van Deen Welmoed K, Cho Edward S, Pustolski Kathryn, Wixon Dennis, Lamb Shona, Valente Thomas W, Menchine Michael
Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Ave, IRD 318, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Department of Medicine, Division for Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 116 N. Robertson Boulevard, PACT 801, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 29;19(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4084-3.
Long length of stays (LOS) in emergency departments (ED) negatively affect quality of care. Ordering of inappropriate diagnostic tests contributes to long LOS and reduces quality of care. One strategy to change practice patterns is to use performance feedback dashboards for physicians. While this strategy has proven to be successful in multiple settings, the most effective ways to deliver such interventions remain unknown. Involving end-users in the process is likely important for a successful design and implementation of a performance dashboard within a specific workplace culture. This mixed methods study aimed to develop design requirements for an ED performance dashboard and to understand the role of culture and social networks in the adoption process.
We performed 13 semi-structured interviews with attending physicians in different roles within a single public ED in the U.S. to get an in-depth understanding of physicians' needs and concerns. Principles of human-centered design were used to translate these interviews into design requirements and to iteratively develop a front-end performance feedback dashboard. Pre- and post- surveys were used to evaluate the effect of the dashboard on physicians' motivation and to measure their perception of the usefulness of the dashboard. Data on the ED culture and underlying social network were collected. Outcomes were compared between physicians involved in the human-centered design process, those with exposure to the design process through the ED social network, and those with limited exposure.
Key design requirements obtained from the interviews were ease of access, drilldown functionality, customization, and a visual data display including monthly time-trends and blinded peer-comparisons. Identified barriers included concerns about unintended consequences and the veracity of underlying data. The surveys revealed that the ED culture and social network are associated with reported usefulness of the dashboard. Additionally, physicians' motivation was differentially affected by the dashboard based on their position in the social network.
This study demonstrates the feasibility of designing a performance feedback dashboard using a human-centered design approach in the ED setting. Additionally, we show preliminary evidence that the culture and underlying social network are of key importance for successful adoption of a dashboard.
急诊科(ED)的长时间住院时间(LOS)对医疗质量有负面影响。开具不适当的诊断检查会导致住院时间延长并降低医疗质量。改变诊疗模式的一种策略是为医生使用绩效反馈仪表盘。虽然这一策略在多种环境中已被证明是成功的,但提供此类干预措施的最有效方法仍不明确。让最终用户参与这一过程对于在特定工作场所文化中成功设计和实施绩效仪表盘可能很重要。这项混合方法研究旨在制定急诊科绩效仪表盘的设计要求,并了解文化和社会网络在采用过程中的作用。
我们对美国一家公立急诊科中担任不同角色的主治医生进行了13次半结构化访谈,以深入了解医生的需求和担忧。以人为本的设计原则被用于将这些访谈转化为设计要求,并迭代开发一个前端绩效反馈仪表盘。使用前后调查来评估仪表盘对医生积极性的影响,并衡量他们对仪表盘有用性的看法。收集了有关急诊科文化和潜在社会网络的数据。对参与以人为本设计过程的医生、通过急诊科社会网络接触设计过程的医生以及接触有限的医生的结果进行了比较。
从访谈中获得的关键设计要求包括易于访问、向下钻取功能、定制以及包括月度时间趋势和匿名同行比较的可视化数据显示。确定的障碍包括对意外后果和基础数据准确性的担忧。调查显示,急诊科文化和社会网络与仪表盘报告的有用性相关。此外,根据医生在社会网络中的位置,仪表盘对他们的积极性有不同的影响。
本研究证明了在急诊科环境中使用以人为本的设计方法设计绩效反馈仪表盘的可行性。此外,我们展示了初步证据,表明文化和潜在社会网络对于成功采用仪表盘至关重要。