循环:实施基于网络的沟通工具以改善急诊科与家庭医生之间的出院沟通。
CJEM. 2015 Mar;17(2):123-30. doi: 10.2310/8000.2014.141327.
10
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科的事件报告。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging artificial intelligence to reduce diagnostic errors in emergency medicine: Challenges, opportunities, and future directions.利用人工智能减少急诊医学中的诊断错误:挑战、机遇与未来方向。
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;32(3):327-339. doi: 10.1111/acem.15066. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
2
Electronic health record-based patient tracking by emergency medicine physicians.急诊医学医师基于电子健康记录的患者追踪
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Apr 1;6(2):e10732. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10732. eCollection 2022 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Tales from the Trips: A Qualitative Study of Timely Recognition, Treatment, and Transfer of Emergency Department Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.旅程故事:对急诊科急性缺血性卒中患者的及时识别、治疗及转运的定性研究
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 May;28(5):1219-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
2
2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.《2018年急性缺血性卒中患者早期管理指南》
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):509-510. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020176. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
3
Improving emergency physician performance using audit and feedback: a systematic review.通过审核与反馈提高急诊医生的绩效:一项系统综述
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;33(10):1505-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.039. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
4
The impact of CME on physician performance and patient health outcomes: an updated synthesis of systematic reviews.继续医学教育对医生表现和患者健康结局的影响:系统评价的最新综合分析
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015 Spring;35(2):131-8. doi: 10.1002/chp.21290.
5
Door-to-needle times for tissue plasminogen activator administration and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke before and after a quality improvement initiative.质量改进举措实施前后急性缺血性脑卒中患者组织型纤溶酶原激活剂给药的门到针时间与临床结局。
JAMA. 2014;311(16):1632-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3203.
6
Improving door-to-needle times: a single center validation of the target stroke hypothesis.提高门到针时间:目标卒中假说的单中心验证。
Stroke. 2014 Feb;45(2):504-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004073. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
7
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.审核与反馈:对专业实践和医疗结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.
8
Does outcome feedback make you a better emergency physician? A systematic review and research framework proposal.
CJEM. 2009 Nov;11(6):545-52. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500011829.
9
"I never hear what happens, even if they die": a survey of emergency physicians about outcome feedback.
CJEM. 2009 Nov;11(6):523-8. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500011787.
10
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.